Slog

Slog Music

Music, Nightlife,
and Drinks

Monday, November 5, 2012

Today in Privatized Prisons: Britain Trains Military as "Backup Jailers" in Case of Prison-Union Strikes

Posted by on Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:55 AM

The privatization of prisons—whose business model depends on locking up more and more people, since penalization is their "product"—has an opponent that isn't usually known for its liberal prison-reform work: prison officers.

Or more specifically: prison-officer unions, which stand to lose jobs and influence if government begins to cede an entire wing of its responsibilities to private business. And let's not forget that private business doesn't just have a prison-management buck to make off government contracts—it has a whole potential labor force of incarcerated people, who are already working below minimum wage for no benefits and "siphoning away" big government contracts, such as sewing military uniforms. (The current contracts go to a government-owned corporation called Federal Prison Industries/UNICOR, founded in 1934, and other corporations want in on the action.)

Privatization advocates want your schools, they want your prisons, they've already dominated elderly care—it's uncanny how they gravitate towards the vulnerable populations.

Meanwhile, unions have begun going to court and and going to court some more and speaking out against privatization as a threat to their livelihoods.

Britain has been dealing with similar problems—prison privatization, restive prison guards—so is training its military to fill in as jailers in case of strikes:

Hundreds of British army, navy and air force personnel are being training as backup prison guards amid fears of a strike at some correctional facilities...

Prison officers are forbidden by law from striking, but they have conducted wildcat strikes. Prison officers at an estimated 80 percent of facilities in England, Scotland and Wales participated in a surprise walkout in May.

This situation will only get stickier as it goes along—a federal government business-monopoly vs. private business, state governments in negotiations with private business, government-employee unions vs. private business, the military training as union scabs... A graph of these intertwining interests and rivalries would look like a plate of spaghetti.

The one big constituency absent from the conversation? The inmates/prison laborers. And why is that? Can't they organize and form prisoner-labor unions to represent their interests?

Of course not! While that isn't explicitly illegal (as far as I've found), the legal barriers are, in the words of Prison Law Blog, "basically unsurmountable." If you're curious about that particular plate of spaghetti, they explain more about it here.

At any rate: Prison privatization is a mess that's going to get messier.

 

Comments (2) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
treacle 2
I'm rather surprised that the concept (and practice) of private prisons hasn't been taken up on some basic levels. Critically, private industry's singular motivation to enhance the "bottom line" runs counter to their maintaining any other goals, including humane treatment, rehabilitation (and thus reduction in prison population), access to legal resources, and more.

Where is the oversight? Where is the accurate accounting of costs and value?
Posted by treacle on November 5, 2012 at 3:07 PM · Report this
treacle 3
taken up = legally questioned
because it is clearly wrought with basic conflicts of interest.
Posted by treacle on November 5, 2012 at 3:11 PM · Report this

Add a comment

Commenting on this item is available only to registered commenters.
Advertisement

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy