Why? Because if Romney were president, they would feel comfortable enough to take the kinds of risks that crashed the market in 2008. This is not a joke...

25% of respondents said they would take on more risk in their portfolios if Romney were elected, as opposed to only 12% who would do the same if an Obama re-election were to take place.

But here is the thing: Investors have done very well under Obama. Not only was there no depression, but the stock market rose 50% during his term...

The results have the tint of conventional wisdom to them, the wisdom that says Republicans are more business-friendly than Democrats and thus better for the stock market. However, only four presidents elected since 1900 have seen the Dow rise 50% or more during their first three years in office, according to Bespoke Investment Group.

One is President Obama, a Democrat. The other three were Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower and Bill Clinton. All three were re-elected to second terms.

If Romney is elected, we can expect a repeat of 2008—meaning, we can expect another spectacular transference of wealth to that tiny (if not tinier) segment of our society. A market crash does not burn money like a fire in a forest. A crash moves money like a heist.