Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, October 29, 2012

Rumor: City Council Members Are Gearing Up to Veto Eastlake Transit Option

Posted by on Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:48 PM

According to several chatterbugs, the Seattle City Council is gearing up to kill a select part of Mayor Mike McGinn's transit budget proposal that would likely help extend the South Lake Union streetcar to the University District via Eastlake Avenue, despite rigorous support from the University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and various neighborhood chambers of commerce that have lobbied hard from the extension.

Mayor Mike McGinn's 2013-2014 budget includes $2 million to study which high-capacity transit option would work best along the downtown/Eastlake Ave corridor: streetcar, bus rapid transit, or light rail. The Eastlake corridor is flagged as a high priority for transit in the city's Transit Master Plan (TMP), which the city council unanimously approved in April, because it would link downtown and South Lake Union—a bustling biotech hub—directly to the UW.

"The Hutchinson Center has a long standing partnership with the University of Washington and though this partnership many students, staff and scientists travel frequently along this corridor," writes Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center director Shelly DaRonche in an October letter to council members. "Creating a convenient and effective connection between Downtown Seattle and the University District will improve transit options not only for more than 4000 employees on our campus in South Lake Union, but also many others who live, work and recreate in South Lake Union and downtown."

In fact, the TMP estimates that extending the South Lake Union streetcar to the University District would net 10,700 new riders a day (for 25,000 riders total). The mayor's $2 million investment would pave the way for having high capacity transit studied, designed, and built within the next five years, presuming capital funding for the project could be secured.

While transportation chair Tom Rasmussen supports the budget item, City Hall sources now say that a number of council members are now skeptical that the corridor is worth the $2 million investment.

Sound Transit will link downtown to the U-District (via Capitol Hill) once its light rail station opens in 2016. And, council members point out, the city should have other high-capacity transit priorities over Eastlake—like connecting downtown to Fremont and Ballard, or extending the Capitol Hill streetcar line.

But fans of the Eastlake corridor route note that the Sound Transit line won't meet the needs of the city's South Lake Union biotech community. "High capacity transit in the area is needed," DaRonche stresses in her letter.

Tomorrow is the deadline for council members to submit their preferences for changes to the mayor's proposed budget, so we'll have a better idea then how strong the opposition is for this transit corridor—and who, exactly, opposes it.

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
And so the 99 Deeply Unpaid-For Tunnel continues to suck up all the transit and road money in the region.

Hey, it's not like it matters, right?

You'll love being trapped in a tunnel below sea level when the 9.0 hits and the power goes out for weeks. As the pumps fail, the air fails, and you realize nobody is going to get you out of there in a city where half the buildings have collapsed.

Enjoy living in a Paradise for the Rich, paid for by the 99 percent.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 29, 2012 at 1:59 PM
Westlake, son! 2
Maybe Shelly DaRonche shouldn't have built something that requires high capacity transit in an area that didn't already have it.

I'd much rather see the slut go up Westlake to fremont/ballard than eastlake.
Posted by Westlake, son! on October 29, 2012 at 2:19 PM
3
"...because it would link downtown and South Lake Union directly to the UW."

Yea, because now, it's practically impossible to catch a bus from the U-District to downtown that goes via Eastlake. And when light rail starts, who's going to take that?

Come on! Investment needs to be where there demand, yes, but also where there's un-met need. There is no un-met need in that corridor. It's over-served.
Posted by TJ on October 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Max Solomon 4
@3: it is NOT over served, as anyone who packs onto those buses knows. and as most of the buses are expresses, getting from UW to hutch or anywhere on eastlake is tougher than getting downtown.

NOT extending the streetcar up eastlake to 45th, minimum, is an absurd decision, but completely in keeping with the city council's bizarre, piecemeal transportation agenda.
Posted by Max Solomon on October 29, 2012 at 2:34 PM
stinkbug 5
@3: in the future, if I'm at campus parkway and the Ave and want to get to the south lake union area (and I don't want to take a bike), I likely will not want to walk up to the 43rd Link station, go down to the platform, wait, ride to Convention Place Station, and then walk to south lake union. I'd rather take a quick streetcar ride.
Posted by stinkbug on October 29, 2012 at 2:37 PM
Cato the Younger Younger 6
It was fucked up when they didn't have the fucking streetcar go all the way up to the U Distirct when they first put it in and we were flush with money everyone wanted to spend.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on October 29, 2012 at 2:37 PM
7
They've talked about cutting that money in order to spend it on bicycle projects, which sounds like a very neat attempt to pit two constituencies against each other.
Posted by Orv on October 29, 2012 at 2:46 PM
Joe Szilagyi 8
This is more anti-McGinn pro-car bullshit. I'm no fan of the stupid extremism that McGinn is a fan of (I'm not going to donate to the Cascade Bike Club anytime soon) but at the same time this is just idiot point scoring against McGinn by the Council.

We can't get district elections fast enough to throw these clowns out in favor of representation that will actually work.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://twitter.com/joeszi on October 29, 2012 at 2:55 PM
gloomy gus 9
If I read the TMP carefully enough, the first phase is to figure out, of all the transit corridors in Seattle, which ones offer the most bang-for-buck. Then those ones are funded to study the best mode for each corridor. So this would be wrangling over which corridors make the cut and which don't, not whether streetcars should be included, right?

P.S. Shelly is not director of Hutch, she is director of facilities.
Posted by gloomy gus on October 29, 2012 at 3:04 PM
Will in Seattle 10
@3 actually, only the 70 lets you off before Westlake Mall. 49 goes on the other side of I-5 and there aren't a lot of crossover points.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 29, 2012 at 3:18 PM
raku 11
$2 mil for 10,700 new transit riders is just not enough money. The deep bore tunnel cost over $1 billion per 10,000 cars, transit should cost at least 10 times that.
Posted by raku on October 29, 2012 at 4:47 PM
12
Wow, it amazes me that some of our council members would be so ignorant of their own city's geography.
Posted by Rocky Mountain Ben on October 29, 2012 at 5:26 PM
DOUG. 13
@10: 66.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on October 31, 2012 at 12:47 AM
14
@6 we weren't THAT flush with money. I think they would have gladly extended the SLUT north already, but to do so they would essentially need to entirely rebuild the Fairview Ave. bridge in front of Zymogenetics, driving up the costs considerably. That is one scary (and smelly) bridge.
Posted by Ivana on October 31, 2012 at 6:08 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy