Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, October 26, 2012

Local Media Has an Obligation to Set the Record Straight on McKenna's Bogus $1.7 Billion K-12 Spending Claim

Posted by on Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM

Republican gubernatorial candidate Rob McKenna said Tuesday that he would spend an additional $1.7 billion on the state's public education obligations and higher education through 2015.
Rachel La Corte, Associated Press

When Republican Rob McKenna introduced his education plan in July—a press briefing to which The Stranger was not invited—our local media trumpeted his promise to "spend an additional $1.7 billion" on public education. (All without raising taxes!) That was the lede of the AP story that ran in dozens of news outlets, and that, to this day, is what many voters believe McKenna intends to do.

But, it's just not true. As I've already shown by using his own spreadsheet, McKenna's plan relies on a $1.7 billion "Property Tax Swap" that provides no additional funding to our K-12 schools in 2013-2015. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

I've shown my math. Double check it.

And it wasn't just the AP's La Corte who echoed McKenna's $1.7 billion claim. Either they all misheard McKenna, or McKenna misled them all. So now that I've debunked McKenna's claim, I fully expect my colleagues to do the best they can to set the record straight.

McKenna says his plan could free up $1.7 billion in new money for K-12 and higher education by 2013-15, fully meeting court-mandated spending for public schools.
Jim Brunner, Seattle Times

Republican Rob McKenna said last week that he can balance books in 2013-15 and put $1.7 billion more into K-12 schools and higher education by 2015 without raising taxes.
Brad Shannon, The Olympian

McKenna has (loudly) made increasing education funding his central issue for more than a year. He has talked ad nauseam for over a year about how K-12 funding has dropped from 50 percent of the budget to 41, and he's issued a concrete plan to cap non-education spending and increase education spending by $1.7 billion in the next biennium.
Josh Feit, PubliCola

McKenna says his plan will provide $1.7 billion for education the first two years, both higher ed and K-12.
Erik Smith, Washington State Wire

McKenna contends he can come up with $1.7 billion for public schools and colleges in his first budget primarily by redirecting money from non-education programs into classrooms.
Jerry Cornfield, Everett Herald

Earlier this week McKenna unveiled a plan to spend an additional $1.7 billion on public education and higher education through 2015.
Mike Faulk, Yakima Herald-Republic

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
slog is local media, asshole
set away...
Posted by maybe you should put on dry panties first on October 26, 2012 at 2:49 PM
Merchant Seaman 2
They probably will not, the repugnant party has learned that when they stamp their feet throw a tantrum and cry about “media bias” the media will let them get away with almost any lie. Did you know for example that there is a scientific controversy over whether the world is 4.5 billion years old or if it is only 6000 years old?
Posted by Merchant Seaman on October 26, 2012 at 2:51 PM
Goldy 3
@1 And we're doing our part. Now it's time for the rest of the local media to chip in and correct the misimpression that they gave.
Posted by Goldy on October 26, 2012 at 2:56 PM
Original Andrew 4
The establishment media is owned by a handful of insanely wealthy individuals and corporations, and their job is to repeat RepubliKKKan lies and right-wing propaganda, while simultaneouly keeping the general population afraid and misinformed. They have no other function.
Posted by Original Andrew on October 26, 2012 at 3:35 PM
pfffter 5
@3 don't hold your breath. Really.
Posted by pfffter on October 26, 2012 at 3:37 PM
6
Goldy is getting frantic. "Oh harold!!!"
Posted by Lew Siffer on October 26, 2012 at 3:50 PM
Pick1 7
Shifting money around doesn't always mean net neutral.

While his claim is untrue on the original merits, it could render a net positive or negative based on how spending is controlled. So, in Seattle, does state or local have more oversight?

Do we have past reports showing which side has a higher % of frivolous spending?
Posted by Pick1 on October 26, 2012 at 5:03 PM
8
Don't hold your breath for other media outlets to set the record straight!
Posted by 1971 on October 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM
Occupy Seattle 9
Goldy, why don't you get that really smart and not-at-all-crazy "businessman" Donald Trump to make a million dollar bet? Any newspaper that covers Rob McKenna's lies on property tax swap and funding education gets $250 grand. Any newspaper that ALSO covers Sam Reed's election fail, voter suppression, and campaign violations on behalf of his Republican stooge Kim Wyman gets $500 grand. And any newspaper that ALSO covers all of Reagan Dunn's missed votes in King County gets the triple crown prize of a million dollars!
Posted by Occupy Seattle on October 26, 2012 at 11:05 PM
10
Darn! If I had only known this four days ago before I voted for McKenna and mailed my ballot. What have I done?! Hahahahahaha!
Posted by Mister G on October 27, 2012 at 11:59 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy