Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, October 8, 2012

The Weekend's Privatized-Prison News

Posted by on Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:10 PM

From a report in Saturday's Business Insider:

By definition, for-profit, private-prison firms rely on steadily increasing incarceration rates for their continued survival.

For instance, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), the nation’s largest for-profit, private prison owner and operator, admitted in its 2010 Annual Report that its “growth is generally dependent upon [its] ability to obtain new contracts to develop and manage new correctional and detention facilities. This possible growth depends on a number of factors [it] cannot control, including crime rates and sentencing patterns in various jurisdictions and acceptance of privatization. The demand for [its] facilities and services could be adversely affected by the relaxation of enforcement efforts, leniency in conviction or parole standards and sentencing practices or through the decriminalization of certain activities that are currently proscribed by [extant] criminal laws.” To circumvent these challenges, CCA spends over $1.2 million each year lobbying for more expansive crime laws. In addition, CCA’s performance as a company hinges on contractually guaranteed occupancy rates of up to 90 percent.

What a deeply perverse set of incentives—the US has the highest incarceration rate in the world, state prisons are overrun, and states are broke. Smart states are thinking about how to reduce the numbers of picayune, non-violent offenders in prison while raising tax revenue. Such as legalizing and taxing marijuana with measures like initiative 502.

Not-so-smart states are handing off their prisons to private businesses, which have a profit motive to increase the percentage of US citizens in prison. And remember, recent studies have shown that private prisons cost states (or at least Arizona) money instead of saving money. That makes privatization a lose-lose proposition: losing for the citizens, losing for the states.

So why isn't the Corrections Corporation of America dumping more money into defeating I-502, which is all about decriminalization and therefore smaller prison populations? Maybe because CCA doesn't run any facilities in Washington state. (Look for facilities in your state here.)

In other CCA weekend news, this comes from a report on Sunday by the Ohio Sandusky Register:

The operator of the nation's first privately-owned state prison is scrambling to correct dozens of safety, health and security issues uncovered in a recent Ohio audit.

Corrections Corporation of America has been firmly rebuked by Ohio officials for conditions identified at Lake Erie Correctional Facility in Conneaut during the September management review. The audit report said cells were dirty, inmates lacked clean laundry and blankets, pots and pans weren't clean, doors were standing open, and keys were missing.

There is nothing good about privatizing our nation's prisons. Even investors in companies like CCA will eventually lose.

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Pope Peabrain 1
How about deducting money for recidivism. There's an incentive for you!
Posted by Pope Peabrain on October 8, 2012 at 1:20 PM
Looking For a Better Read 2
There should never be a profit motive when providing for a common public good, because this conflict of motivation becomes standard. I'm looking at you, charter schools.

Interestingly, there is a similar influence from the public sector unions - at least in California: Link. The CCPOA has been a significant driver of one of the nation's strongest sentencing standards. They were heavily behind the state's Three Strikes rule, among other mandatory sentencing requirements.
Posted by Looking For a Better Read on October 8, 2012 at 1:26 PM
I'm 85 Years Old 3
People should give way more of a shit about this than they do.
Posted by I'm 85 Years Old on October 8, 2012 at 2:20 PM
4
Neither the Stranger nor Business Insider, whose article was quoted, has presented any evidence to support the claim that Corrections Corp. of America has lobbied for "more expansive crime laws."

Clearly, Mitt Romney isn't the only one who just makes shit up.
Posted by Mister G on October 8, 2012 at 3:26 PM
treacle 5
4, Here, let me google that for you:

According to the Boston Phoenix, CCA spent more than $2.7 million from 2006 through September 2008 on lobbying for stricter laws.[29]

CCA spent $14.8 million lobbying the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Office of Management and Budget, the Bureau of Prisons, both houses of Congress, and others between 2003 and 2010.[30]

Wikipedia
Posted by treacle on October 8, 2012 at 4:00 PM
Will in Seattle 6
Only in America would we prioritize Serfdom and 47 cents an hour wages over Sanity.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 8, 2012 at 4:12 PM
7
Meanwhile even Norquist and Gingrich realize we need to lock up less folks: http://www.rightoncrime.com/
Posted by retrogrouch on October 8, 2012 at 5:15 PM
8
Wow Mister G , no evidence? They posted the language from the company's own annual report saying they spent 1.2 million. And yet you don't feel there's any evidence?
Posted by retrogrouch on October 8, 2012 at 5:18 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy