Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Angry Ol' Pot Activists Who Wanna Lock Up Pot Smokers Versus Smiling, Mainstream Folks Who Wanna Legalize Pot

Posted by on Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:37 PM

Someone, I don't know who, dropped off this propaganda poster a few minute ago at the front desk:

Click to enlarge
  • Click to enlarge

If someone told me 10 years ago that this poster would be a real thing—an accurate thing, about medical pot industry folks opposing legalization and elected officials supporting it—I wouldn't have believed them. The poster appears to be made by nwbud.com, a shamelessly juvenile pot blog. And I'm no one to criticize a juvenile pot blog.

 

Comments (27) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Garfield 1
that looks like a pretty effective ad. I was planning to vote for it anyway but that convinced me.
Posted by Garfield on October 2, 2012 at 12:45 PM
coolio 2
Money changes everything!
Posted by coolio on October 2, 2012 at 12:47 PM
Urgutha Forka 3
Merry Christmas!
Posted by Urgutha Forka on October 2, 2012 at 12:49 PM
Foghorn Leghorn 4
It's like the worst advent calendar evar.
Posted by Foghorn Leghorn on October 2, 2012 at 12:54 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 5

If I removed a 3 now,
Would I be stuck with a 2?

For I'm running out of spaces,
There's too many clubs I see.


Lynyrd Skynyrd "Freecell" !
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on October 2, 2012 at 12:54 PM
6
I love this poster. My read on this (based on good reporting in The Weekly) is that the pro-pot-but-voting-against group don't like the DUI provision of the bill, or all the restrictions that will be put on legal pot. To me, a simple case of not seeing the forest for the trees...
Posted by Sterno on October 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM
7
I look forward to giving even less fucks when smoking in public (as in, I won't stop if asked) and growing at home without even trying to hide it in the slightest (even though 502 says nothing about making that legal) when this passes.
Posted by Swearengen on October 2, 2012 at 1:00 PM
8
I could less about these opponents and their nonsense conspiracies and selfish motivations. Bunch of dumbasses the lot of them.

Excellent poster.
Posted by giffy on October 2, 2012 at 1:08 PM
Posted by Sam O. on October 2, 2012 at 1:13 PM
TVDinner 10
@4: Like those kind with the chocolate behind the pictures of rain deer, Santa, and the Virgin Mary? In this advent calendar, I think there'd be alternate chocolate and turds.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on October 2, 2012 at 1:17 PM
Pick1 11
@6 That point has been shot down time and again. Seeing as 0 is the current allowed levels this is an improvement. Some say it's not enough but tests show unless you've smoked very recently you won't register the levels in the bill, and a step in the right direction is always better than no step at all.
Posted by Pick1 on October 2, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Fnarf 12
The "no" crowd is the Tea Party of the left. A bigger bunch of delusional cranks and self-serving opportunists you could not find.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on October 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM
13
Ok, so can I vote with the "Yes" crowd, but party with the "No" crowd?
Posted by longball on October 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM
14
I have one long term concern about all of this, assuming that over the next ten years weed becomes legal in a many states. In a decade or two: are we going to end up with Big Marijuana like we have Big Tobacco now? Will the days of buying fresh, organic weed by the gram be gone forever, replaced by mass produced marijuana cigarettes with more cyanide than THC in them? (Rumor caveat) supposedly the big tobacco companies are already prepared to mass produce and sell weed products.

Make no mistake, we need to put an end to days of cops rounding up poor, non-white, non-violent smokers like cattle and shipping them to prison. We need to eliminate one of the cartels' biggest markets. We need to get our state all this tax revenue. But, are we about to end this era of essentially freely available, fantastic weed on the West Coast?
Posted by algorhythm99 on October 2, 2012 at 2:58 PM
dwightmoodyforgetsthings 15
@2 FTW
Posted by dwightmoodyforgetsthings http://www.reddit.com/r/spaceclop on October 2, 2012 at 3:02 PM
Doctor Memory 16
@14: as long as home-growing and small-scale growing doesn't become illegal (which nobody but nobody is proposing), the proper answer to all of your questions is "who the fuck cares?" You'll still be able to buy your mendocino small-batch weed.
Posted by Doctor Memory http://blahg.blank.org on October 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM
17
@12 You mean a more wretched hive of scum and villainy?
Posted by Hanoumatoi on October 2, 2012 at 3:16 PM
18
@14 Phillip Morris et al can't enter the pot market until the feds legalize, which will likely be a *LONG* time coming. But that's less important than the fact that the incumbent pot growers and sellers already have the know-how, the distribution networks, and the market presence to grow and sell pot at a profit... and the big tobacco companies do not.

In the long term, I think you'll see it segment much the way the beer market has segmented to include both cheap mass-produced crap and more expensive (but much better) small batch products.
Posted by rocketgeek on October 2, 2012 at 3:38 PM
Will in Seattle 19
Hmmm. So a craft industry? What about BC products?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 2, 2012 at 4:01 PM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 20
@14 It comes down to pure practicality: Hemp is just too easily grown. Even if you want the stanky bud & not industrial-use hemp, it's FAR easier to produce that than tobacco, a notoriously finicky plant. A good analogy is that hemp is Michelle Obama, who'd smile & make the best of things in the sleaziest dive, and tobacco is Ann Romney, who will scream bloody murder if the napkins aren't folded in perfect 45 degree angles.

It's easy for the corporations to control people like Ann, because they can afford the upkeep. It's nearly impossible to control Michelle, because she'll go anywhere. What a lady!
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on October 2, 2012 at 4:15 PM
merry 21
I love Rick Steves.

That is all.
Posted by merry on October 2, 2012 at 4:18 PM
22
The No folks make no sense. Can someone explain?
Posted by SeMe on October 2, 2012 at 5:09 PM
23
@22:

Nominally: I-502 isn't perfect! WAAAAAH!!

In reality: I-502 will stop me from making money off of marijuana being illegal! WAAAAAH!!
Posted by Ben on October 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM
24
The No folks make no sense. Can someone explain?
Posted by SeMe on October 3, 2012 at 8:32 AM
25
@24 DJ Shadow summed it up pretty well. http://youtu.be/s2VG53RIJ50
Posted by TheCraftyB on October 4, 2012 at 11:53 AM
26
The federal Controlled Substances Act violates the Tenth Amendment,AND,the feds have a patent for cannabis ---> Patent Number 6630507.
Posted by 5th Columnist on October 5, 2012 at 5:42 PM
27
That MEDICAL marijuana is now legal in eighteen states and the federal District of Columbia seems to be in violation of the federal Civil Rights Act (because they all seem to discriminate against persons who do not have any of the illnesses required to qualify for MEDICAL marijuana.)
Posted by 5th Columnist on October 5, 2012 at 5:45 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy