Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Word of the Day: Malinformed

Posted by on Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:19 AM

Miami New Times:

A Florida Republican volunteer has been caught on tape calling up senior citizen voters on behalf of Mitt Romney and telling them that President Barack Obama is a secret muslim who wants to take away their Medicare.... "I don't know if you've done any research on Obama or not, but he is a Muslim," the woman says. "If he had his way, we'd be a socialistic country. Ya'll sound like ya'll are seniors citizens, right? You really don't want Obama because he will get rid of your Medicare ... say goodbye to it." Because if there's one thing socialists do its getting rid of "socialistic" programs like Medicare. The woman also informed the voters to "pay attention to Fox News."

Slog tipper and late-night wordsmith Gale—who may have been inspired by the above story—sent this email late last night:

I just made up a word because I couldn't focus my eyes. AND I LOVE MY NEW WORD. It fits this current political climate we are in. Some folks aren't misinformed. They are MALINFORMED. Dare I whisper the demographic... Fox News viewers?

People who pay attention to Fox News—like that Republican volunteer calling to warn seniors that Obama is a secret Muslim socialist who has it in for social programs (?)—aren't just misinformed. They are maliciously misinformed. They are malinformed by malinformers spreading malinformation.

Spread the word.

 

Comments (57) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
That's perfect.
Posted by gloomy gus on September 29, 2012 at 11:29 AM
ArtBasketSara 2
Ohhhhh...they think that socialists end beneficial social programs. Now I understand the desperate opposition!
Posted by ArtBasketSara on September 29, 2012 at 11:34 AM
Gern Blanston 3
She forgot to mention he was born in Kenya. Duh!
Posted by Gern Blanston on September 29, 2012 at 11:34 AM
4
Another new word for you:

pignorant
Posted by duncan98117 on September 29, 2012 at 11:38 AM
5
I'm amazed people still say, let alone fall, for things like this. He has been president for several years and he's not the one trying to get rid of Medicare.... Wake up....
Posted by kendallpb on September 29, 2012 at 11:50 AM
Helenka (also a Canuck) 6
Just another valid point to use when cynics say there's no difference between the two parties: ONE of the parties doesn't need to spread lies ... merely point to the other party's well-documented flip-flops in prolific abundance. So many choices. ::ponders:: Where to start?
Posted by Helenka (also a Canuck) on September 29, 2012 at 12:41 PM
7
Is this illegal? Wrong-headed and deceitful, yes, but is it technically illegal?
Posted by rubus on September 29, 2012 at 12:46 PM
emor 8
Wow. How is malinformed not already a word? It'll be very useful!
Posted by emor on September 29, 2012 at 12:58 PM
Pope Peabrain 9
@7 If lying were illegal the entire Fox News staff would be in jail. Beating them will be sweet revenge enough. VOTE!
Posted by Pope Peabrain on September 29, 2012 at 12:58 PM
mikethehammer 10
@7,

According to the article, the caller was "talked to about the call", but they're not sure whether or not she's still making calls on behalf of the campaign. Leading me to believe it's not only not illegal, but perhaps not even worthy of termination from her position. And that's just one call that the recipient happened to have accidentally recorded. No reason to think she hasn't also been espousing the Kenya narrative and/or any other pertinent information she's privy to.
Posted by mikethehammer on September 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM
11
I object. Since when do we start calling completely made-up shit, "information" of any sort. Deception, propaganda, slander, sure. Information? Mis, Mal, or Bogo, we don't need another word. It's lies, slander and propaganda -- there's our perfectly good extant words for it. Let's use them.

Fox News does not practice malinformation. They practice lies, propaganda and slander. Now, isn't that clearer?
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on September 29, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Gay Dude for Romney 12
Of course Fox, News Corp, or any of its properties have never reported that Obama was anything but having the faith he professes to have. There's no need to when there's plenty of rantings of Rev. Jeremiah Wright that provide the needed context of our president's spiritual and philosophical development.
Posted by Gay Dude for Romney http://mittromney.com on September 29, 2012 at 2:37 PM
Urgutha Forka 13
@12,
Check out the teachings of Mitt Romney's faith - the latter day saints.

Afterwards, let us know if you want to cast the first stone.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on September 29, 2012 at 2:57 PM
14
@12
I think you're a bit confused there.
While I'm not sure that any of the Fox News presenters have ever specifically stated that Obama is a Muslim, they DO have lots of guests on their segments who DO claim such.
And they do NOT correct those guests.
So Fox News DOES provide broadcast time for people who DO claim that Obama is a Muslim.

But then that's why you come here, isn't it?
So that strangers on the internet can tell you that you're an idiot.
Because that is still better than the other options you have.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on September 29, 2012 at 3:28 PM
mrbarky 15
@12 Bullshit. They don't say it, they just bring on guests that say it and promote the lie.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/03…
Posted by mrbarky on September 29, 2012 at 3:30 PM
Free Lunch 16
@12 - "...the faith that he professes to have."

Yes, that's exactly the kind of double-speak Fox News uses, planting that little seed of doubt into the viewers head.

Tell me, is Romney Mormon, or does he just profess to be Mormon?
Posted by Free Lunch on September 29, 2012 at 3:35 PM
ScandalMgr 17
Dan,

Already been done: http://m.urbandictionary.com/#define?ter…

Malinformation is fake information to make a scheme sound more believable. Often in the form of testimonials backing up Pyramid-like schemes. These scams tend to target people who suffer from chronic misinformedness.
Posted by ScandalMgr on September 29, 2012 at 3:46 PM
Gay Dude for Romney 18
@15: Reporting on the controversy, even with the ramblings of kooky guests, is not the same thing as reporting a falsehood. MSNBC did it to.

MediaMatters was created for the sole purpose of destroying Fox News with oodles of money from George Soros.

Posted by Gay Dude for Romney http://mittromney.com on September 29, 2012 at 3:56 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 19

Sort of like SLOG supporting higher income taxes but not asset taxes because it's "for the people".
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on September 29, 2012 at 4:36 PM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 20
Gay Gal for Romney, how we'll miss you after the election. Promise you'll come back to visit us again, once you get another job? Or at least send a note now and then?
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on September 29, 2012 at 4:38 PM
internet_jen 21
If they used all their superpac money better, we could have persuasive items like this instead:

Walk and Talk the Vote - West Wing Reunion - Bridget Mary McCormack
http://youtu.be/v52FLMOPSig

Posted by internet_jen on September 29, 2012 at 4:40 PM
22
This is one of the reasons I find American politics hard to fathom. Why must it make so much difference even if he *were* a Muslim? Don't you folks have freedom of religion down there?
Posted by agony on September 29, 2012 at 4:49 PM
23
@18
"MediaMatters was created for the sole purpose of destroying Fox News with oodles of money from George Soros."

When the facts don't support your position, claim conspiracy.
Nice work there.

"Reporting on the controversy, even with the ramblings of kooky guests, is not the same thing as reporting a falsehood."

I guess you are not aware that Fox News went to court to defend their right to lie during a "report".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Akre

While it is not the SAME thing as "reporting a falsehood" (which Fox has gone to court to claim the right to do) is IS the EXACT SAME THING as providing airtime to people who make such claims.

You'd have an easier time if you just went back to defending racists and bigots.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on September 29, 2012 at 4:52 PM
24
@12 Wright's sermons aren't really all that more kooky then many other mainstream sermons. He targets the evil side of America, which a lot of older black folks can directly relate to. Jim Crow is still very much a living memory for a lot of the older generation.
Surely, you're not going to say they can't air their grievances? Wheres the freedom of speech and honoring the past. Those seem like conservative positions to me.
Posted by CbytheSea on September 29, 2012 at 5:03 PM
Gay Dude for Romney 25
@24 - I would never object to airing their grievances.

@20 - Hi Catalina! My last comments will be on November 7th, and then I will expire totally and forever.

But henceforth gentle breezes will ruffle your hair as my voices of reason will heal your poisoned ear.

Posted by Gay Dude for Romney http://mittromney.com on September 29, 2012 at 5:17 PM
26
Gay Dude for Romney really makes my skin crawl.
Posted by DanDuir on September 29, 2012 at 5:22 PM
27
@25
And when presented with the facts of Fox News going to court to defend its right to lie during broadcasts you just ignore them.

Yet you have no trouble defending racists and bigots who demand to see Obama's birth certificate.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on September 29, 2012 at 5:27 PM
28
@25 you have a odd quirk where you say something then deny saying it all within the same thread. It's super annoying becuase it makes it so I have no context to figure out what you're trying to convey.
So, do you agree that Wright's sermons aren't all that out of line, and thus him being Obama's preacher for a period has no baring? You've also argued that even though Romney is a Mormon, he's pragmatic enough to not follow their teachings 100 percent of the time. So, of you're giving Mitt a pass, it only seems reasonable to do the same for Barry. Hence, that little Wright based diatribe was a waste of space. Perhaps, you'd like to take that statement back. Heck, I won't even say you flip flopped, instead you grew as a person.
Posted by CbytheSea on September 29, 2012 at 5:31 PM
Gay Dude for Romney 29
@28: I don't think anyone's faith should be a deciding factor in a choice for president. Nevertheless, when the preacher is talking about politics it takes on a different tone.

"So, do you agree that Wright's sermons aren't all that out of line, and thus him being Obama's preacher for a period has no baring?"

No, some definitely are out-of-line. Not all. But some are.

Politics in the church is the issue. Not the religion itself.

Posted by Gay Dude for Romney http://mittromney.com on September 29, 2012 at 6:04 PM
30
"Malinformado" is a word en español.
Posted by Rodríguez on September 29, 2012 at 6:12 PM
31
@29 if that's the case, why all the references to Obama's faith? Why even bring up Wright?
I agree that religion and politics are separate, I just hope you can follow that thought and leave Wright behind when decussing Obama.
Posted by CbytheSea on September 29, 2012 at 6:14 PM
32
@22 We do have freedom of religion. However, as in the rest of the world, we also have racist cultural ethnocentrism. We feel comfortable with the European-rooted whites and Hispanics, but not the Middle Eastern Arabs - especially if they're Muslim. Maybe in the future...

@21 That is way, way too clever and long - and expensive! - for its own good. But if she wants to spend the money, go ahead. It just screams "overachiever!"
Posted by floater on September 29, 2012 at 6:58 PM
33
@7 Never having studied law, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that deliberately lying to voters in order to get their votes is considered protected free speech. Look at our own state of Washington, where the Supreme Court decided explicitly that politicians could lie - flat-out lie - to voters. I guess mendacity is too useful and popular a tool for too many folks in power for the Supreme Court to throw it out. Apparently concerns for a healthy democracy take a back seat to political job security.
Posted by floater on September 29, 2012 at 7:06 PM
34
Disinformation is the word you are all looking for.
Posted by Ivan on September 29, 2012 at 7:56 PM
35
@29
"I don't think anyone's faith should be a deciding factor in a choice for president."

Well that's good. But since no one outside of Fox News is suggesting otherwise is there a reason that you're bringing it up?
Well, other than the fact that Fox News (which you are now defending) has gone to court to protect their right to lie on their broadcasts.
But you still bring up Obama's choice of church.
So you claim that the religion is not important except in Obama's case where it is important.

And this is the more attractive option for how you spend your time.
You're an idiot.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on September 29, 2012 at 8:21 PM
36
GDfR your wandering off into territory in which you will ultimately lose. The Liberation Theology of Rev. Wright is 180 degrees different then the Prosperity Theology of Oral Roberts or in a more modern incarnation Joel Osteen.

I doubt you have any understanding of either. But it matters not.

I'll go so far as to grant that Obama is a Muslim. Why fucking care? Muslims can be just as peaceful as Christians, and Christians just as brutal as Muslims.

If you don't get that most basic of points your drooling.
Posted by Machiavelli was framed on September 29, 2012 at 10:16 PM
37
Romney and Obama are both liars and cheats. Neither of them give a damn about your civil liberties and they will both completely bankrupt our country. We cannot continue down this 2 party path any longer. Take off your blindfolds, shut off your tv, step out of your blue and red boxes. Americans don't need big daddy government telling them what they can and can not do. It's bad for me it's bad for you it's bad for business. If you want jobs or freedoms get the government out of the way. Stop taking from future generations to pay for big government. Gary Johnson is the best hope for fixing this mess and he has the track record to prove it. But you won't hear about him on fox or any other big media station because the system is rigged.
Posted by Kh on September 29, 2012 at 10:27 PM
38
does dan savage get royalties from creating and promoting 'new' words? santorum was brilliant, but this one's a dud. malinformed? how about we just say 'lied to'? like, fox news lied to its audience?
Posted by Cassette tape fan on September 29, 2012 at 11:45 PM
dwightmoodyforgetsthings 39
@20- I'm sure Seattle Blues will reappear.
Posted by dwightmoodyforgetsthings http://www.reddit.com/r/spaceclop on September 30, 2012 at 12:37 AM
40
Did you not look up the word before posting this post? It's already a word. It's been used on multiple occasions.

http://www.wordnik.com/words/malinformed
Posted by TJ on September 30, 2012 at 1:10 AM
Posted by Rob in Baltimore http://www.wishbookweb.com/ on September 30, 2012 at 6:36 AM
Tetchy Brit 42
@25 Yes, because there's no-one more reasonable than a guy supporting someone who openly hates them and doesn't consider them a human being.
Posted by Tetchy Brit on September 30, 2012 at 8:47 AM
43
@40 TJ -- In my defense (I'm the slog tipper who didn't google first), it isn't a word with a definition, in the dictionary, as your link proves. It is still a made up word -- and it needs to be in OED, yeah? Perhaps this is a 100th monkey situation -- get enough mass behind the idea, and it spontaneously generates elsewhere.
Posted by bareboards on September 30, 2012 at 9:29 AM
44
I have done phone banking for the Democrats in the past, and presently am doing so for Mainers United for Marriage - the group trying to overturn 2009's anti-gay marriage vote. There's a reason it's called "phone banking" - there are banks of phones, and multiple people, in one, or maybe at most, two, not-all-that-large rooms. You definitely hear what your fellow volunteers are saying, for example in between calls, and/or while the number you're calling is ringing, and/or just after you hang up, or when you go to take a piss break, but even during the call, it's sometimes hard to block out the other people in the room who are talking.

Therefore it's highly unlikely this girl's fellow volunteers didn't hear what she was saying. Also, I have to say it's doubtful she 'went rogue' or that she hadn't already said this a number of times that night, or that week. Political phone bankers almost always have a script dictated to them (an oftentimes very lame one), and wavering from same is generally discouraged.

Posted by Velvetbabe on September 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM
45
There is a reason why "malinformed" isn't in the lexicon. We already have a word for when people maliciously misinform people. It's "LYING."
Posted by DRF on September 30, 2012 at 12:21 PM
46
There is no lie too ridiculous, no conspiracy too far fetched and no amount of propaganda that is patently false for these people. This is what is wrong with the Republican Party - the are so bankrupt of ideas that they have to invent an alternate reality of who Obama is and what he's done. It is going to be such a please to watch Romney/Ryan lose this fall.
Posted by montex on September 30, 2012 at 4:22 PM
47
Nice idea, but it won't last. Most people will hear it and assume it means the same thing as "misinformed" so they'll use it as if that's what it means, and others who do know what it properly means will throw it around carelessly against things that don't deserve its venom. So between those factors, it'll quickly become a useless word that can't be used because it means too many different things to different people.
Posted by I have always been... east coaster on September 30, 2012 at 4:43 PM
48
Nope, "malinformation" sounds too much like a euphemism, not different enough from "misinformation" The word LYING is a lot less ambiguous.
Posted by avast2006 on September 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM
49
The fact that the Floridian Republican volunteer got caught telling lies to senior citizen voters is disgusting but par for the course for Republicans. This is one of the reasons that I'll be celebrating when they lose.

They deserve to be relegated to the status of the Whigs. Nasty people.
Posted by Patricia Kayden on September 30, 2012 at 5:54 PM
geoz 50
I just keep reading Nate Silver's stats, and smiling another day. Cause guess what? 4 more years baby.
Posted by geoz on October 2, 2012 at 11:19 AM
51

cheers for the actual article i have recently been on the lookout with regard to this kind of advice on the net for sum time right now so many thanks
garcina cambogia
Posted by roger1122 on April 27, 2013 at 3:45 AM
52
This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing websites that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. It is the old what goes around comes around routine.
med assisting
Posted by Victor1122 on May 9, 2013 at 8:47 AM
53
hello, your website is really good. We do appreciate your give good results
all inclusive bahamas
Posted by Victor1122 on May 15, 2013 at 1:31 AM
54
I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. Thanks...
skin treatment
Posted by Victor1122 on May 16, 2013 at 2:41 AM
55

Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic.
clarke quay restaurant
Posted by roger1122 on May 16, 2013 at 4:09 AM
56

I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?
millennial media alternative
Posted by roger1122 on May 18, 2013 at 3:30 AM
57

This blog is so nice to me. I will keep on coming here again and again. Visit my link as well..
Visit W3BZ
Posted by roger1122 on May 21, 2013 at 5:55 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy