yes, but. yes, but noting technical gotchas isn't how you win; you slam back five times harder. instead of pointing out mitt's selective quoting, omg he violated quation rules! any graduate student knows, that's dishonest! you slam him for TAKING FROM THE POOR TO GIVE TO HIMSELF a la the huge massive welfare he got every year to the tune or $2 million due to his special 15% lazy welfare unearned tax break on the capital gains Bain lobbied for; then you say "collectively, the one percent avoided umpty umpt bazillion in taxes that way, they still have that money, so we're going to fix that by surtaxing wealth of anyone in the capital gains class at x percent over y and surtaxning all incomes over z at x percent, too." "They took too much, and we will get it back, and it will go half to debt paydown and half to building things that rebuild america for middle class prosperity in the long term." he "purposely left out" part of the quote, boo hoo, my god, what a whining rejoinder. We need democrats who calculate how much the capital gains crowd got, then say "we're taking it back so you the middle class don't need to pay down that part of the national debt. They will." any condo association with finances like ours would impose a capital assessment, no? any family in this situation would go to better off son no.1 and get more to fix the roof. the money is there, we're just afraid to take it.