Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Is a Teamsters Spokesperson Distorting Gael Tarleton's Record?

Posted by on Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31 AM

At last night's meeting of the 36th District Democrats, Teamsters Political Action Director Heather Weiner, the city's most committed foe of Gael Tarleton, took to the mic to denounce Tarleton for what she said were several anti-environment, anti-worker actions during her service as a Port Commissioner.

Tarleton is now hitting back, releasing the following statement through her campaign:

I successfully passed a resolution at the Port to expedite clean air on diesel trucks two years ahead of the EPA mandate. I have never voted against clean air while on the Port. I supported an initiative to prohibit cruise-ship dumping in Puget Sound. The statement made [last night] was factually incorrect and wrong. I stand by my votes and my proven record to create a clean-fuel economy at the Port while protecting the environment

Tarleton wouldn't offer a theory as to why Weiner is so doggedly working against her this year. "She has a way of showing up," Tarleton told me last night. "That's all I have to say about that."

Weiner, for her part, responds: "I didn't just show up, though as Woody Allen says that's 80% of success, eh? I'm a long time dues paying member and volunteer with the 36th Dems and have owned a home in Interbay since December 2004."

So perhaps that explains why Weiner was at the 36th Dems' meeting last night. But, why did she say what she said? And can she support it? Weiner sent over this fact sheet to support her assertions this morning:

* * * * * *

Port Commissioner Tarleton says she is a champion for the environment, but votes the other way.

* December 2010: Port Commissioner Tarleton weakened proposals to protect south Seattle neighborhoods from diesel exhaust, a known carcinogen.

Tarleton circulated her own amendment to weaken Commissioner Rob Holland’s motion directing the port to speed up its clean truck program and bring the port up to California standards. Her amendment on behalf of the trucking companies merely restated the existing, weak clean truck program. As a result, stronger environmental standards for dangerous diesel pollution were not adopted. The Port of Seattle’s clean truck standards remain significantly weaker than those in California and New York.

PUBLICOLA: The Sierra Club issued a statement yesterday blasting Seattle Port Commissioner Gael Tarleton for blocking a vote Tuesday on a resolution directing the port’s director to come up with alternative plans to clean up the port’s dirty diesel trucks, which travel through the Georgetown and South Park residential neighborhoods. The statement reads, in part, “We are very disappointed that Commissioner Tarleton has blocked the Port’s support for common sense air pollution programs. Air pollution from the trucks at the Port hurt communities in South Seattle, provide unjust working conditions, and contribute to climate disruption. … Seems Commissioner Tarleton is duping the voters who supported her as a progressive. Now, she is using her position to protect the corporations that make money at the port, like Wal Mart and the American Trucking Association.”


* Tarleton has raised thousands of dollars from anti-environmental trucking companies and their PACs, including a maximum contribution from the Trucking Action Committee on 9/11/12.

December 2010: Port Commissioner Tarleton killed a Port resolution to stop port staff from lobbying against the Clean Ports Act, a bill enabling ports to set clean truck standards. Tarleton’s vote “abstaining” on Commissioner Creighton’s December 2010 resolution to support the Federal Clean Ports Act was the swing and killer vote (3 needed to pass). The Federal Clean Ports Act is cosponsored by WA Congressmen Inslee, Smith, McDermott, Larsen and endorsed by WA State Democrats, King County Democrats, Sierra Club, the 36th District Democrats and more than a hundred national environmental and social justice groups. The Stranger reported that the Port staff were lobbying against the bill and spending $60,000/quarter on a K-street lobbying firm in DC, yet Commissioner Tarleton refused to vote for a resolution intended to stop the port’s staff from lobbying against the Clean Ports Act.


36th District Democrats Resolution, passed 3/13/10:

WHEREAS the U.S. Congress is currently considering introducing legislation to address these lawsuits and empower ports to set environmental, safety and labor standards for port trucking operations; and

WHEREAS empowering ports to set environmental, safety and labor standards is supported by a wide range of organizations and leaders including: Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Steelworkers of America, Mayor of Seattle Mike McGinn, members of the Seattle City Council, and many others;  

Therefore be it resolved that the 36th District Democrats support empowering ports to set their own environmental, safety and labor standards for port trucking operations and urge our elected Representative and Senators to do the same.


* Tarleton has raised thousands of dollars from port terminal operators, shippers and their PACs opposing the Clean Ports Act, including a maximum contribution from Pacific International Terminals on 8/15/12.

April 2012: Port Commission President Tarleton votes down the state’s proposals to prevent cruise ship dumping in Puget Sound.

As Commission President, Tarleton led the vote to reject the WA Department of Ecology’s proposed amendments to an MOU with cruise ship industry to address cruise ship dumping in Puget Sound - the proposed amendments would have banned the discharge of all cruise ship wastewater in Puget Sound. Tarleton then successfully offered her own weakened amendments on behalf of the cruise ship industry.

COALITION NEWS RELEASE: The environmental groups Friends of the Earth, People For Puget Sound, Puget Soundkeeper Alliance and Surfrider Foundation proposed the amendments to the MOU in order to protect public health and aquatic resources from the discharge of treated sewage and gray water by cruise ships while they are in Puget Sound and the Northwest Straits…. The Puget Sound Partnership, Washington Department of Ecology, and the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary have all supported the call for a ban on cruise ship discharges by endorsing the MOU amendments proposed by the environmental groups last fall. All three have sent letters to the Port Commissioners stating their support for banning the discharge of treated sewage and gray water by cruise ships at dock or while traversing in Puget Sound.

Tarleton raised thousands of dollars before the cruise ship pollution vote from cruise ship corporations like Holland America.

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Ouch. So Tarleton's statement is... completely false?
Posted by opengov on September 20, 2012 at 12:25 PM
2
Sounds about right.
Posted by elaineinballard on September 20, 2012 at 12:36 PM
3
I don't think that Heather Weiner is necessarily the "city's most committed foe of Gael Tarleton," but she is the most articulate. Kudos to Heather for expressing what a lot of us in the environmental, social justice, and labor communities believe to be true. GT is not our friend, lies to our face, and would be a poor representative of the 36th. Oh, and did I mention that she's a deep-bore tunnel booster as well?
Posted by elaineinballard on September 20, 2012 at 12:41 PM
4
So by "never" voting against clean air, Tarleton actually meant "except for the multiple times it was documented on the record by leading environmental groups"? Who's distorting what?
Posted by Distortionist on September 20, 2012 at 12:43 PM
Forget it, Jake, it's Chinatown. 5
Pitbull Noel Frame, who has the charm and grace of a teamster, is a stooge for the unions.
Posted by Forget it, Jake, it's Chinatown. on September 20, 2012 at 12:58 PM
6
So by "factually incorrect" Tarleton means the opposite?

Words! They're like visual confetti you can just sprinkle around the page for looks.
Posted by Polypodiaceae on September 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM
7
Eli. You need the word "No" at the end of that headline.
Posted by JohnWyble on September 20, 2012 at 1:27 PM
8
This is why Tarelton is so dangerous. She is a wolf in sheep's clothing. She manipulates the legislative process to do the bidding of the corporate interests who fund her campaigns, while sending out news releases claiming to to the exact opposite. It is a pattern: she is the swing vote that KILLS the pro-environment or pro-worker proposal...and then SHE introduces a different proposal (supported by the corporate interests) that is so watered down that it doesn't really do anything...and then sends out news releases touting her "leadership" and success on the issue. She trys to make herself look like the champion, when in fact, she was the biggest opponent. This is a skilled politician and propagandist-- which makes her very dangerous to progressive interests in our state.
Posted by Jessica419 on September 20, 2012 at 1:39 PM
rob! 9
I think the text of the "fact sheet" should be block-quoted or an embedded .pdf or .jpg or something, instead of simply below a line of asterisks.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on September 20, 2012 at 1:41 PM
10
For the record, I was speaking last night in my unofficial capacity as an environmental lawyer with 19 years of experience, former Sierra Club lobbyist, former Earthjustice Sr. Legislative Counsel, 3-4 voter, mediocre tomato gardener, boring lesbian who goes to bed by 10 every night, and longtime dues paying member of the 36th Dems -- not in my day job capacity as a Teamster
Posted by Heather Weiner on September 20, 2012 at 1:46 PM
11
I'm with the one who said there should be a "No" at the end of the headline given that the only citation of facts in the whole article comes from said Teamster spokesperson. Tarleton is coming off like a tool and would be better advised to heed the lesson of Daniel Patrick Moynihan when he said "You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts."

I think the whole premise to this story is lame but I can't blame Eli for being tempted by it after Tarleton baited him there with her statements. So I'll play too: An alternative and more appropriate headline "Is Gael Tarleton using the 'truthiness' defense to distort the facts about her record?"
Posted by Barry Michaels on September 20, 2012 at 2:40 PM
12
@10: You can play the "hat game" all you want. You are on the Teamsters payroll, and before that, on another non profit group's payroll. You don't work a regular job. Remember the good old days when you would sit down with people instead of attacking them in the media? Guess those are over, but I hear Cathy Allen might be hiring.
Posted by hmmmmm on September 20, 2012 at 2:47 PM
13
I don't claim to know the ins and outs of local politics, but it seems like Gael T needs to post a rebuttal to the facts that Weiner provides here - -otherwise, something stinks and it's not just the Port.
Posted by BeckySel on September 20, 2012 at 3:27 PM
14
So Tarleton's campaign is attacking Weiner for showing up at her own precinct and having an opinion. More ignorant voters is exactly what we need.

Tarleton's just pissed that Weiner can actually convince people with unfair facts. Good to see she's choosing to shoot the messenger. That's such a winning strategy. Actually, given how out of step on policy instead of smooth talking she sounds with the voters in the 36th maybe it is her best option.
Posted by Echo HIll on September 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM
15
Eli, just a word of advice on fact-checking: It involves more than cutting and pasting statements from paid political operatives and presenting them as unvarnished truth. There's a step that comes after that. It's the part where the journalist is supposed to do, you know, some WORK. Because the idea is, you're not supposed to become the useful cudgel for settling someone else's scores.

The reality you should consider looks more like this: Heather Weiner wrote a special-interest bill and handed it to Holland, the Port Commissioner she bought and paid for. The bill didn't get passed. Heather didn't get 100 percent of what she wanted. Oh, the horror. In Heather's bizarro world, not giving her exactly what she wants defines the enemy as a nay-sayer, regardless of reality. (This is where you're supposed to challenge the operative, by the way.)

Heather's stalkerazzi routine is getting tiresome. The sadder part is the way she plays your otherwise entertaining publication like a cheap fiddle.

(Oh, and Heather - your statement that you were speaking on your own behalf at the 36th District meeting was laughable.)


Posted by Relling on September 20, 2012 at 10:38 PM
16
Relling (Jason Bennett),

I cannot figure out why you repeatedly advise your clients to put out a press release or mailer that highlights their very biggest flaw, allowing the opposition a huge boost and earned media time.

Saying it's "personal" and that Gael's opposition are "stalkers" is some pretty weak sauce. It's also raucously anti-feminist and paranoid. I see some borderline personality stuff in there regarding the black-and-white thinking called "splitting."

There is opposition to your candidate because she is dishonest. She says supports an issue and you've helped her wrap it up press releases, but when it comes down to it, she votes the other way. She has looked her biggest supporters straight in the eye and lied to them over and over. All the while, begging for money from the very corporations that oppose legislation for clean air, clean water, and a living wage.

Worse, she travels to DC to lobby against bills she publicly says she supports, making her Yoshitani's lap dog. That's not just dishonest - it's the highest level betrayal to her supporters, her constituents, and to their values.

Wrapping yourself in the progressive sash won't do it, you have to actually vote that way.

Posted by davkanist on September 21, 2012 at 9:18 AM
17
@16 - Bennett writes under his own name. You gonna go after him now, too? You know, with threats and stuff? That would fit the ugly little moves you and your cohort have been pulling. Who knew asking a journalist to check stuff independently was so gosh-darned offensive?

You're reaching on the Yoshitani lap-dog line, presumably because you're too nettled to think rationally. Since Tarleton is trying to fire Yoshitani at the moment, you just look weird and Ryan-ish.
Posted by Relling on September 21, 2012 at 10:27 AM
18
Jason,

Ask Gael for an itinerary from her trip to Boston to see "family" (slipping to DC to lobby against F4A).
Posted by davkanist on September 21, 2012 at 11:36 AM
19
I heard the debate between gael and noel. Noel doesn't know what the Puget Sound Partnership is. And Gael supports the Partnership, knows about water and enviro issues. Doing research I found a long explanation in 2007 Sierra Club local newsletter WHY to support Gael. The info this year has all been anti-Gael and nothing pro-Noel. Who is this Teamster puppet?
The weblinks to the cruise ship dumping claim go nowhere. So are these claims with no supporting statements? I am looking for info to make an informed decision.
I actually came to The Stranger site to find that nasty Press Release the boys at local Sierra wrote to Gael for defending herself against their lobbyist friend Weiner. Want to post this here to remind ppl that Port business progresses, and good standards are being implemented. But want to see what the SC says they coulda done better...http://earthfix.kuow.org/energy/article/…
Posted by Dahling Purpose on October 31, 2012 at 11:51 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy