Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Connie Rice Doesn't Yet Know if She Can Help Repair Seattle's Police Department, but She Already Has a Message to the Bitterly Divided Officials at City Hall: "We Are Going to Have to Get Over that Stuff."

Posted by on Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:41 PM

Connie Rice: She fixed the LA cops, but can she unite Seattles elected leaders?
  • DH
  • She reformed the LA cops, but can she unite Seattle's elected leaders?

Connie Rice is among the preeminent American leaders who can fix broken police departments, and she was in Seattle recently, working for the city, to figure out if she can help us meet the terms of a federal decree to reform the Seattle Police Department. She’s sued the LAPD—most famously—along with the NYPD and departments in New Orleans, Chicago, and a half-dozen other cities.

The first question for Seattle is whether we’re worthy of Rice's help (you may recall that Rick Braziel, a leading candidate for police chief in 2010, bowed out of the nomination after a few days visiting Seattle). Rice says she won't sign a contract until she determines if we’re even capable of remedy—if the political divisions are so deep-seated, as she puts it, that “the politics can preclude the healing.”

“I need to understand the factions,” Rice told me after her first day of interviews with community groups, the mayor, and cops. She says a court order approved by US District Court judge James Robart last month to remedy patterns of excessive force and racial bias in policing is "just a document." Before the city can make cultural changes, everyone involved—the mayor, council, city attorney, beat cops, community groups, etc.—must decide that “you all want to jump off the cliff together.”

Of course, those officials are reluctant to do anything together. After the US Department of Justice blasted the city last December with allegations of unconstitutional policing, Mayor Mike McGinn, City Attorney Pete Holmes, and three city council's relations were so acrimonious that—and they all share blame for this—they literally couldn't even stay in the room to craft a response. They fractured into a passive-aggressive battle of letters leaked to the press. "We are going to have to get over that stuff," Rice says. But she's not pessimistic. "If it can be done in LA, it can be done here. I think that Seattle's different offices will learn to carry out this decree jointly because that is what professionals do. The key to this process is everyone in the boat rowing in the same direction," Rice explains, "and that is what we have to show the court."

Like I said, Rice isn't all that familiar with our elected professionals.

Sitting opposite each other, Rice and I talked across a sprawling conference table with 20 empty seats in mayor's office, and she delved into American policing models as a proxy for controlling slaves, the problem with right-wing police unions, and how cops are afraid of getting murdered on the streets.

Rice wrote a book called Power Concedes Nothing about her legal and political advocacy for civil rights. What does she mean by that title, in reference to police departments? "Police don't concede power because they think it means weakness, and weakness can actually get you killed," begins Rice, who is—it must be mentioned—the cousin of former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. "I love that slogan because it's honest; nobody is goign to change unless you show them how the change is good for them and you demand the change."

Police departments of modern America are derived from an anachronistic model, she goes on. "Our legacy is what we used on slave plantations." She calls it "containment suppression."

"Police are not part of these communities. They see these communities as vectors for violence and danger." She pauses. "I have studied this in college and I have not lost my medications."

What is the root of our cultural problem within the SPD? I ask if she thinks it's it the city's police union, the Seattle Police Officers Guild, which calls leaders of the Race and Social Justice Initiative "the enemy" and jokes about shooting African American leaders and the ACLU. Rice doesn't know about our police union yet, she says, but she's known many police unions. "My personal experience is that police unions are the last to change, but they will change. If LA's Police Protective League can change, anyone can change."

As Seattle enters into the decree with the US Department of Justice, a process begins that erodes a sense of us-versus-them, she says. "The police should feel safer in there communities, and these communities should feel safe enough to call the police to help."

Rice doesn't have a contract, she hasn't seen a list of candidates to be the court monitor, and, as for her long-term role with the city, she says, "I am on a listening tour to define that role." But assuming she stays, we may be getting to know Rice very well. "Strap on your seat belts and get comfortable, because this can be a long process," she says. In the next months and years, Seattle will be selecting a monitor to report to the court, finding a compliance coordinator, establishing a policing commission, auditing its policies and data-collection methods from top to bottom, and muscling through a cultural change from the chief to the stubborn cop union.

But the hardest part may be getting our divided city leaders to get over their bullshit.

"It will require people who used to fight each other to get into boat and row together—the warring should be over. The fighting should be over."

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Joe Szilagyi 1
Before the city can make cultural changes, everyone involved—the mayor, council, city attorney, beat cops, community groups, etc.—must decide that “you all want to jump off the cliff together.”


Or a court can tell everyone to get in line or else...
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://twitter.com/joeszi on September 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM
briantrice 2
Wow. She sounds very capable.
Posted by briantrice http://www.briantrice.com on September 20, 2012 at 3:59 PM
Banned on The Seattle Times 3
Well written Dom, you always seem to be able to sum things up correctly.
Posted by Banned on The Seattle Times on September 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM
gloomy gus 4
Super interview with a fantastic woman. Aces!
Posted by gloomy gus on September 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM
Partly Cloudy 5
I listened to Connie Rice make many of the same points on KUOW this morning ... I'm in awe of the experience and knowledge she brings to the table.

Help us, Connie Rice! You're our only hope!
Posted by Partly Cloudy on September 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM
6
She sounds amazing, I'd love to hear more about her process.
Posted by planned barrenhood on September 20, 2012 at 6:16 PM
rob! 7
Missing from Dominic's otherwise excellent post is Connie Rice's background, and even her Wikipedia article doesn't have much. Google "connie rice" and near the top you'll get a non-paywall link to the LATimes's January review of her book with a bit more: after about nine years at the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, she left some time after 2000 to found a small consulting law firm, the Advancement Project, which she calls an "action tank."
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on September 20, 2012 at 6:39 PM
gloomy gus 8
Maybe this word cloud will offer insight, rob!
http://theartofdoing.com/inside-the-mind…

Given the amazing turnaround in LA, where the consent decree was much, much tougher than our watered-down one here in Seattle, I somehow think Ms. Rice is up to it.
Posted by gloomy gus on September 20, 2012 at 7:18 PM
9
It would be really amazing to have someone working on this who actually knows about police departments. Most police have very little knowledge of how and why police departments came about, and how that history still advises how they approach and view their jobs, risks, rewards, etc.

And she is also right that everyone has to agree to work together. The court ordered injunctions against prejudice that came about with the civil rights movements had very little effect on people or cities until there was a decision to try to make those changes. The court can provide a club, but clubs don't make better people; that comes from individual intention. Hence why there is still racism, prejudice, etc., even though it is technically illegal and frowned on by the courts- you can't legislate morality.

That's another aspect of this- it's not a legal change, even though the judicial system is the one officially calling for it. The citizens of Seattle have been calling for change for a hundred years, in one form or another. LA's citizens wanted a change, too. They still do, but what needs to happen is the morality of the police that do the work has to be changed to be in line with the ethics they are supposed to be constrained by, and that means that the change will be slow and more informed by personal choice than by courts.
Posted by Lavrans on September 20, 2012 at 7:47 PM
pdonahue 10
c'mon, its not that hard. Our police have no incentives to respect and serve the communities that are in the most trouble with the law, and a lot of incentive to close ranks and protect them selves from any kind of outside reform. As long as law abiding, working people maintain the perception that violent crime and the looming zombie apocalypse is about to consume their lives, they will allow the ruling elites to set policy on who is a criminal and what should be done with them.
I could give a shit what the morality of police is or what ethics they have been charged to uphold, the incentives and economic influences play the tune, and the cops have to dance. Don't like police brutality? just what did you expect when housing costs spiral out of reach of working people and only homeless/marginalized people remain to live by their wits? Work together to create community policing? Nice work if you can get it. The cops are doing what they are paid to do, keep the rabble in check so Amazon can keep extracting wealth and reduce their tax burden.
I think this lady hit it on the head with plantation style community development; neighborhoods divided in to "precincts", remote monitoring sensors on each corner, rapid response militarized police, elected officials afraid to buck their own police unions. The further police venture into this robocop world the more in harm's way they are put, it's a self fulfilling prophecy and I'm starting to think it was set up that way for a reason.
Posted by pdonahue on September 20, 2012 at 9:14 PM
Sean Kinney 11
I just want to see pdfs of the Union newsletter.
Posted by Sean Kinney http:// on September 21, 2012 at 2:06 AM
12
Dominic,

The expression is "deep-seated," not "deep-seeded." Please make a note of it.

~ The Editor You Wish The Stranger Had
Posted by OverSight on September 21, 2012 at 8:48 AM
13
Ms. Rice is a true class act, something this city really, really needs.

An outstanding appointment of the highest caliber.

On the general front, this just came to my attention recently, a joint project between the CIA and Google:

https://www.recordedfuture.com/

https://www.recordedfuture.com/about/blo…

http://rfun2012.eventbrite.com/

(Most interesting ......)
Posted by sgt_doom on September 21, 2012 at 10:51 AM
ScrawnyKayaker 14
What @12 said. And never type "hone in," or I shall taunt you a second time. I am SO sick of hearing that said on the radio!
Posted by ScrawnyKayaker on September 22, 2012 at 7:35 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy