Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Triumph of the Willard

Posted by on Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:05 PM

IMAG2657.jpg

Mitt Romney finally got exactly what he wanted tonight. A coming out party. A debutante's ball. A two-and-a-half-hour long very special episode of This Is Your Life, so the whole world can see just how gosh-darned great Mitt Romney really is. He's smart, successful, calm, dignified, loving, kind, and, oh, yeah, did we mention humble? Totally humble. And real. Authentic. Human. Honest. Funny. Did we say kind before? Let's just say kind again, to be sure.

Of course, the night had its flaws. Clint Eastwood seemed confused and a shadow of his former self as he stammered and interviewed an empty chair. Marco Rubio was almost too good, too human, as he introduced Romney. When he's talking about policy, Rubio gets scary, but when he's talking about himself, he seems expansive, friendly, happy. Luckily, he let a little peevishness shine through when he glared at delegates who dared interrupt his soaring rhetoric with their cries of "Mitt! Mitt! Mitt!"

And the earlier programming was too easily distracted, mentioning and re-mentioning the same parts of Romney's biography over and over again—the (newly 9/11-ified) Olympics, the creation of Staples—and deftly avoiding other parts the base isn't happy with, like Romneycare. And let's not even talk about those protesters, who almost toppled the speech's energy with their cries of "people over profits!" I'm sure Mitt doesn't want to talk about those protesters, either.

But all-in-all, Mitt should be happy with himself. He didn't fuck up his speech. He got properly pissed-off at the right parts, even though he stumbled on the humorous parts, looking awkward as he waited for people to laugh. He shouted out to evangelicals with his calls for the banning of abortion and gay marriage.

And he even pulled one of his famous pranks, when he said he'd create twelve million jobs in four years. Twelve million! Can you imagine the roars of laughter in the writers' room when that number came up? Why not 16 million? Why not 8? Hell, why not 64? Eh, let's go with twelve. It's lower but still high, a likable number. There was no policy to back up that number, only a 5-point plan involving killing Obamacare, lowering taxes and regulations, cutting the deficit, promoting school vouchers, and drilling for oil on American land. Over half of those things have absolutely nothing to do with small business creating jobs at all in the short term, and would probably re-cripple the economy, Bush-style, in the long term. So, get it? That's rich. That's a real knee-slapper. And it was the only policy in the whole speech, aside from a vigorous remounting of the Bush doctrine.

But that doesn't matter, either. What matters is that Mitt Romney spent eleven hours over three days listening to his enemies sing his praises to the heavens. Gingrich, Santorum—he crushed them all, and made them lavish hosannas upon him after the fact. His whole party rallied around him, and they almost made it feel convincing. Still, nobody likes Mitt Romney. But they will back him now, because they have no choice. They will pretend that they've always tolerated his wishy-washiness, his powdery touch, his creepy smile.

And as Romney's celebration ended and the perfect balloons fell from the ceiling perfectly, I sat there in the Tampa Times Forum looking down at him relishing his moment, and I thought to myself, huh. I guess money really can buy you love.

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
notaboomer 1
wait until mitt gets inaugurated and introduces the 2nd, third, and 4th ladies to america.
Posted by notaboomer on August 30, 2012 at 10:51 PM
2
Paul, I think I speak for many of us when I say thanks for taking one for the team. Because you are enduring this crap, we don't need to. Good job, and good reporting!
Posted by crone on August 30, 2012 at 10:54 PM
pg13 3
"Tonight I’d ask a simple question: If you felt that excitement when you voted for Barack Obama, shouldn’t you feel that way now that he’s President Obama? You know there’s something wrong with the kind of job he’s done as president when the best feeling you had was the day you voted for him.”--from Rmoney's speech tonight.

You didn't let me answer your simple question, Willard. Because I'm probably more proud of President Obama today than when I voted for him.

You see, I didn't vote for him expecting him to do everything I wanted him to do. I knew that he couldn't...and I suspected that he wouldn't. He simply wasn't the type of ideologically rigid leftist that the right painted him as or that some on the left dreamed he was.

I voted for him because I knew he was smarter than the other guy. And, after eight years of Shrub, I wanted a smart man to be able to make tough choices to keep our heads above water with the mess he was about to inherit.

And yes, I wish he'd have dared to do more while he had a Congressional majority...but for someone so vilified by so many so quickly, I saw that he was trying to be the leader of all people--not just those who voted for him.

What I've seen for four years, however, is a smart man stymied by a political machine designed to do nothing more than deny him the ability to govern--without any attempt to hide their obstructionist behavior or their selfish, un-American reasons for doing so. AND THEY HAVE THE UNMITIGATED GALL TO THEN BLAME THE PRESIDENT FOR ALL THAT THEY DID NOT ALLOW HIM TO DO?!?!?

No, I was not one who was all whipped up by the idea of change and "Yes, We Can"...and yet, the Affordable Care Act? The end of Don't Ask Don't Tell? A clear sign of positive movement towards backing marriage equality? A stable, if a bit sluggish, economy? The elimination of OBL (however it was done)?

And to have done so with the grace and poise of a true world leader against unimaginable odds and the barely disguised (and totally irrational) hatred whipped up by Faux News and the bile spewing radio bloviards, and spat out on poorly spelled signs held by Tea Party pawns of the super rich? If nothing else, the fact that he remained presidential when so many chose to flatly deny him his very existence, much less the respect he's earned, makes me more proud of him today than I was of him the day I cast my ballot for him.

Has he been the perfect president? No. But while he's been president, things were frighteningly bad...and things have gotten better. All Rmoney seems to offer is vague promises for things to go back to the way they were when they were bad...and to make them worse.

And the best feeling I'll have is the day that I'm sure that Rmoney isn't given the chance to do that...and the smarter guy is re-elected and will still be the President of the United States.

Thanks for making the question so simple, Mitt. With any luck, this night will be the best feeling you'll ever have.
More...
Posted by pg13 on August 30, 2012 at 11:01 PM
Will in Seattle 4
Lot of empty chairs for all the non-white attendees ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 30, 2012 at 11:24 PM
5
Seems that Fox and CSPAN were the only ones to carry his bio flick. A missed chance to expand his likability.
Posted by Large Hardon Colluder on August 30, 2012 at 11:25 PM
6
@ #3, well stated and I concur. Now get all of these horrible rethugs out of my city!
Posted by TampaDink on August 31, 2012 at 12:05 AM
7
@3 well written. I completely agree!!
Posted by moonme on August 31, 2012 at 5:06 AM
8
Thank you @3. Couldn't have said it better myself.
Posted by Tom on August 31, 2012 at 8:56 AM
9
@3, so well done, and @Paul, man, I totally overlooked how awesome your title was until just now.
Posted by PEM on August 31, 2012 at 12:29 PM
merry 10
Just to echo the rest, thank you, pg13, for your eloquent statement. I whole-heartedly agree with every word you wrote.

I'm convinced that there no longer is any such thing as a "Republican" Party - there is the Democratic Party, and then there is the Opposition Party, their sole reason for existence being to simply OPPOSE every single thing that any Democrat, anywhere, ever suggests. They have nothing new to offer, no way forward, no solutions, no ideology other than that professed by Gordon Gekko in "Wall Street".

They are simply and utterly bereft, and, as you say, they have the GALL to ask for the reins of the country back again - THEY, who got us INTO this mess in the first place....

Posted by merry on August 31, 2012 at 12:35 PM
11
@3. Thanks. Think I will feel no guilt in re-electing the more intelligent person, let alone the more human one. Even this old white guy sees that the Repubs are empty of any new ideas and live in fear of the present, forget about the future.
Posted by Itzafig on September 1, 2012 at 12:53 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy