Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, August 24, 2012

An Open Letter to Zoe at AfterElton

Posted by on Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:13 PM

Dear Zoe,

Forgive me for taking so long to respond to the open letter you posted at AfterElton. I was in Iowa for family reunion when your letter was posted, then off on a long-overdue vacation with the HICBIA, and when we got back to Seattle last week we were distracted by preparations for a little dinner party we were hosting. Anyway, Zoe, you wrote...

When I read about Miracle!, your new Helen Keller-themed drag show, my first thought was to search for reactions from Deaf or Blind folks who had attended it. My next thought was to wonder whether you had made the show accessible to people who are Deaf and/or Blind (with audio-description and sign language interpreters), so that the people being mocked therein could judge it for themselves.

Then I read this: "As the audience walks in, there's a giant written announcement up on stage that warns 'this play will be deeply offensive to the deaf/blind community, so please don't tell them. Keep your hands shut!'"

So let’s recap: you, a non-disabled guy, put on a show devoted to mocking disabled people, a show which you intended to be hurtful and offensive to disabled people, and that show starts with you bragging that you care so little what disabled people think about this, you don’t even want them to know. At this point in my letter I should give you some info about me: I’m disabled, I’m queer, and I’m pissed the hell off.

I'm going to answer your relevant questions—did we make the play accessible? what did Seattle's deaf community think of the show?—but first I have to challenge the wild assumptions you're making about my intentions and about a play that you haven't seen. (There's one more performance tomorrow night. I'm happy to get you a comp.) I did not write or direct a show that mocks disabled people. Helen Keller is not the butt of the joke in Miracle! What I did was place Helen Keller's story in a different and, yes, inherently comedic universe. But our goal was to tell Helen Keller's story, Zoe, not to mock Helen Keller. The very first discussion I had with the cast on the very first day of rehearsal was about the importance of maintaining Helen's dignity while we told her story. And I think we succeeded.

Why set The Miracle Worker in a drag bar? Why make Helen a drag queen? Why use drag and camp to tell Keller's story?

The story told in The Miracle Worker is one that audiences know so well—the play is so familiar; the film is so iconic—that most audience members don't really watch the play. They don't pay attention because they don't have to. They know who Keller is, they know her story, they know what happens at the end. So audience members sit back, check out, wait for the small handful of famous moments in The Miracle Worker (the breakfast/fight scene, the "Yes, Helen, water!" scene), and then congratulate themselves on the way out of the theater for going to see that play about the deaf-blind kid and her teacher. We set the The Miracle Worker in a drag bar for the same reason theater companies and directors set Hamlet or Medea on space stations or in the Wild West or during the Second World War: to make a familiar story unfamiliar. (For the record: we aren't doing an adaptation of The Miracle Worker. My play Miracle! is an original script.)

Drag and camp have the power to make any story seem new and strange. And by making the story strange and unfamiliar, by refusing to treat this particular play with unnecessary reverence (the play itself, not the person whose story we're riffing on), we forced audience members to actually sit up and pay attention. Since they didn't know what was coming next, or where we were going, audience members couldn't check out. And when we get to the "Yes, Helen, water!" scene—it's "Yes, Helen, vodka!" in Miracle!—the moment sneaks up on our audiences and they are genuinely moved. From the reviews:

"Dan Savage, writer of sex columns and coiner of obscene monikers for former presidential candidates, has drafted and directed what may go down in history as the most tasteless, hilarious and improbably heartwarming play about Helen Keller ever to grace any stage, anywhere."—Crosscut

"Perhaps the best things about this play (besides the line 'I will cut you and then fuck the cut') are [its] unique moments of realism and humanity, which would not be possible without its absurd, offensive premise."—The Stranger

"Strange as it may sound, given the show’s non-stop vulgarity, Miracle! is actually rather sweet. Ultimately, it’s about family, friendship, and love. And wigs. And disco. It’s not for the faint hearted. But for those who like in-your-face, take-no-prisoners comedy, it’s a most enjoyable ride."—The Examiner

"Jonathon Pyburn’s Hellen Stellar was a brave, believable work of physical performance.... Under all that artiface, Pyburn managed to peek through and bring humanity to the role—so much so that by the end I felt just a little bit weepy."—City Arts

At every performance of Miracle! when Annie finally manages to "shove a word in there" and we see Helen realize that "everything has a name"—at the moment when Annie ends Helen's profound and heartbreaking isolation—people in the theater tear up. Audiences wouldn't be moved or touched or weepy if they didn't care about our Helen and they wouldn't care about our Helen if our Helen was the butt of a cruel two-hour-long joke. (If you're looking for the butt of the joke in Miracle!, Zoe, look to the other drag queen characters in the play—and each and every one of Miracle!'s queens is a hearing, seeing, able-bodied gay man.)

Quickly: that sign on stage at the top of the play that you object to? ("The play you are about to see is deeply offensive to the deaf-blind community. Please don't tell them about it. Keep your hands shut. Thank you.") We are toying with the audiences expectations: we tell them that the play aims only to shock and then audiences are surprised when they're actually moved. The shock collar Helen wears when she performs her drag numbers? In The Miracle Worker Helen is controlled with food—with cakes and biscuits—and Annie objects to seeing Helen treated "like an animal." The shock collar in Miracle! makes audiences uncomfortable and it's supposed to. It is presented as an insult to Helen's dignity—they're treating her like an animal—and Annie, who objects vehemently to its use, ultimately rescues Helen from the shock collar and everything it represents. (And the person whose idea the shock collar was winds up getting shocked herself.)

As for your two questions...

Yes, we made the show accessible to the deaf and deaf-blind. There was ASL-interpreted performance of Miracle! last night and an ASL-interpreted talkback after the show. The deaf audience members at last night's performance—almost all of whom stayed for the talkback—loved the show. (They particularly loved the actor who plays Helen.) And consider this: Miracle! is one of four shows being performed in rep this summer at the Intiman Theater. There were ASL-interpreted performances of the other shows in the festival and twenty times as many deaf people came to see Miracle! as came to see the other shows combined. (I asked one of the deaf audience members last night what he thought of the sign—"keep your hands shut"—and he told me, through an interpreter, that he thought it was hilarious.)

I sent an email to the artistic director of the Intiman Theater, Andrew Russell, and asked him if they had received any complaints.

"We have had maybe 8-10 complaint emails in total," Russell wrote back, "but none of the individuals that wrote to complain have actually seen the show. We have yet to receive a complaint from an individual who has seen the show. When we did [the first] talkback for the show, we had 75 people, several of whom had been in tears.... I also had a detailed conversation with a theater-goer who has seen Miracle!, loves it, and has a deaf son. He said it was hysterical and did justice to the story of Helen Keller, and the heart of it. His only complaint was about the sign at the beginning. I explained that it was part of the journey—to start an audience off so offended and in a possible place of judgement, and then get them all the way to heart-melting. He got that, but otherwise was supportive and laughed a ton."

Mixed reactions to the sign—hey, maybe we'll lose it if we mount the show again.

And this should blow your mind, Zoe: there were people at last night's performance from Deaf Spotlight, a non-profit arts organization for the deaf. After the talkback session they asked me for a copy of the script. They want to stage it themselves—they want to do a staged reading/signing of Miracle!—so that more members of the deaf-blind community can experience the show.

So let’s recap: Me, a non-disabled guy, told the story of an iconic disabled person in a new way and non-disabled people are moved by my play and the disabled people who've attended it not only weren't offended, they enjoyed Miracle! and want to make sure other disabled people have an opportunity to experience it.

Yours,

Dan

 

Comments (73) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Jason Josephes 1
Helen Keller went to town
Riding on a pony
Stuck a feather in her hat
And called it HFKRUGEFKMVDUI
Posted by Jason Josephes http://www.myspace.com/bluemoonseattle on August 24, 2012 at 5:18 PM
MacCrocodile 2
*sigh* Dan, clearly we need to have a good, cleansing glitterbombing to sort this all out.
Posted by MacCrocodile http://maccrocodile.com/ on August 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM
gloomy gus 3
@2, I'd glitterbomb that open-letter-writin' Zoe, if she hadn't just been showered with all the sparkly attention she'd been hoping for. Dan gives and he gives and he gives....
Posted by gloomy gus on August 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM
4
@2: Throwing glitter on gay guys is like throwing sprinkles on cupcakes.
Posted by Dan Savage on August 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM
MacCrocodile 5
Now I want cupcakes. What were we talking about?
Posted by MacCrocodile http://maccrocodile.com/ on August 24, 2012 at 5:57 PM
6
Reading her original letter reminded me of that whole "leotarded" thing, which was not so funny and pretty bad form on Dan's part.
Posted by thebagman on August 24, 2012 at 6:04 PM
7
Wow, Dan must have really dashed this one out. I picked up on two typos: "forced audience members to actually bsit up" and "sneaks up our audiences."
Posted by fallen angel on August 24, 2012 at 6:13 PM
Matt from Denver 8
@ 7, Dan dashes stuff out all the time, then fixes the typos and sometimes even rewrites the heading. It used to annoy me because I don't see the point in rushing it out and fixing it later, but I got over it. You can, too.
Posted by Matt from Denver on August 24, 2012 at 6:28 PM
9
Q: How did Helen Keller burn her fingers?

A: Tried to read the waffle iron.
Posted by Mister G on August 24, 2012 at 6:53 PM
10
@8: I always love a healthy dose of condescension, but I assure you there's nothing for me to "get over."
Posted by fallen angel on August 24, 2012 at 6:57 PM
11
Moral of this story? Don't diss Dan unless a) you've really got your story straight or b) you're ready for a pretty articulate smack down.
Posted by moretent on August 24, 2012 at 6:58 PM
12
And the point of it all is, don't dash off letters complaining about things you haven't experienced. Shrieking self-righteousness doesn't cut it when there are actual performances involved and you weren't in the house.
Posted by Calpete on August 24, 2012 at 7:04 PM
13
@11: Pretty much. :-)
Posted by fallen angel on August 24, 2012 at 7:16 PM
Reverse Polarity 14
God, it cracks me up when buthurt people write wailing letters about something they haven't seen or don't know anything about.

If you're going to get all offended and buthurt, at least do yourself a favor and get offended by something that is real.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on August 24, 2012 at 7:40 PM
Posted by venomlash on August 24, 2012 at 7:49 PM
kim in portland 16
Thank you for being thoughtful, Dan.

Fondly,
A mum with a hearing impaired child
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on August 24, 2012 at 8:04 PM
sirkowski 17
Social Justice Sally strikes again!
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on August 24, 2012 at 8:28 PM
18
Oh great; thanks. I'd *just* put the thing out of my mind. I've been dying to see this play since it opened - it sounds fucking hilarious - and have been checking flights for like 2 months now (I live on the east coast), straight up to last night, hoping for a 'miracle' of my own in the price department, and then a way to explain to people that yes, I was actually flying clear across the country solely to attend a drag play ... but the bastards have the face to charge $650 for one lousy flight, and I just can't swing it. Sniff. And tomorrow's the last showing.

Maybe it'll end up off Broadway ...?
Posted by Velvetbabe on August 24, 2012 at 8:28 PM
19
Her life kept being interesting for a long time. Worth a wiki look for what happened after.
Posted by david on August 24, 2012 at 8:33 PM
20
Is there no ASL sign for irony?
Posted by kinaidos on August 24, 2012 at 8:57 PM
this guy I know in Spokane 21
@15 - thank you for that.
Posted by this guy I know in Spokane on August 24, 2012 at 9:25 PM
Free Lunch 22
@15 - I may be the last person on the Internet to see that, but thanks. I'm still dealing with the after-shock giggles.
Posted by Free Lunch on August 24, 2012 at 10:36 PM
23
Poor Dan. He's got his knickers all twisted. Yeah, kinda tough when you've mocked blind people and get called on it. Dan can't play the hipster card here. He's so nervous he's quoting Crosscut in his defense. Dan you are an asshole. Good luck with the book, another exploitation of the adopted child?
Posted by DanSavageIsABigFatIdiot on August 24, 2012 at 10:39 PM
Mark in Colorado 24
Wow, October is here already?
Posted by Mark in Colorado on August 24, 2012 at 10:42 PM
25
@23 -twisted knickers? You too probably have not seen the play. Saw it 2x, just to make sure the feelings I felt were true, and they were. Dans response/defense makes total sense, whacky as it may seem. It IS touching, and it catches you off-guard. But why should you care @23? You've made up your mind long ago.
Posted by Up all night on August 24, 2012 at 11:40 PM
26
How does this open letter compare to Zoe's open letter to Trey Parker and Matt Stone?
Posted by seatackled on August 24, 2012 at 11:51 PM
27
*Spoiler Alert*
I saw Miracle! last week.I had fun and laughed a lot. The only thing that kept me from being "genuinely moved" were some technicalities. Firstly, why would Helen spontaneously vocalize "Vodka"? The real Annie Sullivan put Helen's hands on her throat and mouth for her to "hear" the words. Annie never did that in Miracle. It's not like Helen could see her mouthing the word!
Also, Helen already had a sign for "mother" all along. Annie didn't succeed in shoving a word in just because she taught Helen the English spelling for the word she already knew!
Otherwise, loved it.
Posted by nifty on August 24, 2012 at 11:51 PM
Corylea 28
Dan, you're a national treasure.

Can't wait for the movie of "Miracle!"
Posted by Corylea http://corylea.com/ on August 25, 2012 at 12:01 AM
29
Dan might be spreading himself too thin...I think I smell a shark jumping somewhere...
Posted by fotoeve on August 25, 2012 at 1:50 AM
30
What gets to me is that Zoe will never understand that she embarrassed herself with this letter. No one told her that placing judgement and drawing conclusions on a play that she's neither seen nor read about is intellectually bankrupt. AfterEllen published this, knowing this.

Zoe will go through life, smugly thinking she's championed the downtrodden and put that privileged Dan Savage in his place. She'll never know she's made a fool of herself.
Posted by jade on August 25, 2012 at 4:55 AM
31
Christ, @23, you are one bitter, sad, nasty motherfucker, you know that?
Posted by Velvetbabe on August 25, 2012 at 5:13 AM
32
@3: Dan, I'm quoting you on that :)
Posted by STS on August 25, 2012 at 7:37 AM
badstone 33
Here here 18. My social circle in Philly and NYC are eager for this one to go on the road. And I like it even better knowing there's a heart to it.
Posted by badstone on August 25, 2012 at 7:53 AM
Sargon Bighorn 34
Mocking deaf-blind people? I thought it was mocking Gay bars and drag Queens.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on August 25, 2012 at 7:58 AM
35
I read her letter first and I thought, "Boy, Dan's really screwed the pooch. How on Earth is he going to talk his way out of this one?"

And then, yet again, he convinced me he's right. Smooth-talking bastard.
Posted by dchari on August 25, 2012 at 8:08 AM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 36
This is what smackdown smells like.
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on August 25, 2012 at 9:50 AM
37
I saw the play Thursday night. I have a deaf daughter. I laughed until I cried. I was very moved. This play absolutely did NOT mock the deaf/blind community. It mocked drag all to hell and back though. Dan did absolutely exactly as he intended. He told a moving story in a new (and completely irreverant) way. Yes it was filthy and as crude as it gets. I guess my humor goes there anyway, because I wasn't offended in the least. And the guy who played Helen Steller? Brilliant. He nailed that performance. He also ended up in my lap, but that is another story.

BTW @16 kim in portland. I so want to meet you. If you ever get to Seattle, let me know. Sounds like we have a lot in common.
Posted by SeattleKim on August 25, 2012 at 10:00 AM
38
Hey, SeattleKim—if you're willing, it would be great if you could swing over to Zoe's post at AfterElton and share your thoughts. Thanks!

http://www.afterelton.com/voices/2012/07…
Posted by Dan Savage on August 25, 2012 at 10:07 AM
A.S.Sexton 39
Helen Keller jokes still? Heehee...I thought her popularity went silent when I was younger.
Posted by A.S.Sexton http://www.alwayssexsurrender.webs.com on August 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM
seandr 40
Congrats on the smash hit, Dan!

Very bummed to have missed it. Please do another Seattle run.
Posted by seandr on August 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM
41
Hi Dan. Done. I pasted my first paragraph from here and expanded on it.

It really was a great play, and I'm so glad I went. I took my oldest daughter (the deaf one is only 14. Not taking her to this type of play yet.) My husband said he just shook his head when he read her facebook update about us going up onstage with the drag queens to enjoy jello shots.
Posted by SeattleKim on August 25, 2012 at 11:09 AM
42
Zoe you really missed the mark, and your assumptions about Dan and the cast are way off. I was totally concerned about all the things you mentioned prior to seeing the show, and I think it was hilarious, moving, and awesome. See the show FIRST, then bitch about it if you are still so inclined.
Posted by A-meeee on August 25, 2012 at 11:43 AM
kim in portland 43
@ SeattleKim,

It would be lovely to meet you, too.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on August 25, 2012 at 1:04 PM
44
The real moral of the story is that "risky" art is a lot less risky if you can use your newspaper as a bully pulpit to fisk anyone who criticizes you. Oh, and if you think something might be offensive you're required to pay the creator $30 for a ticket before you can voice an opinion.
Posted by Not Buying It on August 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM
Fistique 45
Haters gonna hate.
Posted by Fistique on August 25, 2012 at 2:12 PM
46
awesome!

after all, filthy and crude as it gets has always been the sure path to cultural enlightenment.
Posted by .....at least 10 year old boys think so on August 25, 2012 at 2:13 PM
47
Dan - after MarleyBarley and I transcribed the Ira Glass podcast, I sent you an email (back in February) asking if you'd like to help / at the very least endorse some kind of volunteer group to transcribe your podcasts on a regular basis for your readership that can't hear them. I never heard back, so I made some, possibly unfair, assumptions about you, and then I started to feel really bad about my transcription skills. See how our feelings get hurt by what's obviously just an inability to manage an email client? I realize you get a lot of email, but it should be in there somewhere.
Posted by Rubbish_Transcriber on August 25, 2012 at 4:14 PM
48
@47, Hey RT, you may want to direct your question to Nancy H. She is the producer of Dan's podcast. Maybe put a question to her in the comments thread of Dan's next podcast. It is a great idea, and would be very helpful to a lot of people.
Posted by SeattleKim on August 25, 2012 at 4:49 PM
49
I saw this play last Sunday, and I was truly offended by how bored I was.
Posted by Applot on August 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM
50
I was at the Thursday night performance of Miracle! and I'm one of the deaf people Dan saw at the post-play discussion (I'm also on the board of Deaf Spotlight). There was a discussion FB about a month ago, in our community, initiated by a deaf-blind person, who read Zoe's comments and was very upset with what this play seemed to be saying about Helen Keller, and by proxy, deaf-blind people. A healthy discussion followed, admittedly by people who'd never seen the performance. I had requested an interpreter for this and other plays for Intiman's summer festival, so I suggested, despite my own trepidations (based on what Zoe said) that we all keep an open mind and go see the interpreted performance. Well, quite a few did, as Dan said, including the deaf-blind person that initiated the discussion, who promised to keep an open mind. He'd never seen a drag show send-up of well-known movies and plays, a staple of the '80's and '90's. By the time the intermission rolled around, he was a convert, telling me that he was not insulted at all, and thought the play was hilarious. The play actually makes Helen's story humane and universal; another interpreter friend who saw the play earlier said it seems more a indictment of the system of educating the deaf than it is about Helen Keller. The interpreters were having a great time. I thought the play was absolutely a hoot to watch. (And yes, Deaf Spotlight would like to explore the possibility of opening the play to a wider audience in the community.)
Posted by robbo88 on August 26, 2012 at 4:03 PM
51
Yay Dan, way to take on the "Offended Community". Somebody needs to write a play openly mocking these self-righteous arm-chair moralists.
Posted by sloov on August 27, 2012 at 9:07 AM
52
I wish people would note the difference between *portraying* something and *endorsing* something (re: the shock collar).
Posted by Delafina on August 27, 2012 at 9:28 AM
53
Dan, you're a saint.

I would have deleted this message as soon as it became clear she hadn't seen the play. Some people just get off on being offended. That always triggers a mean streak in me. Request denied!
Posted by Subtle Knife on August 27, 2012 at 10:41 AM
54
The response by Dan didn't seem to show any consideration for how the writer may have felt. Whether or not the defense of his art is valid, her feelings and opinion should still be respected and not condescended.

The show should have been presented with ASL interpreters without the Deaf community asking after someone expressed feeling offended. I'm not sure if DeafBlind community members were at the showing, but I have yet to hear anything from them.

Posted by MissJulia on August 27, 2012 at 1:19 PM
55
To #30/jade the problem is that even if someone did point out that she was behaving badly she wouldn't listen, instead she would scream about how the person was abelist and continue patting herself on the back.
Posted by msanonymous on August 27, 2012 at 5:30 PM
56
I'm curious, why make assumptions on what Zoe is thinking/feeling, especially when criticizing the idea of her making assumptions about Dan Savage?
Posted by MissJulia on August 27, 2012 at 5:52 PM
57
Posting on behalf of a DeafBlind lady who cannot access this site because of the wicked capcha:

Dear Dan Savage,

I appreciate the time you took to get some feedback from Deaf audience members, such as in the following instances:

“The deaf audience members at last night's performance—almost all of whom stayed for the talkback—loved the show.”

“There were ASL-interpreted performances of the other shows in the festival and twenty times as many deaf people came to see Miracle! as came to see the other shows combined. (I asked one of the deaf audience members last night what he thought of the sign—"keep your hands shut"—and he told me, through an interpreter, that he thought it was hilarious.)”

“I also had a detailed conversation with a theater-goer who has seen Miracle!, loves it, and has a deaf son. He said it was hysterical and did justice to the story of Helen Keller, and the heart of it.”

“And this should blow your mind, Zoe: there were people at last night's performance from Deaf Spotlight, a non-profit arts organization for the deaf. After the talkback session they asked me for a copy of the script.”

That said, there is one component that seems to be missing. Based on your descriptions here, none of the people whose feedback you outlined…was Deaf-Blind. They were all either Deaf, or in at least one case you mentioned, a (hearing?) parent of a Deaf child.

I don't want to make any assumptions or form any opinions on the show without having seen it myself. I just want to be clear that I am not claiming your show will necessarily be offensive to all Deaf-Blind people.

That said, I am curious to know if you did get any feedback from any Deaf-Blind audience members, and just neglected to mention them in the article. If so, what was their reaction overall? If you haven’t asked any Deaf-Blind audience members, I would urge you to either ask some Deaf-Blind audience members what their reactions were, or encourage Deaf-Blind people to watch the show.

While Deaf and Deaf-Blind people do share the common experience of Deafness, combined Deafness and Blindness certainly changes an individual's experience and Blindness is not a facet of one's experience that can easily be overlooked. In other words, Deaf-Blindness is a distinct experience from Deafness alone and results in a different worldview and mindset, including any gut-level reactions viewers might have had to this show.

Thank you.
More...
Posted by MissJulia on August 27, 2012 at 6:25 PM
58
@57 This is intended to be a genuine question, not an off-the-cuff or offensive one. How would a Deaf-Blind person experience the show? Would it be through an interpreter? I don't have any personal experience with Deaf-Blindness, and I'm genuinely curious (especially because I'm a professional actor myself) about how someone could take in a show who can neither hear nor see it.
Posted by TenrSinger on August 27, 2012 at 8:19 PM
59
@ Miss Julia: In my comments (#50) I posted some comments from my deaf-blind friend. Also, I requested interpreters from Intiman for the full festival, not just Miracle!, and long before there was any discussion about the nature of the deaf-blind character. I regularly see interpreted or captioned performances here in Seattle.
Posted by robbo88 on August 27, 2012 at 8:22 PM
60
@58: I am not the right person to ask that question. I suggest doing research if you are interested in the sensory experience of the Deaf-Blind community.

@59: It may be better if the Deaf-Blind speak for themselves. And it would definitely be best if the concerns of the Deaf community in general were met with more respect.
Posted by MissJulia on August 27, 2012 at 8:33 PM
61
So, MissJulia, you're just here to pontificate on behalf of Deaf-Blind folks, but not actually move the conversation forward in any way?
Posted by clashfan on August 27, 2012 at 9:36 PM
62
@60 "It may be better if the Deaf-Blind speak for themselves."

So, your transcription of a deaf-blind person's words is giving a legitimate voice to the opinions of the deaf-blind, but robbo88's relating of a conversation with a deaf-blind acquaintance is not? Robbo, apparently, you need your deaf-blind associate to give you a direct quote, here, 'cuz if you merely tell us what happened, you know, you're taking his agency away... Not.

No, MissJulia, I'm sorry, but there's no way you can spin this so that the opinion of your deaf-blind friend who hasn't been to the play trumps the opinion of a deaf-blind person who has. Especially considering that your friend was seeking the very opinions that Robbo was proffering: the opinion of a deaf-blind person who'd been to the play.
Posted by SilverChimera on August 28, 2012 at 11:20 AM
63
@61: I am speaking on behalf as myself as a Deaf person. The public message about the show, without a person having seen the show- appears very condescending. Especially when written and directed by someone who isn't Deaf or Deaf-Blind. That really stings. The letter above doesn't seem to acknowledge how this might hurt. Suppose I did see the show and still had concerns. Would my concerns be acknowledged, or "smacked down" in the same way?

@62: Please be aware it wasn't the Deaf-Blind person who saw the show, that actually commented. It was another person summarizing that person's sentiment. And following the opinion of *one* person is generally not a fair way of gauging a group of people's sentiment. The lady above who commented- did not offer an opinion about the show. She emphasized the importance of seeking input from the Deaf-Blind community.
Posted by MissJulia on August 28, 2012 at 12:50 PM
64
The lady who posted the earlier comments asking about Deaf-Blind community input asked that I post the following comments in response to @58:

TenrSinger: Deaf-Blindness entails a range of experiences and I cannot speak for all DB people. As someone who has experienced total deafblindness, I have enjoyed movies and other cultural events through a tactile sign language interpreter who filled me in on both auditory and visual information. The skilled interpreters I've had have provided appropriately-detailed descriptions of what is being said and what is happening visually while maintaining a balance between capturing the intended artistic "feel" and leaving room for my personal interpretation (for example by not telling me what a character is thinking, but instead telling me what the character is doing and letting me come up with my own ideas of what I imagine the character is thinking). A DB person with varying kinds of blindness or deafness can also make use of close-vision interpreters, audio description through assistive listening devices, braille or large print closed-captioning, or any number of other accommodations an individual comes up with, that works for them. Not all DB people have absolutely no usable vision or hearing, so a DB person might be able to enjoy a show directly through their residual hearing/vision. In other words, there are really many ways a DB person can enjoy a movie or play. Again I can't speak for all DB people, so it's best to just ask around and get different answers from different people, but hopefully that at least somewhat answers your question.
Posted by MissJulia on August 28, 2012 at 12:54 PM
65
Regarding response #64, Miss Julia pretty much describes how a deaf-blind person may enjoy a performance. Just as there is a full range of hearing ability, from 100% hearing to 100% deafness, with everything in between (in/ability to hear high notes to in/ability to hear bass sounds) there is also a full range of sightedness, from 100% blind to severe or partial vision (and in/ability to see from the center or sides of the eyeball, etc.) so too with deaf-blindedness. As Miss Julia indicates, using a variety of access methods: tactile interpreting, close-vision interpreting, assistive listening devices, etc.can enable deaf-blind persons access to theater, film, performances, etc.

As a Deaf person who has produced plays in ASL as well as produced many events in Deaf culture, I can say that I prefer that Deaf actors and actresses portray Deaf characters in film and theater. And I prefer that plays in ASL be directed by Deaf persons as well. That said, would it be possible to perform four plays in repertory at Intiman (in addition to Miracle!, the same actors and actresses were cast in Hedda Gabler, Dirty Story and Romeo and Juliet) with a deaf-blind or deaf actor? It's possible, but it's not probable. Acting chops and availability to perform throughout the summer, not to mention the unfortunate dearth of deaf actors and actresses, and for roles for them to play, all enter the equation. Having a hearing director with stature, such as Dan Savage (or as in the past, Peter Sellars, John Seymour Hoffman and others) advance the cause, especially when the portrayal, as in Miracle!, is sensitive.

Posted by robbo88 on August 28, 2012 at 1:52 PM
66
Here's a review of the play from DeafReview:
http://deafreview.com/deafreview-news/4-…
Posted by robbo88 on August 28, 2012 at 2:12 PM
67
A lot of interesting questions in that review. I wouldn't discount that the production may have great artistic benefit. But I wouldn't discount the concern of those who feel offended by the artistic exclusion in the introduction and production process either.
Posted by MissJulia on August 28, 2012 at 2:41 PM
68
I guess you can persist in feeling offended if you want to. I'm just saying that if you were there, and saw the introduction and understood the production process, you might feel different. And you might not.

I'm reminded of the Republicans in Congress who shouted bloody murder at the David Wojnarowicz photograph at the Smithsonian exhibition of "Hide and Seek" and demanded that the show be shut down, without ever even seeing the exhibition of gay and lesbian portraits.
Posted by robbo88 on August 28, 2012 at 11:16 PM
69
I don't think feeling offended is a persistence. But why make a comparison like that if not to diminish other people's feelings?
Posted by MissJulia on August 29, 2012 at 10:31 AM
70
I'm not talking about diminishing anyone's feelings. I'm talking about the fact that you haven't actually seen the items that you purport to be offended by. You've read a third-hand account by someone about this sign that she heard about, about the play, but are offended by this account. I'm saying that if you actually saw it, you might not have been offended. Perhaps offense should be taken at the person who wrote the third-hand account, rather than at Dan Savage, the actors or the play.
Posted by robbo88 on August 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM
71
Yes, I'm a bit disappointed about that sign. Do I need to see the play to clear up that feeling? I don't really want to at this point.

I'm also disappointed that it wasn't acknowledged how hearing about that sign makes Deaf or DeafBlind people feel, especially when they weren't asked to consult or invited to the show. Unless I'm wrong and they were.
Posted by MissJulia on August 29, 2012 at 7:26 PM
72
Was input sought from the DeafBlind community? There is a significant difference between seeking input from Deaf organizations vs DeafBlind organizations. So far I don't see any reference to such attempt.
Posted by rreisdbqwc on November 3, 2012 at 2:25 PM
73
Was input sought from the DeafBlind community? There is a significant difference between seeking input from Deaf organizations vs DeafBlind organizations. So far I don't see any reference to such attempt.
Posted by rreisdb on November 3, 2012 at 2:31 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy