Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Mitt Romney Would Murder Elmo (But Might Feel Bad About It)

Posted by on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:39 PM

Mitt Rmoney told Fortune magazine that he plans to cut millions of government spending by turning Medicare over to the states, squashing Obama's health care law, and "ending subsidies for Amtrak, the National Endowments for the Arts, National Endowment for the Humanities and PBS." BUT! He wouldn't feel awesome about it.

"Some of these things, like those endowment efforts and PBS, I very much appreciate and like what they do in many cases, but I just think they have to stand on their own rather than receiving money borrowed from other countries, as our government does on their behalf," Romney said.

Mitt Rmoney is an entitled rich white prick who doesn't know how things work. Perhaps if we magically transported many of the rich people from the 17th century to now, we would have a group of rich folk that actually appreciate and see the necessity for the arts by providing patronage. But we don't live then, we live now, when rich industrialists have made it virtually impossible for public-serving entitles like PBS to exist without a lot of help. And if PBS or any of these other things went away? Rmoney wouldn't bat an eye—regardless of what he says—he would sleep very well in his complete disregard for how much damage he would do to the rest of us. I DON'T LIKE HIM.

 

Comments (24) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Urgutha Forka 1
Then can't the oil companies and corn farmers stand on their own too?

Meh... whatever. Standard republican blathering.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on August 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM
Bigsfrottin 2
If he TOUCHES PBS there will be hell to pay. As someone who grew up with 7 channels, I vastly preferred settling for whatever was on PBS to mind numbingly flipping through hundreds of channels and finding only crap. I have seen the NOVA documentary on cows twice, and I fucking loved it both times. And the one on cat shows. Hilarious.
Posted by Bigsfrottin on August 16, 2012 at 1:52 PM
3
@2,

PBS was a mainstay for me when I was a kid, especially Are You Being Served and Victor Borge shows. Now, there's so much stuff on the Internet or DVD I don't watch much anymore, but PBS still has a special place in my heart.
Posted by keshmeshi on August 16, 2012 at 1:55 PM
More, I Say! 4
I don't like him, too!!
Posted by More, I Say! on August 16, 2012 at 1:55 PM
5
Elmo is immensely profitable for PBS and would absolutely continue. Jesus you're dumb sometimes.
Posted by Reader01 on August 16, 2012 at 1:58 PM
Hernandez 6
Drops in the bucket compared to military spending and corporate welfare.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on August 16, 2012 at 2:00 PM
7
@3 has it right. As TeeVee settles into comfortable retirement w/ the BOOMERS, the idea of Public Telivision is becoming outdated.
Posted by WenWino on August 16, 2012 at 2:08 PM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 8
" I just think they have to stand on their own rather than receiving money borrowed from other countries, as our government does on their behalf"

So that's our choice? We can only have PBS, Amtrak, etc if we borrow from other countries?

How about making rich people and corporations pay their fair share of taxes?

How about ending subsidies for things like oil companies?

How about cutting the military welfare complex down to about 1/4 of its current size?

How about combining medicare/medicaid/tricare/federal employee health care into one big group plan and letting anyone enroll in it?

Republicans are so dull-witted and unimaginative. Their politicians depend on that.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on August 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM
MacCrocodile 9
Yeah, let's not do that time travel thing. I don't like the idea of accidentally doing art for my great-great-great-great-....grandfather.

@5 - Part of the magic of PBS is that they are not beholden to corporate or commercial interests. Sesame Street was structured like a tv show on purpose, because the format easily reflects the attention span of children watching tv, except instead of commercials, the kids continue to learn about reading and counting, not toys and candy. Every penny Sesame Street makes on merchandise goes back into programming and children's services around the world. If you cut government funding for PBS, much of that will be undermined, and Sesame Street will no longer be brought to you by letters and numbers, but by Yoplait and Mattel. Jesus you're dumb all the time.
Posted by MacCrocodile http://maccrocodile.com/ on August 16, 2012 at 2:15 PM
Max Solomon 10
playing to the spiteful hinterlands. "artists hate you and they hate your god. they think they're better than you. why should they get your hard-earned money for free?"

meanwhile, don't mention that the deficit is 100's times larger than these combined subsidies and that only increased revenues and substantial cuts to the military can address it.

mitt should show us his solution to http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/…
Posted by Max Solomon on August 16, 2012 at 2:28 PM
11
@9 - Federal funding makes up about 15% of PBS' budget. Sesame Street makes many tens of millions in profit sans commercials thanks to its merchandising rights. There are no circumstances under which a zeroing out, much less a reduction, in federal funding threatens Elmo in any way. The headline is flat wrong, and so are you.
Posted by Reader01 on August 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM
balderdash 12
Public bad, private good, no surprises here. PBS and NPR having been on the Republican hit list for years. It's their way of showing people that life is HARD and they're NOT FUCKING AROUND about THE MARKET UBER ALLES.

And yeah, the entirely gratuitous assertion there that China is funding PBS is, well... gratuitous. It's one more Mitt Fib. I don't even know if it deserves a response, because if you know anything about American revenues and spending you know it's completely absurd, and if you don't, you're going to vote Republican anyway.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on August 16, 2012 at 2:34 PM
13
Christ on a cracker, not this shit again. All the funding for the NEA, the NEH, and PBS combined is a fucking rounding error in the federal budget. Can we just give them the equivalent of the money that was flat out lost in Iraq (you remember, the skids of bills that seem to have mysteriously vanished off the face of the Earth) and see what they do with the increase?
Posted by usagi on August 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM
Pope Peabrain 14
Public Television is the only teevee that makes you use your brain. Which is why Republicans hate it.
Posted by Pope Peabrain on August 16, 2012 at 3:30 PM
Sir Vic 15
Wanna bet he keeps the tax deductions for billionaires who "lend" their art collections to museums, but only after they've died and reaped the benefits of faux charity? That's the only kind of art Rmoney cares about: investment art.
Posted by Sir Vic on August 16, 2012 at 3:34 PM
16
If you think Amtrak's a losing proposition, you should look into airlines.
Posted by madcap on August 16, 2012 at 4:09 PM
17
Cut military spending? Are you guys crazy? Do you know how many jobs that will kill?!
Posted by madcap on August 16, 2012 at 4:13 PM
18
Mitt Romney - Fracking anything and everything for a few more bucks, damn the souls damaged in the process.

I don't like him either, Wm.™ Steven Humphrey. Not at all.
Posted by palamedes on August 16, 2012 at 4:58 PM
Fnarf 19
PBS costs about as much as TWO SECONDS of Bush's wars.

It sounds nice to say "stand on their own" but when you are upholding your principles by actively making the world a worse place to be, maybe your principles need to be shoved up your ass. Fuck you, Mitt Romney.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on August 16, 2012 at 6:34 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 20
Growing up in a time before Internet (or cable tv), PBS was an intellectual lifeline for me...a way to get access to science through Jacob Bronowski's The Ascent of Man, Kurosawa movies, British comedy...

However, its monopoly on high brow video has long since vanished due to Discovery channel and Netflix.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on August 16, 2012 at 9:43 PM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 21
Supreme ruler, not everyone can afford cable or Netflix, yet everyone pays taxes.

And, like an apartment in Kent, nothing lasts forever - but things like PBS are nice while they last.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on August 16, 2012 at 9:52 PM
22
I have the biggest crush on Catalina Vel-DuRay right now. Bigger than usual, anyway.
Posted by katallred on August 16, 2012 at 11:45 PM
23
@20 would you do away with public libraries too? After all with the internet etc..... who needs libraries?

Posted by Machiavelli was framed on August 17, 2012 at 2:03 AM
24
Bleedin' 'ell, how would I watch East Enders (even though we're 5 years behind)? Oy, sling yer hook, Mittens, wiffout EE I got nofink!
Posted by Lassie on August 17, 2012 at 6:05 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy