Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Somali Commissioner Resigns from SHA Board, Frustrated with Housing Project Redevelopment

Posted by on Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:54 AM

Just as the Seattle Housing Authority (SHA), a federally funded public corporation that works in tandem with the city, is trying to obtain final approval in the next few months to rezone its Yesler Terrace housing projects on First Hill, one of their board members is quitting. SHA wants to rebuild the 28-acre site as a high-density, mixed income development (Cienna wrote about the final hearing yesterday). But Yusuf Cabdi, who serves on SHA's board of commissioners, says the process is "a huge mess." Cabdi, who is Somali, serves as the de facto representative for many of the east-African population who live at Yesler Terrace. He explains that SHA isn't planning to rebuild enough low-income housing on site (it's unclear if the Seattle City Council will require that the low-income units there now be replaced on site), among other things. That could result in "shipping poor people to South Seattle," Cabdi says by phone this morning. So he's resigning in protest from the SHA board. Here's his statement:

Today, I announced my resignation from the Seattle Housing Authority (SHA) Board of commissioners. I no longer feel that SHA is living up to its mission of providing housing to most needy families in our city. Yesler Terrace is a clear example of how the agency is moving away from its commitment, and engaging very risky projects that will cause irreparable damage to affordable housing stock in the city Seattle.

After five years on the board, I get disillusioned with the service it provides to the tenants and its lack of public accountability and transparency.

Yesler terrace is very risky project; it has many unknown factors that could drain valuable housing authority resources. I would like the city council to address the following concerns as it continue its review of the Yesler Terrace project:

The letter continues...

Have a very thorough resident relocation plan: Tenants need to get the whole truth of the relocation process including “housing counseling” to make sure that they know their options and their tenant rights. For example, whether they will choose section 8 housing or be placed in other low-income housing, and what are the advantages and disadvantages of each option.

I will strongly recommend that the city council to bring a paid third party – like the Tenants Union, Northwest Justice Project, or Columbia Legal Services to serve as tenant advocates, and to oversee the tenant re-location process. I am not saying that SHA will throw the tenants under the bus, but as a matter of transparency and accountability, it is important to bring a third party that will ensure tenant’s rights are being upheld.

As of this moment, no such measure of accountability exists except the word of the Seattle Housing Authority that they will offer counseling and help to the tenants.

When people’s livelihoods and housing and well being of life are at stake, we need more than a statement of intent

We need a way to trace residents for a minimum of five years to see if their new housing is meeting their needs sufficiently, and also this will be a blueprint for the city to understand what happens to people when they are displaced or re-located. This will be conducted by the third party.

Yesler Terrace is home to a majority immigrant and refugee population - most of who do not speak English or have employment skills. Their primary source of generating income is through community day care businesses or growing vegetables in their yards and selling them. When these people get re-located they are going to lose this valuable source of income. SHA and the city have no clear plan to mitigate this situation. Therefore, we need to see language in the cooperative agreement addressing this issue

Thanks

Yusuf Cabdi

Cabdi says he will tender his official resignation in a letter to Mayor Mike McGinn.

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
Sounds like a better plan would be ESL classes.

That and realizing that instead of fighting the light rail created upscaling of the area would be better spent creating mixed income housing near future light rail stations like the one at N 65th.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 9, 2012 at 11:05 AM
meanie 2
How does someone who is on a board for low income housing find the following statement acceptable:

" most of who do not speak English or have employment skills. Their primary source of generating income is through community day care businesses or growing vegetables in their yards and selling them. "

So the issue he has is these people will lose easy access to selling yard food and daycare customers in the same non English community, who presumably pay for daycare with additional government funds.

So this man, and the board want a permanent refugee camp, funded by tax dollars, so the residents can live in prime real estate, and presumably do not have to do anything that normal residents and citizens need to do, get jobs, pay for housing, etc. in order to be productive members of the community?

How does creating a indentured population on tax dollars help anyone? This screed reeks of entitlement.
Posted by meanie http://www.spicealley.net on August 9, 2012 at 11:25 AM
Fnarf 3
@1, maybe YOU need ESL. Grammatically you have achieved a new low, but in the matter of understanding the discussion, your meter is still pinned on zero where it has always been. It's not that you're wrong, so much as it is that your comments just don't make a lick of sense.

Sadly, Cabdi has a good argument. This project is heavily focused on providing subsidized housing for people who earn more than $60,000 a year, which is frankly insane. It's also racially exclusive, because the Adjusted Median Income for all residents is in the uppermost tier for black and Latino residents. Honestly, genuinely poor people are better off taking their chances in the unsubsidized marketplace out of town than in trying to hit the lottery in SHA.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on August 9, 2012 at 11:25 AM
Fnarf 4
@2, you're an idiot, and you have no freaking idea what poor or immigrant communities do or want or need.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on August 9, 2012 at 11:34 AM
Will in Seattle 5
@3 @4 do you even read the article you reply to?

See that last sentence ... what does he "say"?

Next thing you'll propose is that we limit building heights to eight stories "because it's always been that way".

FYI, there is low income housing on my block and also two blocks from me. In houses. Most people don't know it's there, cause they look similar to the other nearby housing.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 9, 2012 at 11:43 AM
meanie 6
@4 fnarf, I always enjoy your nuanced ad hominem additions to discourse.

I want the poor and immigrants to succeed in this country in the same way we all do, but demanding a perpetual state funded habitrail for insular communities is a pretty bad way to do it.

Historically "projects" are always a terrible idea. how would this one be different? The attitudes here are even worse.
Posted by meanie http://www.spicealley.net on August 9, 2012 at 11:59 AM
7
But every current resident can stay, and they're building the new housing in phases, according to the FAQ on the Seattle Housing Authority site. This myth that all the poor people are getting kicked out to gentrify this space is just ridiculous.

Furthermore, leaving the board in protest (and not staying on as an advocate for this community) will probably just make things worse.
Posted by Subdued Excitement on August 9, 2012 at 12:23 PM
8
@7,

If you believe everything SHA promises when they're trying to raid City coffers for millions of housing levy and other dollars, I have a bridge I can sell you cheap.

I'm impressed with Yusef's move - and the notion that SHA was allowing him to "advocate for this community" is belied by the facts of how this project has unfolded and what is being proposed. He (and pretty much every other tenant "representative" they deign to appoint to their Board) was being used as window dressing by SHA, and he was absolutely right in walking.

It's too bad more people in Seattle public life don't have the balls to call bullshit in plain language when they see it.

Posted by Mr. X on August 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM
9
http://www.seattlehousing.org/redevelopm…

So these are falsehoods, @8?
Posted by Subdued Excitement on August 9, 2012 at 1:13 PM
10
@9, SHA has stated falsehoods for the last 10 years at least, and the fact that you apparently believe that "every resident can stay" when the place is going to be bulldozed is an example of the utility of those falsehoods.
Posted by sarah70 on August 9, 2012 at 2:11 PM
11
@2,

So clearly the solution is to make them homeless.
Posted by keshmeshi on August 9, 2012 at 2:16 PM
12
Hey, where were you guys when I was forced to relocate to South Seattle because I couldn't afford a house up north? I understand that tax-funded Somali immigrants' rights to live in neighborhoods of their desiring far exceeds mine, but I'm frankly still a little cheesed about the whole thing!
Posted by Billy Chav on August 9, 2012 at 3:05 PM
scary tyler moore 13
i can't decide who's a bigger dumbshit, Will in Seattle, or SROTU. there ARE ESL classes available for yesler terrace residents. LOTS of them. and what makes you think somalis don't speak english? all the ones i know do. you, on the other hand, speak pure horseshit.
Posted by scary tyler moore http://pushymcshove.blogspot.com/ on August 9, 2012 at 6:33 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy