Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, August 2, 2012

The Secret Grand Jury Proceedings about the May Day Smashup Begin Today—There Will Be Protests

Posted by on Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:32 AM

American Apparel
  • BK
  • American Apparel

During this year's May Day demonstrations, a pack of activists in black smashed out some windows. They smashed out a few windows at American Apparel, NikeTown, and several banks. Somebody also smashed out some glass doors on a federal courthouse.

The doors that launched a grand jury.
  • BK
  • The doors that launched a grand jury.

Those broken courthouse doors—vandalism of federal government property—opened the floodgates for the FBI to start heavy investigation of local political radicals. FBI agents began approaching known activists, asking them to become informants, and clumsily obvious undercover plants started appearing at local political marches.

Law-enforcement officials began kicking down doors in Seattle, Olympia, and Portland, throwing in flash-bang grenades on their way in and holding the occupants at gunpoint while they rifled through their bookshelves, looking for black clothes, sticks that might have been used in the smashup, and "paperwork—anarchists in the Occupy movement" and "anti-government or anarchist literature or material" (according to copies of the warrants obtained by The Stranger and The Portland Mercury, respectively).

Some were given subpoenas and ordered to appear today before a secret grand jury proceeding at the federal courthouse. (The federal government, it's safe to assume, would not be going to these lengths to find and prosecute a non-political vandal—say, a drunk who randomly threw a rock through the courthouse window at 3 in the morning.)

All grand jury proceedings are secret unless pried open in the course of a trial (and even that is tough). They were originally designed, in 1600s English law, as a way for witnesses to provide evidence without fear of reprisal. But, over time, they have evolved into another beast, where prosecutors can, with much rhetoric and low standards for evidence, convince the jurors—who are not selected with the same strenuousness as normal court proceedings—that federal charges should be brought against defendants.

The United States is one of the last countries to use grand juries. During the twentieth century, they have been abolished in England, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and other nations with similar legal systems. For more criticism and analysis of secret grand jury proceedings, see the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

"There's a danger with grand juries looking into issues that involve people's political views," said Doug Honig of our local ACLU chapter. "And if it's not carefully conducted, it can end up becoming a fishing expedition looking into people's political views and political associations."

Given the fact that law enforcement has been raiding houses looking for "literature" and approaching activists asking them about who they know and associate with—and the fact that law-enforcement agents have been collecting cell phones from occupants of the raided houses, presumably for social-mapping purposes—it would seem that they're already on a fishing expedition.

And it's all because of that courthouse door.

Some of those who have been given subpoenas have already announced their refusal to cooperate with the grand jury proceedings on political/anti-authoritarian grounds, at the risk of jail time. Protests at Seattle's federal courthouse (at 7th and Stewart) are planned for today.

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 1
Political or not, these mostly white hoodlum wrecked more properly than the average MS13 illegal.

Let's see if any justice is served in Apartheid Seattle.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on August 2, 2012 at 10:40 AM
gloomy gus 2
"If you don't want to get indicted, don't act like such a ham sandwich." - my sister
Posted by gloomy gus on August 2, 2012 at 10:43 AM
3
I'd really like to be outraged about this, but my overwhelming dislike for anarchists prevents me from caring.
Posted by Tyler Pierce on August 2, 2012 at 10:49 AM
NaFun 4
Cue Fnarf's raging "THEY GET WHAT THEY DESERVED!" in 5, 4, 3...
Posted by NaFun http://www.dancesafe.org on August 2, 2012 at 11:00 AM
5
@ 3. As I'm sure you know, civil liberties aren't contingent on people being likable.
Posted by Brendan Kiley on August 2, 2012 at 11:06 AM
Will in Seattle 6
"Asking them to become informants" ....

You say that like they were given a voluntary choice in the matter, and weren't told they'd be put on the No Fly and other databases if they didn't "cooperate".

Face it, you're serfs. And those "activists" are just thugs.

@5 for the win.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 2, 2012 at 11:13 AM
BombasticMO 7
Agree or not with their politics or their actions, this is fucked up.

The government is railroading people secretly because they're mad about some broken glass.

This kinda of action should elicit outrage in even the most civilized person. The government is simply not following the rules that we've established as a society.

Or if all that motivates you is self interest: if they can secretly try a bunch of alternative people wearing black they can also secretly try a bunch of slog commenters for equally inane reasons. Lacking a jury of your peers, are you sure you could prove your innocence in a non-public trial?
Posted by BombasticMO http://www.BombasticMo.com on August 2, 2012 at 11:15 AM
Pithy Name 8
Well, just to point out - there is a difference between a drunken vandal and a organized group planning and then acting out vandalism during a protest. I can see why the FBI might be a little more concerned about the latter.
Posted by Pithy Name on August 2, 2012 at 11:16 AM
9
In my experience, most anarchists who carry out vandalism don't actually think it through beforehand - they might go to a protest with the goal of "doing something militant," but probably have no idea what that will actually look like. It's like someone who really wants to get laid on a Friday night but who doesn't have a who/where plan.

Also, vandalism is not a serious crime. Even premeditated vandalism. If the Aurora shooter can get an open trial, someone who breaks a window can get one, too.
Posted by redemma on August 2, 2012 at 11:44 AM
10
You do realize all a Grand Jury does is decide if a case goes to trial or not, right? I've served on a Grand Jury. Just like being called in for regular jury duty, you can also be called in for Grand Jury duty. The jury I sat on consisted of 20 people stuck in a room every other day for a month listening to case after case. It is pretty boring, testimonies are usually kept very brief. Like I said, all that is being decided is whether to move things forward or not. Each case was anywhere from 10 monutes to an hour, and that includes all 20 jurors casting their votes. It is a pretty mundane process. Nothing nefarious. I am not sure I see how it could turn into a fishing expedition.

I would say your comparison of the town drunk breaking a window to the group of anarchist smashing 10s if not 100s of thousands of dollars worth of windows (and in threats of violence and I believe at least 2 assaults) is a rather dishonest comparison. But perhaps you weren't intending seriousness to begin with.
Posted by Senor Guy on August 2, 2012 at 11:51 AM
11
@9: I think you may be confused about the differences between a trial and grand jury proceedings. This is just to determine whether to prosecute. Holmes didn't even have a jury determine that, as far as I know.
Posted by doceb on August 2, 2012 at 12:03 PM
Kinison 12
Having the FBI Spy on citizens who were trying to stop the war in Iraq is one thing, it was stupid and over reaching because these citizens wernt trying to overthrow the government. They were trying to stop a war in addition to uncovering the obvious pro-war propaganda and in that, prevent massive loss of life on both sides of the conflict.

Fast forward a decade and you have similar minded people who also want to stop the war, but also want to radically change the government by overthrowing it, lets drain budgets, let smash windows, lets clog the court system, etc. All this really doesnt do anything but give them a political playground in which to maintain raging blue vein throbbing erections, this is all fun to them, they dont want to be anywhere else but in the heart of the chaos they create.

And because these people refuse to show their face, refuse to compromise on anything and simply issue demands while destroying property, while their non-mask wearing friends look the other way under threats of assault, they deserve to be monitored, they deserve to be arrested, their apartments searched, their life turned upside down because they clearly dont have a problem doing this on Capitol Hill.

So as long as the police come with a legal warrant issued by a judge, majority of the population wont care.
Posted by Kinison http://www.holgatehawks.com on August 2, 2012 at 12:52 PM
Will in Seattle 13
Next up, mansion looting and heads on pikes.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 2, 2012 at 1:11 PM
14
@12: Since our police are apparently targeting protesters they recognize from past demonstrations (e.g., #5004 Gregg Calder of SPD's 20/20 leadership using OC spray on Hudson Williams-Eynon), it seems reasonable to find an increase in people who wish to remain anonymous while protesting.
Posted by Phil M http://twitter.com/pmocek on August 2, 2012 at 1:50 PM
Pithy Name 15
@14, Anonymity is fine, if you're not committing visible and obvious crimes.
Posted by Pithy Name on August 2, 2012 at 1:58 PM
16
see also: "Interview: GreenIsTheNewRed.com’s Will Potter on FBI Raids, Grand Juries & Political Repression," by Kevin Gosztola, July 31, 2012, http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/07…
Posted by Phil M http://twitter.com/pmocek on August 2, 2012 at 2:34 PM
17
I support this crackdown on the anarchists. I would support a roundup of the anarchists who live in the house at 23rd & Aloha.
Posted by Trey23 on August 2, 2012 at 3:22 PM
watchout5 18
You can hate on so-called anarchists all you want if the government is raiding your home looking for "XYZ" papers it's time you join in the revolution.
Posted by watchout5 http://www.overclockeddrama.com on August 2, 2012 at 10:11 PM
19
We should be doing more than breaking glass doors of court houses. we should be bulldozing the entire building! most of you don't even comprehend what true anarchism means. it means being the free sovereign responsible sentient human being you were born to be. it means not submitting to some ridiculous regiment of laws/rules/regulations that serve no purpose and being a slave to a government that care not for yours or your family's well being in any way shape or form.
Posted by movement19 on October 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy