Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Somebody Needs to Teach Our Legislators the Meaning of the Term "Public Good"

Posted by on Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:28 AM

The legislature has instructed the state park system to be self-sufficient by 2013, but Discovery Pass revenue continues to come in at less than half what was forecast:

The idea is for the park system to operate more like a business, but that is new ground for a system more accustomed to park preservation than collecting user data and mounting marketing campaigns.

Of course, that's a terrible idea. Parks aren't businesses. If they were, they'd sell off most of their assets to the highest bidders—developers, timber companies, really rich people, etc.—creating a smaller supply of parks that would allow State Parks Inc. to demand a higher admission price. Maximize profits. That's what shareholders would demand.

But it would be Kenyan Socialism™ to suggest that agencies providing public goods should not operate more like a business, so we'll just continue to pursue terrible ideas like this. Stoopid politicians.

 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Sean Kinney 1
"Stoopid politicians"?

Stupid us, Goldy. Stupid us.

Best, Tim Eyman
Posted by Sean Kinney http:// on August 2, 2012 at 9:35 AM
Max Solomon 2
death before a modest state income tax and a reduction in property & sales taxes!
Posted by Max Solomon on August 2, 2012 at 9:44 AM
COMTE 3
Well, most privatization schemes tend to be lose-lose for taxpayers since, in the end, they wind up paying more for privatized services than they do when they're under public control. But, you know CAPITALISM, FUCK YEAH!
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on August 2, 2012 at 9:46 AM
4
It's not long after enactment before a modest state income tax becomes less than modest and initial reductions in sales and property taxes disappear.
Posted by WestSeven on August 2, 2012 at 9:51 AM
5
Running 'parks as businesses' is the most idiotic idea I've read all day. And I been on Facebook and Twitter all morning.
Posted by mitten on August 2, 2012 at 9:54 AM
OuterCow 6
@4 Dude, help me pick some lotto numbers too while you're predicting the future, eh?
Posted by OuterCow on August 2, 2012 at 9:56 AM
7
I have not seen a complete breakdown of the Parks Dept. revenues, but from the article less than 15% of their funding comes from the State General Fund. That seems like a pretty good model to expand upon rather than jeopardize.

Posted by Action Slacks on August 2, 2012 at 10:00 AM
Max Solomon 8
@4: prove it. make your case without a slippery slope fallacy argument.
Posted by Max Solomon on August 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM
Steven Bradford 9
I too am completely baffled as to how we have let our State parks only be accessible to those who can afford it. This was not the idea when they were established.

I can afford it, but
Frankly, I'd be in favor of closing them down, over having a system of supposedly public parks that are closed off from the poor.
Posted by Steven Bradford http://www.seanet.com/~bradford/ on August 2, 2012 at 10:30 AM
10
The phrase "the public good" is right at the top of Ayn Rand's list of unacceptable terminology. She wasn't too crazy about unspoiled nature either.
Posted by Proteus on August 2, 2012 at 10:41 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 11
You answered you own question.

These guys are drooling at the thought of waterfront condos in Discovery Park.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on August 2, 2012 at 10:42 AM
Simply Me 12
Two words: income tax
Posted by Simply Me on August 2, 2012 at 10:51 AM
13
it's horribly horribly regressive to charge for state parks. many people can't afford the $10 fee which btw is rather outrageous. I can afford a $30 pass for the state and another $30 pass for tthe feds, what about unemployed people?

that said, I think it's an overreaction to protest any move towards efficiency. There some things the parks could do better. would it be outrageous to charge 30% for the oceanfront tent sites compared to those at the back of the campground when this means it's still affordable? that's probably okay. I'd like to see costs cut with more emphasis on you bring it in, you take it out, there's no need to have all these trash receptacles for picnickers who carry crap in then overfill the receptacles as if they can't carry it out. iow there's some room for rationalization without ahem, selling off beachfront discovery parkland for condos. Or maybe it would be okay to charge $4 for parking at discovery park or state parks, I'd rather see that than an entry fee of $10. many people walk or bike or bus to state parks. or have a $30 parking pass good for two years. AS to privatization some of it would b okay I wouldn't mind renting a C -Lark sailboat at greenlake or cranberry lake instead of the clunky boats they rent, so ugly most of them, and a cafe with tables at Greenlake where they have the big parking lot near the library would be an amenity. also a cash cow. in bellingham they have a coffee store right on their waterfront walking trail, people love it it's right inside that park, and no it doesn't mean it's a slippery slope to condos in the park. you get a latter right there on the water, sweet, with a very civilized thing called a table and chair. there's no reason we wouldn't want to have that in some waterfront parks like say, golden gardens, why is the hot dog restaurant pushed back from the water, it could be right on the water. oh wait, waterfront is reserved for port offices and their sailing club buddies that cost $300 a month, while a hot dog or a coca cola selling type store is for the plebes, they don't get waterfront.
More...
Posted by social justice AND cafes? on August 2, 2012 at 10:57 AM
Original Andrew 14
Bush & Cheney ran the government like business. They ran it like Enron, but still...
Posted by Original Andrew on August 2, 2012 at 11:08 AM
15
@4,

Like Oregon which has no sales tax?
Posted by keshmeshi on August 2, 2012 at 11:13 AM
Will in Seattle 16
If Parks were run as a business, rich jerks would pay $10,000 a year for their passes.

And get a little gold star allowing them to jump the queue for the bathroom, like the jerks they are.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 2, 2012 at 11:15 AM
Will in Seattle 17
@12 for the Insightful Win.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 2, 2012 at 11:15 AM
Reverse Polarity 18
Absolutely not.

State parks are publicly owned land. We own it. We the taxpayers and citizens. They should be open and available to all citizens, regardless of income. If you want a park run like a business, go to Disneyland.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on August 2, 2012 at 11:56 AM
19
@6,8

Based on my own history living in CA, I could see where @4's coming from. There are states with what I'd term "reasonable" income taxes, but the voting base of WA makes me fear we'd be more likely to follow the CA route than those states.
Posted by Tawnos on August 2, 2012 at 12:44 PM
20
Texas has a good idea. Well, Texas has an idea:
http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/newsmedia/re…
Posted by brucedene on August 2, 2012 at 1:16 PM
balderdash 21
Time to get on the horn to Olympia and start yellin' at some legislators, I guess.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on August 2, 2012 at 1:25 PM
Max Solomon 22
@19: would that be the voting base that approves everything eyman wipes his ass on?
Posted by Max Solomon on August 2, 2012 at 1:26 PM
23
Here's one fiscal conservative who agrees entirely. Public goods like parks, streets, education, and courts are open and useful to all. The state needs to prioritize them over health care and other services for poor people, which have been swallowing an ever larger part of the state budget.
Posted by David Wright on August 2, 2012 at 2:04 PM
balderdash 24
@23, wow. Somehow you managed to take support for an unequivocal public good, and make it a total dick move. Good job, I guess.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on August 2, 2012 at 3:05 PM
25
Please look at what we do in Oregon...we voted to take lottery money to help support our parks.
Posted by Packeteer350 on September 8, 2012 at 7:36 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy