Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Mitt Romney Tells Harry Reid to "Put up or shut up" on Tax Returns

Posted by on Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:00 PM

The Huffington Post says Mitt Romney is mad as hell about Harry Reid floating rumors that Romney didn't pay taxes for a decade, and he isn't going to take it anymore.

For the first time on Thursday, Mitt Romney addressed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's claim that Romney spent a decade not paying taxes, denying the charge and telling Fox News' Sean Hannity that it was time for the majority leader reveal the source of his information.

"Well, it's time for Harry to put up or shut up. Harry's going to have to describe who it is he spoke with because of course, that's totally and completely wrong," Romney told Hannity in a radio interview. "It's untrue, dishonest, and inaccurate. It's wrong. So I'm looking forward to have Harry reveal his sources and we'll probably find out it's the White House. Look, the Obama campaign is going to do everything in its power to try and talk about anything besides the president's record."

The problem with this is that the only person who can really put up or shut up is Romney. He says "of course" he paid taxes like it's a fact in the public record, but it's not. Right now, it's Reid's word against Romney's. Either Reid can produce someone who said they once heard Romney didn't pay taxes for a decade or Romney can produce conclusive proof that he did or did not pay taxes for a decade. Romney simply can't act like someone who's done nothing wrong when he's hiding his records from public scrutiny, and he doesn't have the moral high ground to feign outrage like this. If this becomes part of the Romney repertoire, it will backfire in a big way.

 

Comments (46) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Dougsf 1
In simpler times, this would have ended with a dual. Perhaps Reid should consider concocting his retort for the inevitable slap from a men's Dressage glove he'll be receiving.
Posted by Dougsf on August 2, 2012 at 4:06 PM
2
"It's Reid's word against Romney's."

Actually it's Romney's word against "a rumor that Reid heard." If Romney coughs up his taxes and it's all legit, Reid can just say "I guess the rumor was false."
Posted by GermanSausage on August 2, 2012 at 4:13 PM
You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me 3
Right. Because in Obama's America you're guilty until proven innocent and you have no right to confront your accuser.
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on August 2, 2012 at 4:19 PM
4
What a world we live in... even after Obama has shown both forms of his birth certificate he's still subject to an assumption of guilt (why haven't we seen his academic records? WHAT IS HE HIDING??), but Romney doesn't even have to show more than one year of tax returns because "of course" there's nothing to see there, and we should all just trust his word on that. Of course.
Posted by Nitidiuscula on August 2, 2012 at 4:25 PM
5
I'm with Mitt on this one. He might be an asshole, and he's being stupid, but if Reid's unwilling to say who told him this, he should have kept his mouth shut. It's not a message that does us any good.
Posted by NateMan on August 2, 2012 at 4:26 PM
blip 6
In everyone's America, Mitt Romney is the only person who has the information to put this rumor to rest. He's not on trial, he's running for president.
Posted by blip on August 2, 2012 at 4:26 PM
venomlash 7
@3: Nothing to do with Obama; that's just the court of public opinion. Which is how we also know that Obama is an Islamic extremist, Iraq was behind 9/11, and Glenn Beck raped and murdered a young girl in 1990.
Posted by venomlash on August 2, 2012 at 4:28 PM
Gay Dude for Romney 8
Why is Harry Reid risking further blemishes on his career, not to mention the cheapening of the stature of Senate Majority Leader, by turning the crank of the rumor mill right on the Senate floor? I mean, after all, if he did it as a guest on The View, I'd understand.

No wonder Congress's approval is even lower than Obama's.
Posted by Gay Dude for Romney http://mittromney.com on August 2, 2012 at 4:28 PM
9
Engaging Reid like this is so stupid of Romney.

Reid need only claim he was told in confidence and has asked his source to come forward, and then gets a golden opportunity to point out Mitt is the creator of this issue and need only release the documents to resolve it.

It's like Mitt wants to get smacked around again.
Posted by Twit. Git. Shit. on August 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM
10
Yeah, I'm kinda with Jon Stewart, this was a dick move on Reid's part: http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2…
Posted by Levislade http://ballofwax.org on August 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM
You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me 11
@8
Reid and Biden are in a protracted foot race to Kook-ville...
@5
By that logic we must assume that Obama had firsthand knowledge of all facets of Fast & Furious from the get go and tried to cover it up and that's why he's playing the Executive Privilege card... Right?
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on August 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM
Collin 12
@8 - You mean like an interview with the huffington post? Which is where Reid actually first talked about this... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/31…
Posted by Collin on August 2, 2012 at 4:35 PM
johnyawl 13
The retort is simple:
"Romney puts up, Reid shuts up - show us the returns."
Posted by johnyawl on August 2, 2012 at 4:36 PM
You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me 14
Oops.... I meant @6, not @5.
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on August 2, 2012 at 4:37 PM
15
Romney manages to keep the focus on his tax payments (or lack thereof) by responding.

(I'm hoping that when the presidential debates come around, Obama slips in a graceful congratulations to Romney and his wife for Rafalca's success at the Olympics.)
Posted by seatackled on August 2, 2012 at 4:43 PM
16
the bullshit is that a 0% tax rate is any worse than a 14% tax rate for a millionaire. I don't come close to that and pay something like a 23% rate.
Posted by MikeB on August 2, 2012 at 4:50 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 17

Ok, Paul Constant.

Then open up your bedroom and prove you don't have a stash of 10,000 kiddie porn photos.

Put up or shut up.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on August 2, 2012 at 4:56 PM
bleedingheartlibertarian 18
Look, I fucking hate Mitt Romney.

But this was a total dick move on Reid's part.
Posted by bleedingheartlibertarian on August 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM
Matt from Denver 19
YGBKM, when did you decide to be wrong all the time? There used to be a time when you wouldn't have posted some bullshit like @3, but now you're as bad as any christian claiming to be "losing rights" because LGBT are gaining theirs. You also used to be the kind of person who wouldn't slink away from posts like the Arkansas police thread - but then again, you never admitted that you think some people's lives are more valuable than others before.

It's sad to see that you really are just another wingnut. I'm starting to wonder if it's at all possible to be conservative AND respectful of others' rights as human beings. The two seem to be entirely exclusive.
Posted by Matt from Denver on August 2, 2012 at 5:00 PM
20
I seriously doubt Romney paid zero taxes for ten years. However it is very very likely that thanks to completely legal tax loopholes he managed to drive his effective tax rate down under 10% for many years, and even under 5% for a few.

Releasing his returns would shift the entire tax debate away from the preferred Republican/Norquest narrative of tax-cuts, tax-cuts, the solution to all our problems is tax-cuts. To one where we are all talking about the need to close corporate tax loopholes. Perhaps even to the point where we start talking about whether it even makes sense anymore to rely on income taxes as the prime source of government revenue when the real wealth of this nation is in the movement of capital.

That is why Romney is sitting on his tax returns. Income no longer drives wealth in this country, the movement of capital does. Releasing his returns would throw that into stark relief.

The problem with taxes in this country is we are taxing where the money is not. Romney knows this, he built his fortune off it, his tax returns would show it. He is afraid very afraid.
Posted by Machiavelli was framed on August 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM
Gay Dude for Romney 21
@19: Feel better now?
Posted by Gay Dude for Romney http://mittromney.com on August 2, 2012 at 5:39 PM
22
@19:

@21 tells you all you need to know.
Posted by seatackled on August 2, 2012 at 5:43 PM
Gay Dude for Romney 23
Oops disregard @21.
Posted by Gay Dude for Romney http://mittromney.com on August 2, 2012 at 5:43 PM
24
To all you "I hate Mitt, but this was a low blow":

Fuck that. I'm all for civility in politics too, but the Republicans prove time and again that they'll sink ever lower in order to win votes. What Reid did is child's play compared to what Republicans have done and are willing to do in the future.
Posted by MR M on August 2, 2012 at 6:05 PM
25
It's a dick move.
But it's also a shrewd political maneuver.
Romney is, again, talking about his taxes.
Romney is, again, refusing to release his tax information.

The Democrats are successfully casting Romney as a rich guy who is hiding something in his tax history that would hurt his campaign.

And Romney keeps falling for it.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on August 2, 2012 at 6:15 PM
26
And now CNN is confirming the story:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/02…

Where are your tax returns, Mitt?
Posted by Mike in Olympia on August 2, 2012 at 6:16 PM
27
Here's my theory: Mittens did pay some taxes. But he paid more to the LDS Church in tithing than he did to the government in taxes. When the left sees this proof, they're going to get angry about it. When the right sees this proof, they're also going to get angry, because Mittens was paying out to the 'wrong' kind of Christians.
Posted by R.Taylor on August 2, 2012 at 6:19 PM
28
Romney is not afraid. This just solidifies his base, and they don't care what taxes he paid or didn't pay. They don't care what he does because they hate Obama, and Romney is running against Obama.
Posted by sarah70 on August 2, 2012 at 6:19 PM
blip 29
@28 He'll need more than just his base to win.
Posted by blip on August 2, 2012 at 6:24 PM
30
#RomneysHiddenReturns
Posted by Romneys on August 2, 2012 at 7:11 PM
31
@20 Romney did not pay zero taxes for those 10 years. He paid taxes. They just weren't U.S. taxes. He paid taxes to at least three other countries and he used those to claim the foreign tax credit which reduced his U.S. federal obligations to, um... pretty much nothing.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on August 2, 2012 at 7:47 PM
long-time reader 32
Consider, if you will, my theory:

Mitt Romney knows he's got a snowball's chance in hell of winning this election. His tax returns show that he has obscene amounts of money and pays a lower tax rate than the average jizzmopper. If he releases his returns, he's still not going to win the election; but the shock of a real look at a gazillionaire's tax returns could be the catalyst for real tax reform, the elimination of loopholes made by and for rich assholes like him.

So the reason he doesn't release the returns is that it could result in him paying more tax--a fair amount of tax--and being slightly less obscenely wealthy. Still being just as obscenely wealthy is the consolation prize he feels he will need, post-election.
Posted by long-time reader on August 2, 2012 at 8:29 PM
33
Obviously, if he hasn't released them after all this talk that has gone as far back as the primaries, there is something seriously wrong in them. Maybe legal... but definitely unflattering. Ugly. Something he's willing to be dragged through the mud to protect.

I personally wouldn't be surprised - at all - if he hasn't paid anything in ten years, particularly in an era where policy has expressly favored the richest at the expense of the poor and middle class.

I agree with @20.
Posted by floater on August 2, 2012 at 8:51 PM
34
"No wonder Congress's approval is even lower than Obama's."

You're pretty bad at your PAC troll job.
Posted by mubhappy on August 2, 2012 at 8:54 PM
35
@32 We don't actually tax wealth. We only tax income. So, whatever the tax rates go up to, however much existing post-tax-paid money Romney has, he'll still have. New tax rates only affect new income, and any income added to wealth is yet more wealth.

Now, back in the old days, the King would send around his tax collector to take a percentage of your wealth. In today's terms that would be called a personal property tax, and I'm starting to think that's the way to deal with both the deficit and the super-rich.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on August 2, 2012 at 8:55 PM
36
@35 yes lets talk about the old days. In the old days we raised revenue for the common good, the government, things like roads, police and fire departments, by taxing property. Why? Because that is where the money was.

Then the industrial revolution happened and folks moved off the farms and started making money by working in factories earning income. So the focus of taxation shifted to that.

The industrial revolution ended and we entered the technology revolution and the age of an interconnected global economy. Now a rational response would be to shift the focus of taxation to follow the money. oops.

note. Yes I know in colonial America the federal government generated its income through lotteries as well. Lotteries still exist funding State and local governments but going there would just be a distraction. And yes I am over simplifying my argument.
Posted by Machiavelli was framed on August 2, 2012 at 9:18 PM
37
Here's the story with Dana Bash comments on ac360 and her anon source that fills out 26's link.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/02…

Think she is right, Reid knows knows the answer to what Romney is hiding.
Posted by Large Hardon Colluder on August 2, 2012 at 9:30 PM
Max Solomon 38
i sure enjoy reading you republics twisting yourself in knots defending willard. only 1 person can settle the issue and it's not reid. thanks for keeping the topic alive, though!
Posted by Max Solomon on August 2, 2012 at 9:48 PM
39
I guess it's not too late for Romney to drop out and the Republicans can nominate Ron Paul at the convention. Wouldn't that be worth a laugh?
Posted by GermanSausage on August 2, 2012 at 9:57 PM
40
Oh man, Swift Boating somebody sucks, doesn't it, Republicans? I wonder where your outrage was two presidential elections ago?

Oh wait, you didn't give a shit. Fuck you, (especially you, Bailo) and payback's a bitch. Now cry me some crocodile tears, you worthless skin sacs!
Posted by FonsieScheme on August 2, 2012 at 10:40 PM
watchout5 41
I want the people in this comment thread defending Mitt Romney to read their comment out loud. Sure, in a perfect world maybe what Reid did was wrong, but we don't live in anything close to a perfect world. If the tables were turned could anyone realistically see Romney holding back on a rumor that Obama faked his birth certificate? Reid takes the political fallback for what amounts to a school yard rumor, and Romney could end all the speculation AND put Reid in his political place by proving him wrong and then owning the issue. Anyone else think this is an indication that it's far worse than just not paying taxes? Anyone think Romney has been making money off the government? I'm willing to entertain this rumor till I'm blue in the face, I don't give a fuck I can live with myself if I lied about Romney.
Posted by watchout5 http://www.overclockeddrama.com on August 2, 2012 at 10:53 PM
42
@40

This isn't swiftboating.
Posted by seatackled on August 2, 2012 at 11:54 PM
Pridge Wessea 43
@42 - not exactly, but it is in the sense that it's a hardball move designed to show a flaw in character.
Posted by Pridge Wessea on August 3, 2012 at 3:11 AM
44
It's awful when Republicans do it. It's awful when Democrats do it. Bad behavior is bad behavior and partisan thinking is what makes it hard to see this simple truth.

That's why Jon Stewart rocks. He's a Democrat, but that doesn't prevent him from valuing basic human decency over sticking it to Republicans.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/02…
Posted by LJM on August 3, 2012 at 10:30 AM
Will in Seattle 45
We all know Comrade Mitt is a Felon, no matter what Amnesty he got from the IRS.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 3, 2012 at 12:34 PM
46
Finally. A democrat who's willing to get his hands dirty. Harry Reid has been too timid for too long and I'm glad to see him throw a punch rather than taking whatever the GOP cares to slap him with this week.
Posted by montex on August 5, 2012 at 9:07 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy