Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

He Makes Sure Homophobes on Twitter Get the Attention They Need

Posted by on Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:09 PM

homophobetweets.jpg

You need a thick gay skin if you're gonna to follow @homophobes on Twitter.

The man behind @homophobes—let's call him TMB@H for short—searches Twitter for hateful anti-gay tweets, which he turns around and re-tweets to his 8500 followers. TMB@H's in his early twenties, lives in the United States, and is lucky enough to be working in his chosen field... and that’s as much personal information as TMB@H is comfortable divulging. I met TMB@H in person at a big gay thing we both happened to be attending sometime over the last twelve months... and that's as specific as TMB@H wants me to get about when and where we met. (You would jealously guard your privacy too if pissing off violently homophobic bigots was your hobby.) We spoke by phone about what he hopes to accomplish with @homophobes.

······················

What motivated you start @homophobes?

A couple of years ago some law passed, something related to gay marriage, and I wanted to see what people were saying about it on Twitter. So I did a search and I found this one guy who said something really horrible—gay people are all sick and we don’t deserve to get married or something like that—and I re-tweeted him from my own account. A lot of my friends started talking about this guy’s tweet and some of them tweeted replies to him. That’s when I thought, “Oh, it might be a good idea to create an account to just do this, to re-tweet homophobes.” Just for kicks I checked to see if “@homophobes” was available as a Twitter name. I was surprised that it was. I really scored there.

Your account info says, “Giving homophobes the attention they’re looking for.” What kind of attention do you hope the homophobes you re-tweet get?

A lot of these people have never been challenged before. They say these things because they’ve heard them, or it’s what their friends all think, or it’s what their parents told them. They’ve literally never been challenged before. All their friends feel the same way! When I re-tweet them and people respond, maybe it will make them think about what they’re saying for the first time. And then maybe they’ll think twice before tweeting something like that again.

There have been a few people who’ve gone back and deleted their homophobic tweets. And there have been some people who apologized for their homophobic tweets. That’s only happened a few times. But being re-tweeted by @homophobes has changed a few people.

Any advice for your followers who might want to respond to a homophobe you’ve re-tweeted?

Sometimes when people respond they’ll say really offensive things to the homophobes. That doesn’t help. But there are people who engage the homophobes in real conversations. Some of the homophobes get defensive and yell back. But some of them think about it. They actually respond to the people who've responded to them, and sometimes you can see them thinking it through. So my advice would be to argue with them, to challenge them, but in a respectful way. Don’t yell at them.

They say nothing cures someone’s homophobia faster than meeting a gay person. What you’re doing is introducing many of these homophobes to gay people for the first time in their lives.

I am, yes, that’s a big part of what I’m doing. And if you want to engage with someone I’ve re-tweeted, if you reply or them or DM [direct message] them, the best thing to do is ask them to explain their position. Most of them have a lot of trouble explaining why they feel the way they do because because they’ve never really thought about it. Their homophobia is based on so little! Getting them to have that conversation, and drawing them out, can really change their minds.

How do you find homophobic tweets?

I have a long list of saved searches. If someone uses the phrase “gay people” in a tweet, it’s usually negative. The same goes for, “If I had a gay son.” Those can be really depressing. Then there’s “gay abomination,” “gay marriage” and, of course, any combination of “gay” and “bible.” And I have a search on “no offense.” So many people will say, “no offense,” right before saying something really offensive. And followers send me tweets.

You’re a gay man. Doesn’t wading through homophobic insults and 140-character anti-gay rants all day get to you? Some of the stuff you find is really violent.

It doesn’t faze me. Some of the things these people say are just so stupid. It makes me realize how stupid these people are. Their arguments are so stupid. It makes me laugh.

Do you regard @homophobes as a form of activism?

Yeah, definitely. One of the valuable things about this thing is that there are a lot of people out there who don’t think homophobia is a problem or that it can’t really be that bad. Even some gay people out there think homophobia isn’t a problem. Maybe they grew up in towns that were really gay friendly, or they never had any problems with bullying, or their parents never gave them any grief about it. But even some gay people don’t realize how bad it can be.

Imagine being the kid of someone who sent out one of those “If I had a gay son” tweets. Or one of those violently homophobic #ToMyUnBornChild tweets.

Right. Seeing these real tweets that come up every day can make people realize that homophobia is still a real problem and that it hurts real people.

 

Comments (30) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
edie murphy beverly hills have eyes cleary 1
except major FAIL because the twit captured in this post is apparently a gay male high school kid that was ranting because his ex-boyfriend took another guy to prom.
Posted by edie murphy beverly hills have eyes cleary on July 3, 2012 at 1:30 PM
2
He says "But being re-tweeted by @homophobes has changed a few people." I'd really like to hear that story, because reading these people makes that hard to imagine.
Posted by Politely skeptical on July 3, 2012 at 1:31 PM
biffp 3
Is 'your dumb' an ironic Twitter joke or is Alex Gil a fucktard? Unfortunately, the discourse on human rights in this country operates at this level. God forbid thoughtful and caring individuals should have a spot on CNN and MSNBC - much better TV to just keep the hate machine debate raging on and on.
Posted by biffp on July 3, 2012 at 1:33 PM
icouldliveinhope 4
lol "if that makes sense"
Posted by icouldliveinhope on July 3, 2012 at 1:35 PM
gloomy gus 5
Very much in line with the view of tweets as public proclamations not belonging in any sense to the creator. A judge has ordered Twitter to turn over all tweets by someone accused of something or other having to do with Occupy. The creator (and the ACLU and Twitter) argued he has ownership enough to resist having to disclose them, but the court said more or less that Twitter is like a light pole at 11th & Pike - once you staple your flier to the pole anyone can do whatever they want with it - not just the text but, in the case of law enforcement, the location you posted it from. "What you give to the public belongs to the public", said the judge. I'd be surprised if Twitter doesn't appeal.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/0…
Posted by gloomy gus on July 3, 2012 at 1:53 PM
6
Is there a direct link between homophobia & lack of grammar skills? 'Cause that's what I'm getting from this.
Posted by moo http://doitforthegirls.com/ on July 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM
Reverse Polarity 7
I don't know how he does this. I could not read that crap for any length of time an not get to me. Reading that shit for an hour would make me depressed for days.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on July 3, 2012 at 2:04 PM
8
if i had a child, i would want it to be this person.
Posted by Adrian Ryan on July 3, 2012 at 2:14 PM
Fortunate 9
"Is there a direct link between homophobia & lack of grammar skills?"

Yes.
Posted by Fortunate on July 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM
10
I believe that homophobia and poor writing mechanics (it's not really grammar) are linked through their common roots in the rich and stinky fertilizer of ignorance. And some of it is using language as an identity marker. They get two identity markers in one tweet - homophobic identity and defiant non-standard mechanics identity!

This stuff is so ugly. I don't think I could bear up for more than 20 minutes.
Posted by LuisitaPhD on July 3, 2012 at 2:56 PM
Ziggity 11
There was an awesome Twitter account called "anti-racist dog" that would reply to racist tweets with "Woof woof awoooo!" and such. It got suspended for some reason, but it was always hilarious seeing the authors write back to the dog account and try to justify their original tweets as non-racist.
Posted by Ziggity on July 3, 2012 at 3:10 PM
evilvolus 12
@6, @9 "Is there a direct link between homophobia & lack of grammar skills?" -

No, but there's a direct link between Twitter and shitty writing.
Posted by evilvolus on July 3, 2012 at 3:28 PM
ScienceNerd 13
Oh yikes, these are all bad. I read the #tomyunbornchild.

My "favorite" one is "#ToMyUnbornChild if your a girl i will drown you in the bathtub, and if your a guy and your turn into a faggot ill kill you" because it embodies what TMB@H is saying about not thinking. I mean, aren't the two things the same? I think the tweeter(twitterer) may need to know that when you drown someone they die.

and seriously, what's up with the "your" usage?
Posted by ScienceNerd on July 3, 2012 at 3:34 PM
mydriasis 14
@6

Lack of education.
Posted by mydriasis on July 3, 2012 at 3:37 PM
long-time reader 15
@6, lack of critical thinking. They're unable or unwilling to criticize their own writing to find the errors, and they likewise don't criticize the homophobic dogma they've absorbed from their surroundings. As far as I'm concerned, this also explains why agnostics appear to be more intelligent than religious folk, in the aggregate (and yes, I'm aware of the hazard of confirmation bias).
Posted by long-time reader on July 3, 2012 at 4:28 PM
16
I generally have a knee-jerk hatred of all things Twitter but this is just great. Dude should get a medal or something for the ability to wade through all that crap without his head exploding.
Posted by teamcanada on July 3, 2012 at 4:47 PM
17
Ha ha! And it's not like this guy is violating people's privacy. They've put their words out on Twitter for all to see.

Who knew that Twitter could be used for serious social purposes?
Posted by DRF on July 3, 2012 at 5:02 PM
GlamB0t 18
I don't know how he does it. People can be so cruel and vile.

What astounds me are the people saying ridiculous things with their real names and pictures on their accounts.

Posted by GlamB0t on July 3, 2012 at 5:39 PM
19
Totes one of the best folks to follow on Twitter. Looooove it!
Posted by enotsehc on July 3, 2012 at 6:51 PM
20
Bother. Now I'm tempted to actually use my twitter account to make positive, competently typed, messages using TMB@H 's search terms.
Posted by EclecticEel on July 3, 2012 at 8:46 PM
DAVIDinKENAI 21
The fact that people will attach their names to such hateful ignorance is telling about the state of homophobia in some social groups. They seem to tend young (or be asshats like Newt) where a certain group-think is pervausive. People around them are being hateful so they try to keep up or best them by being more hateful.

Compare that to racism, which certainly still exists, but in boarder circles those idiots have learned to shut up. They know it's not acceptable and they don't want to be looked down on so they STFU. One result being that racism is not promulgated as much to the next generation as homophobia has been.

It's great that someone is calling them on it. In my kids' K-6, they were taught to consider, "Is it true, is it kind, it is neccesary?" before saying something. TMB@H enforces the helpful standard, "Would you like it on the front page?".
Posted by DAVIDinKENAI on July 3, 2012 at 9:07 PM
fannerz 22
Of all the #unborn tweets, the "if you're a girl or you're gay..." made me the most depressed. But it really shows that homophobia and misogyny are flip sides of the same coin. People just hate things that challenge the status quo; in this case, heteronormative patriarchy.
Posted by fannerz on July 3, 2012 at 9:36 PM
mydriasis 23
@21

Okay a couple things.

1. You think homophobia is more common in young people than old people? Are you joking? They're just more vocal and more likely to be on twitter.

2. You think racists have learned to shut up? Have you seen the internet?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-40-ab…
Posted by mydriasis on July 3, 2012 at 9:57 PM
BEG 24
I really can't engage them respectfully. If he can talk with fuckwits like this, more power to him. I just want them fucking gone and out of my life and the lives of my friends & family. These are the same scum who deny hospital visits, who swoop in and remove assets because it wasn't a real marriage and so on. Screw 'em.
Posted by BEG http://twitter.com/#!/browneyedgirl65 on July 3, 2012 at 11:15 PM
25 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy
26
Twitter is the ideal forum for homophobia, because if any of these people tried to explain their positions beyond 140 characters, their little heads would explode.

I just started following this. I'd like to engage one of the idiots in debate, but I probably won't, because it might be too hard for me to do so without at one point typing "FUCK YOU."
Posted by Daniel_NY on July 4, 2012 at 1:54 PM
27
Oh come on 12. Sure, the 140 character limit leads to lots of abbreviations, but a good writer can construct a thoughtful, mostly mechanically correct statement in that brief space. While my friends might use "u" or "b/c" to reduce their characters, they would never misuse your/you're or their/there/they're. Them are stupid people...
Posted by Ms. D on July 4, 2012 at 3:45 PM
Free Lunch 28
@5 - Good info, gloomy gus. Thanks.
Posted by Free Lunch on July 4, 2012 at 5:09 PM
29
Just to play devil's advocate couldn't this backfire. I mean if I didn't like a group of people and suddenly they were all sending me nasty tweets, I'm not sure I'd change my attitude. I know the purpose is not to write nasty retorts, but I doubt that all his followers are polite and try to engage in meaningful conversation. I agree that meeting a gay person can change people's minds but I'm skeptical that 'meeting' them thru a 140 character message is as positively effective.
Posted by Andrewhg on July 4, 2012 at 10:02 PM
30
For those who are talking shit about people's grammar: All grammar abilities, or lack thereof indicate is level of education. Many people do not have access to quality education (thus the lack of critical thinking skills that goes along with any bigotry). Just because you had access to quality education which granted you better writing and critical thinking skills does not make you a better person, it just makes you more lucky.

That's why I think TMB@H is actually providing an important service. We are given the opportunity to help educate the masses. Don't squander this opportunity by complaining to the person about their lack of writing skills, because at the end of the day, it doesn't really matter.

If you really want to see improvement, write to your elected representatives about improving our educational system. We have yet to have the patience to allow funding to follow an entire generation to see improvement. Instead, if we don't see improvement in a year, or a few years, we cut funding, because we perceive that it's not doing enough good. This isn't actually enough time to have a large enough impact. Seriously, this is a big thing we should be concentrating on to ensure that the next generation has the ability to question authority and make changes.
Posted by DarthKelly on July 11, 2012 at 7:21 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy