Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, June 29, 2012

Ted: Like a More Ribald ALF

Posted by on Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM

Ted is brought to you by Axe Body Spray. That ought to fire off some warning shots, right there.
  • Ted is brought to you by Axe Body Spray. That ought to fire off some warning shots, right there.
It’s not that Ted is especially offensive. Sure, there are rape jokes, terrorism jokes, and a couple of particularly heinous ethnic stereotypes. Someone is sure to be offended by this thing. (I thought the caricature of an Asian neighbor was too much, for what it’s worth.) But that’s not anything special: if you create something, someone is always sure to be offended. No, the problem I have with Ted is the same problem I have with most of writer/director Seth MacFarlane’s other work: It’s just a huge fucking pile of jokes.

I can hear you say, “Well, so what? Aren’t most comedies, hopefully, a huge fucking pile of jokes?” And the answer to your question is, “no.” A good comedy is a series of jokes, and the jokes work together in service to a story. They advance the story, they fill out the story—think of a good musical, replace the songs with jokes, and you have an idea of what I mean. Bridesmaids was a great comedy because it was a series of well-crafted jokes about characters and their interactions. Hell, even a good stand-up set from, say, Louis C.K. is a series of jokes that construct a story about a fictionalized Louis C.K. They may feel randomly placed, but every joke has a reason to be there.

Instead, Ted is a crappy framework of a movie—about a grown man (Mark Wahlberg) whose childhood teddy bear came to life—with a bunch of jokes stuck to it. You’ve got pop culture jokes, self-aware jokes about what a flimsy premise the movie has, and gay panic jokes. Some of the jokes are funny. But many of them aren’t. And none of them are essential to the story, because the story is incredibly inessential.

***

According to modern popular cinema, the single greatest problem that the United States faces in the 21st century is youngish white men who just can’t manage to grow up and accept adult responsibilities.

Almost every comedy in the last ten years is about a man-child who has to learn to grow up and find responsible adult love while still retaining his essential man-childness. The American moviegoing public supposedly can’t get enough of that fucking story; we’ll go see it again and again and again.

John, Mark Wahlberg’s character in Ted, is the man-child of the week. His childhood is manifested in Ted, a teddy bear that came to life because of a wish John made when he was a boy and then just stuck around. But! John needs to grow up because he’s in love with a great woman (Mila Kunis) who wants him to grow up. But! Ted wants John to keep doing childish things—snort coke, fuck hookers, and make fun of bad movies—with him. And! A creepy man (Giovanni Ribisi) wants to kidnap Ted and keep him for himself.

If you are at or above a fifth-grade reading level, you can probably put these three sentences together into a screenplay pretty easily. The characters in Ted make fun of movies like this—crappy, cliched by-the-numbers tripe—and they’re starring in a movie just like the movies they make fun of. Somehow, the smirk Ted puts on is supposed to make that all right. It doesn’t.

***

At least the acting is pretty good. Wahlberg, for some unknown reason, is convincing as an idiot with a Boston accent. Kunis dives gamely into the sausagefest and rolls around in it with great enthusiasm. And Ribisi’s stalker is an excellent remount of a very well-worked-over stereotype. The cast’s devotion to the weak material—and the excellent CGI powering the Ted effects, with his threadbare patches from years of cuddling—are enough to momentarily make you forget how bad it all is. But then one of those lame, defensive self-aware jokes pop up—someone mentions that Ted sounds just like Peter Griffin from MacFarlane’s Family Guy, someone refers to Ted’s resemblance to ALF—and you remember that you’re watching a bad movie. No matter how good a couple of the jokes are, you can’t shake the feeling that there’s an unforgivable laziness behind Ted.

 

Comments (30) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
So, you like it then.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 29, 2012 at 12:45 PM
2
"unforgivable laziness" - isn't that the state of nearly all American cinema?

Filmmakers forget this, over and over, if it's not on the page, it won't be on the screen.
Posted by westello on June 29, 2012 at 12:50 PM
Zebes 3
Kunis dives gamely into the sausagefest and rolls around in it with great enthusiasm.


NICE. *leers knowingly, high fives nearest McFarlane-voiced talking animal sidekick*
Posted by Zebes http://www.badrap.org/rescue/index.html on June 29, 2012 at 12:56 PM
stirwise 4
I read this headline as "Ted: like a more rabid ALF" (emphasis mine). That's way funnier.
Posted by stirwise on June 29, 2012 at 1:34 PM
Max Solomon 5
Bridesmaids has a series of very funny jokes & characters wrapped around a sentimental story - loveable loser finds self. It was funny when it wasn't being maudlin. And it was maudlin A LOT>

Was The Hangover maudlin?

No it was not. It was a pile of jokes.
Posted by Max Solomon on June 29, 2012 at 1:40 PM
stuckie 6
Lazy screenwriting - like that time I hired William Shatner to direct my Cialis commercial! [jump cut]
Posted by stuckie on June 29, 2012 at 1:42 PM
pg13 7
I grew up on Caddyshack, Stripes, Airplane! etc.

Definitely piles and piles of jokes...but each had, to some degree, a story to hang those jokes upon...a story with consequences.

I don't mind a pile of jokes. I don't even mind a movie where you could tell the script was just an outline and talented improv-experienced performers just trusted their instincts (though, I hope that movie has a great editor.)

As far as Ted goes--ehhhhh, I'll probably catch it a few years from now when it comes to Netflix streaming.
Posted by pg13 on June 29, 2012 at 2:04 PM
Posted by Knat on June 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM
9
What is Ted?
A miserable little pile of jokes.
Posted by lortext on June 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM
10
i have the same problem with family guy
Posted by judybrowni on June 29, 2012 at 3:18 PM
11
@4,

Me too. He ate one too many cats.
Posted by keshmeshi on June 29, 2012 at 3:27 PM
12
This movie reminds me of a tv show that was on WB or UPN years ago (the name escapes me) that was essentially Married With Children with a talking stuffed bunny that talked only to the dad.
Posted by WestSeven on June 29, 2012 at 6:27 PM
biju 13
Am I the only person who disliked bridesmaids
Posted by biju on June 29, 2012 at 6:28 PM
14
@12 (I can't believe my brain is still polluted with this crap but...)Unhappily ever after? (Srsly UPN is a cancer upon the earth)
Posted by lone locust on June 29, 2012 at 6:37 PM
switzerblog 15
@13 No, you're not. Bridesmaids was not a great comedy. It was an okay comedy that we are required to think is great COZ WOMEN DID IT proving that they don't need our validation or something.

Personally, I think it's okay to say something was just okay without disparaging the funny and talented women who were involved in it. But that's just me.
Posted by switzerblog on June 29, 2012 at 7:53 PM
16
why is it wrong that "accepting responsibility" is a large theme in modern film? it's literally the climactic value of 99% of all stories. the protagonist accepts responsibility for something and takes final climactic action to resolve the story.

it's also giant mistake to think that the "man-child" story/archetype is anything new, or indicative of the stagnancy of modern popular culture in the "last ten years"

Marx Brothers - man-children
I Love Lucy - woman-child
Woody Allen - man-child
Murray/Ramis/Belushi - man-children
Seinfeld - man-children

You even cite Bridesmaids and Louis CK's routines as examples of good comedy, when they are completely based around the woman/man-child archetype that you are apparently sick of. Throughout Bridesmaids, Wiig's childish and irresponsible nature puts her at odds with the other characters. In the end, she finds responsible adult love with the police officer and yet retains her woman-childness (she fucking dances to Wilson-Philips). And Louis CK is a erudite inter-city liberal artist who Tweets about dicks, shit, AIDS, and Jews. His whole comedy is about his grown-up liberal nature being at odds with his offensive childishness. Come on!

Your analysis about comedy is contradictory and painful. It's obviously okay to like one thing and not another thing. (I like The Fifth Element and I don't like Blade Runner.) But your writing is neither thoughtful nor entertaining. It's sloppy and second-rate.
Posted by Skit on June 29, 2012 at 10:58 PM
17
@14 I was thinking "Greg the Bunny."
Posted by capicola on June 29, 2012 at 11:49 PM
18
@16 C'mon, didn't you read the review? It's not just that it's a bildungsroman, but one with jokes just haphazardly PILED UP, not at all neatly ordered or bound securely to the plot with ligatures. To obliquely reference an equally unforgivably lazy and haphazard comedy, that sort of sloppy joke application, "That's how we get ants."

My problem with this review is that the criticisms are just piled on. By way of contrast, if you read Armond White's review of "A.I. Artificial Intelligence"* you'll see there's a series of pompous bloviations forming a cohesive and hilarious whole.

*Talk about a creepy and annoying Teddy.
Posted by capicola on June 30, 2012 at 12:24 AM
Zebes 19
Oh my gosh, this thread is just like that time I was in some completely unrelated situation with a celebrity.

*fart jokes, another animated spin-off*
Posted by Zebes http://www.badrap.org/rescue/index.html on June 30, 2012 at 2:02 AM
Cato the Younger Younger 20
MacFarlane has had a few moments in Family Guy early on but he is wearing really thin, almost as annoying as Aaron Sorkin and Bill Maher. They just rehash the same routine in comedy and drama over and over again to the point of being so predictable even an ape gets bored with the material.

Just goes to show you even our side of the political spectrum is capable of putting out tons of shit.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on June 30, 2012 at 8:37 AM
Ipso Facto 21
Ted talks?
Posted by Ipso Facto http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/voterocky/pages/602/attachments/original/1348622109/fbcomic_copy.png?1348622109 on June 30, 2012 at 4:35 PM
22
Family Guy has given me some laughs, but I'm not a devoted fan. That being said, I think Seth MacFarlane is extremely talented. He's a writer, voice actor, director, animator, and a pretty great singer. He was also stinking rich by the time he was 30-something. For having created an "unforgivably lazy" film, he seems like the opposite of lazy.
Posted by Amanda on July 1, 2012 at 1:18 AM
23
Honestly? I think you could attribute "abject laziness" to Seth McFarlane's work in Gamily Guy past season 4- but there is a lot of really great material in American Dad. And though even that show can spiral off into lame random joke tangents that stall/flatline the episode progression- for the most part it does a great job focusing its humor on the story and not random cutscenes or movie re-enactments.

Credit where credit is due: not all of his work may be good, but Seth McFarlane is a talented guy who does have the capacity to create entertaining and even sometimes poignant humorous stories.
Posted by Aedan Robinson on July 1, 2012 at 8:11 AM
24
Just saw the film and it was totally entertaining and funny. The Stranger doesn't like anything too mainstream, so this review isn't a surprise.
Posted by Amanda on July 1, 2012 at 10:46 PM
25
@14 You're thinking of Unhappily Ever After
Posted by alldflavors on July 2, 2012 at 4:30 PM
Theodore Gorath 26
Why does the fact that Axe body spray was the highest bidder for the endorsement mean this movie has to be crap? I have seen this criticism elsewhere, and it makes no sense to me.

The movie was obviously written with young males in mind, and Axe was simply the young male product that offered the most cash. It has nothing to do with anything else.

Now as to why Axe still exists, that is a whole other issue.
Posted by Theodore Gorath on July 3, 2012 at 7:23 AM
27
_Ted_ was hilarious. I guess I don't mind some of my comedies to be a pile of jokes. Sure, sometimes I like my comedy to be a little less...funny(?) and a little more situational, but MacFarlane knows how to play with the balance even as it teeters a little too far to one side.

The fantastic _Airplane!_ reference in this movie was especially apt. I remember many people who HATED _Airplane!_ because it was just an assault of jokes and puns. I love a movie like _Airplane!_ or like _Ted_ because sometimes you just want to go in, turn off your overworked brain, and laugh like you haven't laughed in awhile. I will watch _Ted_ again not because it's brilliant cinema but because it serves its purpose like many movies before it: it's funny.
Posted by Marco Macro on July 3, 2012 at 7:43 AM
28
Those of you who liked this movie, was it better than the trailers? Because the trailers made it look really fucking stupid, but I like Seth Macfarlane. But I also mostly hate the new Family Guy episodes so I'm on the fence about seeing this.

I was wondering if it would be like The Dictator, which was awful for a Sasha Baron Cohen film.
Posted by L:ooks Really Bad, But... on July 3, 2012 at 7:55 AM
29
@16, your over-use of "quote marks" is neither correct nor entertaining.

Folks, the review is a about the movie, not McFarlane's career.

Yes, hes amazingly talented.
No, this movie has no plot.
Yes, it is the height of laziness to produce a half-assed movie, especially since Seth IS so farging talented. He could have worked a little harder to develop the story, bu he KNOWS it will be a moneymaker regardless of the effort put into it. He knows this because he's blazing hot (at least with 18-25 males) and those bastards are all going to see it at least once. Now he doesn't have to work so hard anymore.
I'd call that lazy.
Posted by portland scribe on July 3, 2012 at 6:19 PM
30
I am so disappointed! I thought this was the movie in where physicists working at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider discovered a new subatomic particle, a potential key to an understanding of why elementary particles have mass and indeed to the existence of diversity and life in the universe.

Instead it was a CGI-animated former rapper making dick jokes (with a stuffed animal). I should’ve stormed out of the theater, but there were far too many other scientists sitting in close proximity to me.

Are we still talking about Medea?
Posted by on the one on July 4, 2012 at 3:22 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy