Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Sunbathing Ladies Take Note: Nudity Is Not Illegal in Seattle

Posted by on Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:56 PM

Hear ye, hear ye, women of Seattle: Since writing a few weeks ago that going topless in Seattle isn't a crime (in and of itself), I've been contacted by a few women who claim they've been harassed by Seattle police for appearing topless in public, most notably while sunbathing at Dykiki beach.

Seattle doesn't have its own indecent exposure law—police enforce state policy. Here's a handy explanation of the state law, courtesy of SPD's own blog:

Washington’s indecent exposure law makes it a misdemeanor to “make any open and obscene exposure of his or her person or the person of another knowing that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm.” In other words, there must be lewd or obscene behavior for an officer to take action. In order for the police to make an arrest, we must have witnesses currently in the public place where the nudity is occurring who must make a complaint. These witnesses must be willing to appear in court. Also in order to prosecute, the burden is on the government to prove that the offender was knowingly aware that their conduct created alarm and offense of others.

Obviously, there are plenty of people willing to be both naked and obscene in public at the same time. I'm not talking about those people. I'm addressing all the salt-of-the-earth nudists out there, the women who simply want to strip off their top and work on their farmer's tan from time to time. The long and short for these women is: Exposing your breasts isn't obscene unless you also happen to be gyrating on a mechanical bull or milking yourself (for fun, not babies) or something.

NSFW image and business card after the jump...

Free and breezy feels so fine...
  • Free and breezy feels so fine...
Which is why Fremont residents can make any excuse to get naked and run around in public—Solstice, Halloween run, Valentine's Day run, Sunday brunch—without being hauled in by police.

However! Police and normal folk alike can be unreasonable dicks when it comes to women and the daily choices they make with their bodies. And, frankly, no one likes arguing (least of all with cops) whilst topless. It feels a little too vulnerable. So, here's a handy business-card (YAY4BOOBS.pdf), courtesy of me and the perennially awesome Mary Traverse, that you can print out and slip into your wallet to flash at anyone who hassles you.

 

Comments (20) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me 1
I assume this applies to bottomless boys too... Right?
Good to know.
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on June 27, 2012 at 3:03 PM
Will in Seattle 2
Where do you put the wallet if bottomless? Your sun hat?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 27, 2012 at 3:06 PM
gloomy gus 3
My new coworker just strolled past and she gave me the side-eye over them there front-boobs.
Posted by gloomy gus on June 27, 2012 at 3:06 PM
schmacky 4
yes, yes...but you still have to put a NSFW on this.
Posted by schmacky on June 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM
Cienna Madrid 5
@3 That warms my cockles. If them boobs get you fired, I'll buy you a drink.
Posted by Cienna Madrid on June 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM
Cienna Madrid 6
@4, On second thought, I've moved the image to avoid having to buy all of you drinks.
Posted by Cienna Madrid on June 27, 2012 at 3:11 PM
The_Shaved_Bear 7
More naked boobies makes the world a better place!
Posted by The_Shaved_Bear on June 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM
8
So if I'm offended by a topless guy, the police won't do anything because that is not "reasonable" but if I'm offended by a topless woman, I can have her fined? Assuming I'm equally offended in either case and willing to testify, the law on the face of it is sexist and possibly unconstitutional.
Posted by wxPDX on June 27, 2012 at 3:29 PM
9
How about only attractive women in Seattle can go topless. You know, the 1%.
Posted by Too many fugly womyn in this town on June 27, 2012 at 3:30 PM
Callie 10
I'm not sure you understand what a "farmer's tan" is.
Posted by Callie http://www.facebook.com/Klosetnerd on June 27, 2012 at 3:45 PM
Dougsf 11
@9 - I can't imagine anything less that rugged good looks to go with all that charm you're oozing.

Calling the cops on boobs is just wrong on so many levels.

Posted by Dougsf on June 27, 2012 at 3:46 PM
yelahneb 12
Ladies, I stand ready to support your boobs.
Posted by yelahneb http://www.strangebutharmless.com on June 27, 2012 at 3:49 PM
Matt from Denver 13
You know, if someone's going to get in the face of a topless woman for revealing her boobs, I don't think a card featuring more boobs is going to mollify that person or otherwise diffuse the situation.
Posted by Matt from Denver on June 27, 2012 at 3:50 PM
Matthew Richter 14
@13 FTW
Posted by Matthew Richter http://www.xomonline.com on June 27, 2012 at 4:13 PM
treacle 15
I strongly suspect that it's not other members of the public who are "getting in the face" of women exercising their freedom, it sounds like it's the cops taking it upon themselves to harass the bosom-havers.

I recall a nice sunny afternoon at a very calm discreet location not far from Dykiki Beach, which is a known nudist beach. A gentleman swam out a bit beyond his abilities and got stuck at the buoy. A police boat eventually came by, hauled him aboard (nude), helped him warm up a bit, gave him a ticket for swimming where he shouldn't, and then said (as he reported to the rest of us - after the cops had looked as sternly at us as they could from 20 meters out) "We're going to have to do something about that beach." Clearly indicating they were opposed to nude people being nude amongst themselves, and bothering no one. Why should they care? Morality police much?
Posted by treacle on June 27, 2012 at 4:22 PM
16
#1: Yeah, somehow I suspect dick-wagging isn't allowed.
Posted by Jizzlobber on June 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM
biffp 17
@9, I've never complained on the beach in Europe - not once. It would be nice if the ladies could try to monitor the pubes growing out of the areolae though.
Posted by biffp on June 27, 2012 at 8:18 PM
18
@17 you realize that we ladies don't go topless for your pleasure? It's my own damn business where I have hair. And I'm pretty sure nipple hair isn't pubic by definition. In short, go fuck yourself and your notions of what kinds of female bodies are worth displaying.
Posted by wxPDX on June 27, 2012 at 11:32 PM
19
Well said, 18. Every body should have a right to wear or not wear whatever they want, without the constant policing of douchbags and morality police. Bare your body or not, as you see fit, for you are your own person.
Posted by Montezuma's revenge on November 1, 2012 at 7:28 PM
20
Nude boarding for air travel. Saves a lot of time not being searched.
Posted by manboobs on April 8, 2013 at 8:29 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy