Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, June 22, 2012

Off the Grid

Posted by on Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:25 AM

Time:

How can a six-story, 50,000-sq.-ft. office building in downtown Seattle function completely off the grid? The answer involves solar panels for energy, geothermal wells for heat, a giant rain cistern for water and composting toilets for keeping sewage out of everything else. The toilets were just installed at the Bullitt Center, which is set to be completed this fall. “You have to remember to flush before and after,” says Bullitt Foundation president and Earth Day founder Denis Hayes. “But that may be the single largest lifestyle change.”

What will life be like in the "Greenest Commercial Building in the World"?

Even with the building managing vital systems, users must make lifestyle changes, taking the stairs instead of the elevator, for instance, and choosing MacBook Air laptops — which pull less energy than a 100-watt bulb — over a desktop. As for those special toilets, their contents will get composted and decontaminated before being shipped off-site to be used as fertilizer.
My only thing: It seems so unsocial to be off the grid. I do not like the idea of a building or even a house being isolated and self-sufficient. This just doesn't feel right to me. This doesn't feel like what a city is supposed to be.

 

Comments (26) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
seanmichaelhurley 1
People, not buildings, are social. My (counter)intuition is that the formal isolation of such structures may enhance the social congress of citizens, although I could not say precisely how.
Posted by seanmichaelhurley http://seanmichaelhurley.blogspot.com on June 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM
You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me 2
What the fuck Chuck?!

“I do not like the idea of a building or even a house being isolated and self-sufficient. This just doesn't feel right to me.”

Marxists hate the self-sufficient… That explains it. That sums it all up.
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on June 22, 2012 at 9:07 AM
treacle 3
While there may be lower costs when electricity and waste removal is connected to the grid, it sure seems like making each building wholly responsible for it's energy consumption and waste production will bring increased awareness to the issues of energy and waste, where in the past humans (and buildings) have rather blithely ignored the issue and helped create the collective problems we have with these things.

Is it social to offload your garbage problems on other people/systems? Or is it more social --through increased responsibility-- to being an economical and neat urban citizen?
Posted by treacle on June 22, 2012 at 9:09 AM
Allyn 4
Having a building off the grid seems like a very social thing.

The residents will remember with every flush of the toilet, with each flight climbed, with every occ sensor they must wave at, that they are not alone; they and the people they share the building with are reliant on each other to maintain the planet.

When you don't have to think about where your electricity comes from, you can ignore the problem of fossil fuels and coal and nuclear and you'll be more likely to leave lights on, run your desktop and plasma tv and take the elevator. When you don't have to think about the contents of your toilet, you're more likely to waste more and you're so removed from the end results you don't think about all that goes into sewage treatment and where it all goes.

It seems that knowing you and your building mates are working together to maintain a lifestyle that can help our environment and society will make you more socially conscious/"social", not less.
Posted by Allyn on June 22, 2012 at 9:10 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 5
Ok, that's a vertical size I can live with...but a maximum one.

The ideal gridism for me is what us computer systems people call "loosely coupled".

For example, if I saved my solar energy as hydrogen and shipped it to a fueling pump for cars.

Socialists and Democrats don't want anyone off the grid.

That's why they hate fuel cells and hydrogen.

That's why they like batteries...as unworkable as they are.

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on June 22, 2012 at 9:13 AM
6
Oh good grief, Charlie Mudede.
Posted by olive oyl on June 22, 2012 at 9:19 AM
gloomy gus 7
Ah, Madison and 19th, so much for Time knowing where "downtown Seattle" may be.

As for your worries about alienation, bear in mind the Bullitt Foundation's sole activity is connecting funding and support to locals and faraways working to soften the effects of environmental degradation. Accordingly, whether it draws electricity from Ross Dam or not, dumps into our sewer or not, wherever they hang their hat is ipso facto a source of continuous deep engagement reaching out from our city. This has been my overblown hippy dippy moment of the month.
Posted by gloomy gus on June 22, 2012 at 9:21 AM
gloomy gus 8
Ha! 15th, more fool me!
Posted by gloomy gus on June 22, 2012 at 9:22 AM
Urgutha Forka 9
"...choosing MacBook Air laptops..."

(rolls eyes)

They can't just say "choose low power laptops over desktop computers." Nope. Gotta be "hip." Gotta be "cool." Gotta be an Apple commercial. Fuck Apple.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on June 22, 2012 at 9:30 AM
Charles Mudede 10
@9, amen!
Posted by Charles Mudede on June 22, 2012 at 9:32 AM
11
"Socialists and Democrats don't want anyone off the grid.

That's why they hate fuel cells and hydrogen."

Huh?
Posted by ryanmm on June 22, 2012 at 10:36 AM
Allyn 12
@11 he's an idiot; ignore him.
Posted by Allyn on June 22, 2012 at 10:46 AM
13 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy
14
Universal healthcare will never happen in our lifetimes. It won't. Forget about it. You might as well hope for an Anarchist Collective replacing capitalism, that or warp drive. It's a sweet fantasy.

The best we can hope for is a model like the Swiss model. A mandate model. Which is close to what Obama has.

The frigg'n EU is melting down and many of the EU nations are starting to scale back on their healthcare coverage because their systems are quickly becoming insolvent. Over the next tow decades you're going to see this repeated everywhere that has large socially funded healthcare systems. Probably even Canada.

And that is all mostly our fault - our un-regulated financial systems fault, that is. And the fault of our revolting consumer lifestyles that is quickly making the developing world obese and expensive to keep alive.

We fucked it up for everybody and it's gong to be many decades - after the baby boomers die off - before anybody is going to be able to afford to make a major institutional healthcare shifts like Universal Care.

I wish I was wrong. It'd be awesome to be wrong. But I'm not.
Posted by tkc on June 22, 2012 at 11:28 AM
15
Ooops. Totally wrong thread. Sorry you guys.
Posted by tkc on June 22, 2012 at 11:30 AM
16
I'd also argue that 'Off the grid" is misleading. They will still be attached to the various utility and social 'grids', they're just modifying how they use them.

To put it in another way, ARPANET was a completely government run network that our current web based Internet was built on top of. Libertarian geeks can talk all they want about "loosely coupled" relationships, but the technology they are still interwoven with, and take advantage of, is still a 'socialist' based technology network.
Posted by Large Hardon Colluder on June 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Max Solomon 17
it won't be off the electrical grid. it will be NET-zero energy. it feeds excess to the grid in the summer, and draws that surplus in the winter.

plus, $500/sf, probably. another toy for the rich, in this case the Bullitts.
Posted by Max Solomon on June 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM
gloomy gus 18
@17, you might read the NYT article from last year before deciding whether it's a "toy for the rich" or the incubator pilot project the nonprofit Bullitt Foundation (not the Bullitts personally) aimed for when they funded it. I'll go ahead and post the whole article in case you have paywall concerns:
The Self-Sufficient Office Building
By BRYN NELSON
Published: October 4, 2011
SEATTLE — One of the most highly anticipated development projects in the Pacific Northwest is still little more than a grid of concrete and rebar at the edge of the Capitol Hill neighborhood here. When completed near the end of next year, though, the six-story office building may be the greenest commercial structure in the world.

The building, the $30 million Bullitt Center at 1501 East Madison Street, is expected to set a new precedent for environmentally friendly design and construction and in doing so would reinforce Seattle’s reputation as a global leader in sustainable development.

As the future home of the environmentally focused Bullitt Foundation and other like-minded tenants, the Bullitt Center is designed to produce as much electricity as it uses, making it both energy- and carbon-neutral. The building will supply and treat all of its own water, capturing rainwater in a 50,000-gallon underground cistern. And its construction will exclude items on a “red list” of hazardous materials like lead and cadmium, a stipulation that has required developers to compile a spreadsheet of 362 prohibited building components.

If the Bullitt Center passes the self-sufficiency test after its first full year of occupancy, it will be certified as a “living building” by the International Living Future Institute, a group based in Seattle that has established a green building standard, called the Living Building Challenge, widely viewed as the world’s toughest.

“The story is that this building is pushing the boundaries of performance in all categories, not just in one or two,” said Jason McLennan, the chief executive of both the certifying institute and the Cascadia Green Building Council, a chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council that administers the better-known LEED rating system. “For this building type and this scale, it’s the first in the world to go this far.”

So far, only three modestly sized buildings have been fully certified as “living buildings,” a phrase Mr. McLennan coined in the ‘90s for structures that could operate “as elegantly and efficiently as flowers.” Joining the exclusive group means meeting expectations in seven areas, or “petals,” including water, energy, health, materials, site, equity and beauty; projects also may attain certification in individual petals.

Although the concept has not yet attained the popularity of movements like the primarily European Passivhaus, about 100 other “living building” projects are in development.

Denis Hayes, the president and chief executive of the Bullitt Foundation and a national coordinator of the first Earth Day in 1970, said his foundation’s future home had benefited from an integrated design process involving architects, engineers, developers and contractors.

Rising above an adjacent pocket park lined with gnarled sycamores, the building will be capped by a rooftop “sombrero” of photovoltaic panels expected to produce enough energy in the summer to overcome wintertime deficits and break even over an entire year.

The idea that solar energy alone could meet the needs of a multistory office building in overcast Seattle might strike some as wishful thinking.

But that will be accomplished through a combination of increased panel efficiency and a decrease in energy demands. The Bullitt Center is expected to use less than one-fourth the energy of a typical building its size; conventional usage would have dictated a 64,000-square-foot solar panel canopy that would have shrouded the block.

Even so, the solar panel array will extend out like a brim over the sidewalk, requiring a special permit from the city. Minimizing the building’s energy footprint has also required higher ceilings and windows to let in as much natural daylight as possible, tacking an additional nine feet to the building’s overall height and prompting an ultimately unsuccessful zoning challenge from a neighboring apartment building.

Meeting strict water usage rules could prove more onerous. As planned, the Bullitt Center will collect and treat rainwater for its showers, sinks and drinking fountains, then filter the used “gray water” through a lower-level green roof and a strip of landscaping. The building’s raw sewage will be composted and decontaminated before being shipped offsite to be converted into fertilizer.

The Washington State Department of Public Health requires urban public-use buildings that obtain their potable water from anything other than a municipal supply to chlorinate it. But chlorine would run afoul of the Living Building Challenge’s prohibitions on toxins, and the Bullitt Center’s backers are pushing instead for ozone purification, a less toxic method used elsewhere around the world.

Chris Rogers, of the building’s developer, Point32, said the project’s team was negotiating with state authorities over how to have the Bullitt Center’s water independently tested to prove that it would meet quality standards. Even if it does, the Bullitt Center will remain connected to the city’s water supply as a backup.

The project ran into another snag over financing. The Bullitt Foundation challenged a design firm, the Miller Hull Partnership, and their collaborators to develop a core of steel, concrete and timbers with a life expectancy of 250 years, a nearly unheard-of number in an industry that typically uses 40-year life spans in appraising the value of commercial buildings. With no comparable structures to point to, banks were at a loss for how to value many of the building’s central features, including its expected longevity and its energy and water self-sufficiency. Most balked at lending. Meanwhile, the upfront costs have run about one-third higher than for commercial structures of comparable size.

”Candidly, we had to put more equity into this building than we expected,” Mr. Hayes said. “We found only a very, very, very limited number of banks that would even consider making a loan, and the most generous of them gave us a construction permit for about 50 percent of the cost of constructing the building.”

Mr. McLennan said the difficulties in financing the project, however, could ease the strain on future efforts by providing a template for the added value of a living building. “How do you find comparables for a building that’s never been built like this before?” he asked. “You can’t.”

The project has won some important victories. Earlier in its development, it was a catalyst for the passage of a 2009 Seattle ordinance that set up a pilot program offering new flexibility in the city’s land use code for up to 12 potential “living buildings.”

After the developers selected highly energy-efficient windows from Schüco International, a German company, it agreed to set up its first American assembly plant, in the Puget Sound region. And Point32’s team persuaded Building Envelope Innovations, of Clackamas, Ore., to reformulate its Wet-Flash sealant, a liquid spray that creates watertight and airtight barriers, to exclude phthalates, compounds that mimic some human hormones and have been linked to disruptions in the endocrine system.

The Bullitt Center has early lease commitments for four of its six floors. The building’s general contractor, the Schuchart Corporation, will be a principal tenant, joining Mr. McLennan’s Cascadia Green Building Council in staking their reputations on the structure’s success. The foundation says rents will be comparable to those for other newly constructed, LEED-certified buildings in the area, and it eventually expects a positive return on investment.

Mr. Hayes said the project team was talking with behavioral economists on incentives to encourage tenants to practice environmentally responsible habits. Immediate feedback on energy use may be one. Competition among floors may be another, as well as making each tenant’s consumption public.

Designers also are not beyond a little bribery. At the site’s high point along East Madison Street, a glass-enclosed stairwell will connect the upper four floors. Those who choose to walk rather than take the elevator will be rewarded with spectacular views of the Space Needle and downtown skyline.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/05/reales…
More...
Posted by gloomy gus on June 22, 2012 at 2:17 PM
19
You have to flush BEFORE? They better put reallly big signs over the toilets reminding people about that, or nobody who's been desperately holding their pee while their meeting runs overtime is going to remember that as they run to the loo!
Posted by teamcanada on June 22, 2012 at 2:35 PM
20
Do realize that the investment to obtain this building's level of self sufficiency is probably greater than anything the average for-profit developer or individual renter or owner could afford to pay. I see that there is no mention of how long it will take to defray the cost of that additional investment through not having to purchase power and other services from the existing shared infrastructure. Given the building's unproven technology and the scale of its implementation, I wouldn't be surprised if the operating budget is higher, even after reducing or eliminating electrical, water and sewage costs. The benefits for the users of this building are likely not financial.

But also consider what this investment in grid replacing technology is doing as well: decreasing the pool of users for the existing infrastructure without, at the same time, reducing the costs of operating that infrastructure. Most people who can't afford to leave the grid will find themselves paying more for its services since grid cost is a function of the costs of the pipes and wires as well as the cost of the water and electricity that travel through them - but revenue is collected on a quantity consumed basis. Such systems are most cost effective when everyone uses them. Cost creep is occurring for electrical and water rate payers now as more efficient plumbing and appliances become popular.

Going it alone as this building is doing isn't in the common interest if that interest is measured in terms of the money people must pay in the present for their utility services. In terms of pioneering a new, efficient and environmentally beneficial common infrastructure though, it may set the stage for reduced costs in the future. This is extremely important but it certainly won't happen without a collective willingness to bear the price of transition. Does this project discuss that aspect of its social impact?
More...
Posted by Edward on June 22, 2012 at 2:44 PM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 21
I think it's an interesting experiment, and from interesting experiments often come good things for society.

But please note: This building will not be "off the grid". They are hoping it will be net zero in consumption - meaning that it will generate as much electricity via the solar array as it uses during evenings and times when the sun is not shining. and it is dependent on the grid. That is a big difference.

Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on June 22, 2012 at 3:11 PM
venomlash 22
@5: Top five reasons why hydrogen-powered vehicles will not pan out:
1. HYDROGEN IS NOT A FUEL SUPPLY
2. HIBRODEN IS NOP A FEUL SPPLUY
3. HARGOBLEM LD NIY E VULL ZUBLY
4. MIDROHEM SI WOB DA FEWL ESPLAY
5. GYDROHEM NIZ TON A FWELL PUSPLY
Posted by venomlash on June 22, 2012 at 3:17 PM
23
Since when is the Bullitt Center downtown? Is Capitol Hill now part of downtown?
Posted by Weekilter on June 22, 2012 at 6:22 PM
KingofQueenAnne 24
Im not sure I see this as just a toy for the rich. Someone's gotta build one of the first examples of ultra self-sufficient buildings somewhere, sometime. Otherwise better practices will always remain on the drawing board.

Remember when flat screen TVs were a ridiculously expensive indulgence for the rich or only used in a commercial context? Well, now they're in every living room.
Posted by KingofQueenAnne http://blingeejesus.blogspot.com on June 22, 2012 at 6:28 PM
Free Lunch 25
So it has an elevator, but not enough power to run it? Doesn't seem very ADA compliant.
Posted by Free Lunch on June 22, 2012 at 6:51 PM
gfish 26
Forget the fact that everyone in that building will be more connected through data channels than the ENTIRE PLANET was just decades ago. Their shit won't flow into a common pool with the rest of the city, so they're not being social.

You're a goddamned wanker, Mudede.
Posted by gfish http://www.attoparsec.com on June 22, 2012 at 7:31 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy