Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Amazon Is Not Going to Launch Waldenbooks for the 21st Century

Posted by on Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM

I'm getting forwarded this Forbes story left and right today. It's built on a rumor from February of this year that Amazon.com is planning a brick-and-mortar retail space. Please bear in mind that what follows is just wild speculation, and not based on any new information:

This is likely the birth of a major new retail bookstore chain, a Waldenbooks for the 21st Century. Sure, they’ll test and tweak at that first store. But get ready for the rollout...Someone at Amazon has awoken to the realization that the company is sitting on a gold mine of unique books and ebooks. Put that together with its own reader device, and you’ve got the setting for a cross between Barnes & Noble and the Apple store — in other words, a bookstore my 10-year-old son is going to want to visit. And buy things at, and read them, on his Kindle.

First up: I'm not sure anybody's clamoring for a Waldenbooks for the 21st century. Waldenbooks was an exceptionally late-20th-century kind of idea. And if Amazon is planning a retail store, it's sure as hell not going to be a traditional brick-and-mortar bookstore. They publish a lot of books now, but they don't publish nearly enough to stock their own traditional bookstore with anything resembling the comprehensiveness that people expect from Amazon. If there is an Amazon store in the works, it's probably going to be something more like a boutique Best Buy, a cross between a museum and a mail-order business, and I don't think it would be entirely book-centric.

Amazon isn't especially good at coming up with new ideas—the Kindle came about because Jeff Bezos got scared by the Sony Reader and hired a team to perfect the idea of the e-reader; the Kindle Fire doesn't bring anything new to the table other than "cheap iPad"—but they are especially good at stripping what they perceive to be bullshit out of an idea. I think the culture at Amazon believes that bookstores are mostly bullshit; this store has to be a lot more ambitious than that.

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Anyone remember when Old Navy used to just sell clothing & apparel? Then they gradually placed their accessory section closer to the checkout section - then they gradually replaced that section with useless made in china crap like water bottles and frisbees - and now the entire front of the checkout section is a swath of useless novelties and crap and junkfood that's unrelated to the theme of the store that one could essentially buy from any drug store?! I imagine that's what an Amazon "boutique" would look and feel like.
Posted by Wedgwood99 on June 20, 2012 at 3:14 PM
Reverse Polarity 2
Amazon has got to be aware that they are almost solely responsible for the death of mainstream retail bookstores nationwide (well, Amazon and the internet in general). They, of all people, know that the brick-and-mortar bookstore is a doomed business model. This rumor is completely senseless.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on June 20, 2012 at 3:44 PM
r.chops 3
@2:
I'd say Barnes & Noble is more responsible for that.
How soon we forget the 90s when they were the evil ones destroying book culture.
Posted by r.chops on June 20, 2012 at 4:08 PM
Dougsf 4
Sounds like a winning concept. Maybe the US Post should follow their lead and set up special areas at the post office where customers can come in with their laptops and send emails.
Posted by Dougsf on June 20, 2012 at 4:09 PM
5
I applaud it. I used to spend 2-3 hours a week in book stores browsing. While amazon's recommendation engine is very good; I like to browse books by spine and cover. Barnes and Noble's selection has become excessively bland. I mostly enjoy small, well though out independent book stores nowadays.

I can also see another great advantage: free shipping to your local store.
Posted by Hajo Smulders on June 20, 2012 at 4:21 PM
malcolmxy 6
Amazon is a massive co-op, that also includes an impressive worldwide distribution chain.

I would expect that their stores eventually resemble Walmart and that this is a first step in that direction.

THINK. Why would they be thinking so small? Has Amazon EVER been simply an online book seller?

Jesus...any more small minded and you'd be related to a goldfish.
Posted by malcolmxy on June 21, 2012 at 4:04 AM
7
@5 - If Barnes & Noble's selection has gotten too bland for you, don't blame it, blame yourself. You and countless others have used B&N as your showroom and then you went home and ordered the books you just spent "2-3 hours a week" fondling and leaving in a heap for B&N employees to pick up and re-shelve. You devalued the B&N books and wasted B&N employee time--which could have been better used helping paying customers. Oh, sure, maybe you bought one or two things at B&N, maybe a coffee or a cold drink that you spilled on B&N merchandise, further costing the company money. Oh, but you got your books cheaper at Amazon and you were happy.

Now, Barnes & Nobles can't afford to carry a larger selection that you only look at and never buy and than makes you unhappy. You are also probably one of those assholes that expects to be waited on extensively by B&N employees and now you are pissed off that staffing has been cut back due to lack of revenue BECAUSE YOU NEVER BUY ANYTHING THERE. Barnes & Noble is a business, not the public library, despite what most people think and how they treat the stores, their people and merchandise. If there isn't profit, then books and services get cut, duhhhhhhhhhh. So, remember that when you congratulate yourself on taking advantage of Barnes & Noble. When stores start closing you have no one to blame but yourself. Then, when there are only independent bookstores left, those will close too and you will be left with an Amazon monopoly and gee, then Brazos can charge you full price for your books.
Posted by Bugnroolet on June 21, 2012 at 7:20 AM
Claypatch 8
@7 : Yes, B&N is a business, just not a terribly interesting one. #5's comments were about how bland B&N's selection is and, unfortunately, its *always* been that way. #5 is right, small independent bookstores are much more interesting than B&N. And no, I dont shop at Amazon either, because Jeff Bezos can go eat a bag of dick.
Posted by Claypatch on June 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM
9
@3: Yep. B&N and Borders destroyed independent bookstores. Amazon mostly destroyed B&N and Borders, for the most part.
Posted by Amazon's existence threatens indies, of course on June 21, 2012 at 8:57 AM
r.chops 10
@7--
Wait... Poor Barnes & Noble?
Ugh.

Is this some case of the enemy-of-my-enemy?

I know the 90s are getting further and further away, but, I mean, people hated B&N for what they did to indie bookstores. They made a movie about it, with that Bosom Buddies guy and AOL or something.

I understand the dislike/hatred of Amazon, but I am having serious trouble with the rationale of 'poor Barnes & Noble.'

With Amazon taking out Borders, Waldenbooks, and maybe B&N some day, maybe there will actually be room enough again for indie bookstores to thrive.
Posted by r.chops on June 21, 2012 at 9:32 AM
11
@7 Looks like someone works for Amazon
Posted by britches on July 16, 2012 at 7:45 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy