Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, May 31, 2012

There Have Been 21 Gun-Related Homicides in Seattle This Year

Posted by on Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:00 AM

Yesterday, at around 3 p.m., Brendan reported that the number of gun-related homicides in Seattle this year was 20. It was—yesterday at around 3 p.m.

Now that another of Wednesday's shooting victims has died, it's 21 gun-related homicides for the year so far.

As Brendan already noted:

By this time last year, there had only been three.

However, for a city the size of Seattle, the current murder rate is still relatively low.

 

Comments (28) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
BLUE 1
Well, obviously something is so very very different this year. Or not. Waiting for the wild speculation. I say Poisson Process. People and crazy people are a little unpredictable. Populations of people and crazy people are a cinch.
Posted by BLUE on May 31, 2012 at 6:16 AM
2
Mental illness and firearms are not a good combo,, even in war. Please note the number of catastrophic incidents among active duty military personnel. Combat troops and others are suffering from abnormally high rates of mental illness. Maybe firearms CAUSE these aberations....

Perhaps the sight or feel of firearms triggers latent psychosis in some people.....Perhaps the possession of a weapons enhances delusions of grandeur and invincibility? Whatever, crazy people with guns create problems that sane people with guns cannot cure or prevent.
Posted by pupuguru on May 31, 2012 at 6:21 AM
Cato the Younger Younger 3
You take a mix of mental illness super easy access to a wide variety of firearms and add in economic desperation with little to no hope of improvement. Then you bake it in a society that celebrates war and violence while terrifying the population that everyone is out to get them (that last part comes from your evening news) and see what you get.

Yes, the killer is clearly responsible but don't forget for a second the role society has played in this nightmare.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on May 31, 2012 at 6:36 AM
4
Wow, way to present seemingly scary statistics with zero context or perspective. Good work Mr Pulizter.

We both know Seattle is an extremely safe city for its size.
Posted by Swearengen on May 31, 2012 at 6:40 AM
5
Chicago had 120 at the beginning of April and Illinois has the most restrictive handgun laws of any state. Chicago had eleven dead and 43 wounded just last weekend. Gun control is a fantasy when the guns are already present. Do you have a feasable plan to round up 100,000,000 handguns?
Posted by Tyrone Shoelaces on May 31, 2012 at 6:45 AM
6
Hay, swearengen, spoiling for a fight this early? The statistic that Eli presented is perfectly valid as a stand alone. It needs no context. Go back to bed, and try getting up on the other side.
Posted by laurax on May 31, 2012 at 6:47 AM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 9
It seems to me that the root of this particular tragedy is mental illness, and our inability to deal with it. We need involuntary commitment, long-term mental care facilities, and adequate funding to support them in a professional and humane manner.

As for the gang problems, drug legalization, as well as free and abundant access to birth control - including paying people to get vasectomies and tubal ligations - would work wonders.

But the conservatives would block any of these initiatives, preferring to use Jesus as an excuse for their cheapness.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on May 31, 2012 at 7:23 AM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 10
Oh, and thanks to the troll @8 for reminding me: "birth control" should include free abortions on demand to anyone who wants one, no questions asked,
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on May 31, 2012 at 7:24 AM
11
There's going to be no change in the way we deal with mental illness, there's going to be no change in our firearms laws, and there's nothing we can do about the general level of desperation that a down economy brings.
Posted by tiktok on May 31, 2012 at 7:30 AM
badstone 12
In Philly we've already had 150 murders, most of them gun-inflicted, and we only have 3 times your population. Consider yourselves lucky.
Posted by badstone on May 31, 2012 at 7:33 AM
jenniferjane 14
Has anyone else noticed that the majority of the suspects in these violent crimes (this year and in the past) have had multiple arrests and have never been treated or tried for their crimes? I have. Instead of focusing on guns maybe the mayor should focus on treating the suspects before letting them go and kill a bunch of innocent people. Every city has their issues- most cities crime is directly related to poverty, while Seattle's is directly related to not caring and shoving it under the rug.
Posted by jenniferjane http://morningbikeporn.blogspot.com/ on May 31, 2012 at 7:35 AM
bleedingheartlibertarian 16
The first 6 months of 2011 were exceptionally peaceful, even by the standards of Seattle. It's not really a meaningful baseline for comparison.
Posted by bleedingheartlibertarian on May 31, 2012 at 7:37 AM
jenniferjane 17
@12 I live in New Orleans and tusday someone shot up a ten year olds birthday party leaving 24 shells on the ground and 5 people dead, including a five year old girl. I don't consider ANYone lucky. All of it sucks.
Posted by jenniferjane http://morningbikeporn.blogspot.com/ on May 31, 2012 at 7:38 AM
pdonahue 19
Suicide rates double of any homicide statistic- where is the headlines? The press conferece by public safety comittee? The community meetings? Could it be that latching on to black and white wedge issues like gun ownership Just make better talking points for journalists and politicians?
Posted by pdonahue on May 31, 2012 at 7:39 AM
20
For all those comparing Seattle to other cities, I think that is kind of the point. Seattle is generally an exceptionally safe city (I used to live in Miami, which is the opposite in more ways than one...), so this type of uptick in gun violence really gets noticed here, and perhaps indicates that we should all be paying a little more attention when it happens in other cities. 21 homicides vs150 homicides does not matter, all are tragic unnecessary deaths.
Posted by lone locust on May 31, 2012 at 7:52 AM
rob! 21
Swearengen anagram: we nag, sneer.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on May 31, 2012 at 8:10 AM
WFM 22
I tend toward the position that law-abiding, mentally-sound gun owners are responsible for a miniscule fraction of gun violence. Yesterday's tragedy is exemplary of a persistent and intensely-frustrating problem: our inadequate ability to disarm mentally-ill people with violent tendencies. I found this on a NYT blog:

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07…

Q. What constitutes a mental illness that prevents a person from buying a gun? — Demo NYC, New York

A. Under federal law, anyone who has been formally committed to a mental health facility or adjudicated as a “mental defective” is disqualified from buying and possessing firearms.

The first prong is fairly self-explanatory, describing people who have been hospitalized by court order. The second is a little more complicated. It describes someone who has been designated by some legal authority — usually a court, but it also could be a board or commission — to be a danger to himself or others, or to lack the mental capacity to manage his or her own affairs. It also describes people found by a court to be incompetent to stand trial, or found in a criminal case to be insane.

In other words, the fact that a psychiatrist has given someone a diagnosis of mental illness does not, by itself, bar that person from having a gun. Some sort of legal adjudication is required.

That, in fact, is one reason Jared Loughner, the suspect in the Tucson shootings, was not prohibited from buying firearms, despite having some serious mental health issues.

Complicating matters a bit, some states have set their own slightly different mental health criteria for firearms prohibitions. For example, in California, anyone who has been placed on an involuntary psychiatric hold for 72 hours in which they have been deemed a threat to themselves or others is barred from having a gun for five years. Virginia bars people who have been the subject of a temporary detention order and who voluntarily agree to inpatient treatment.

Q. How does a gun dealer know that a person has been adjudicated “mentally defective”? In other words, do the federal and state laws that prohibit mental defectives from purchasing firearms actually prevent mental defectives from purchasing firearms? — Rupert, Alabama

A. This is the whole point of the F.B.I.’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS, which contains information on prohibited firearms purchasers. In some states, firearms dealers contact the NICS call center directly; in others, the checks are handled by state agencies. The problem is a lot of states still do not share their mental health adjudications with the NICS. The reasons include privacy issues, technological challenges and just inattention from state officials. That was what the NICS Improvement Amendments Act, passed after the Virginia Tech shootings, was meant to address, giving money to states to improve its sharing of records, including mental health ones. Since the passage of the act, record sharing has improved, but there are still serious gaps. Even with states that are now sharing their mental health records with the NICS, they might not have uploaded older records of people who have been committed or adjudicated as mentally ill or incapacitated.
More...
Posted by WFM on May 31, 2012 at 8:30 AM
23
Folks, pay attention to #14. The lack of law and judicial enforcement is a much bigger problem than the gun laws. What good are new laws if we don't even enforce the current ones?
Posted by Gomez http://misterstevengomez.com on May 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM
reverend dr dj riz 24
@4.. well that got old fast.. eli's pulitzer i mean. so now EVERYthing he writes is supposed to measure up to that achievement and when it doesn't we can trot out that sneer.. except..
in this particular case i think it relevant to remind you that the prize was awarded as a result of his reportage on a senseless violent crime that was in a large part a result of of the same factors that seem to have been in play here. different particulars , of course, but similar in significant ways, and with deadlier results. you want immediate context and perspective ? reread that piece.
Posted by reverend dr dj riz on May 31, 2012 at 8:48 AM
Cascadian 25
It's the guns and the mental illness, in combination. We need to address both. An undiagnosed mentally ill person can too easily get a gun, as can anyone who falls through the cracks. Rigorous gun licensing that requires a Psych eval before carrying a gun in a city would prevent most mass shootings. We also need to spend more on mental illness and have socialized medicine. Republicans oppose all of this, unfortunately.
Posted by Cascadian on May 31, 2012 at 8:55 AM
26
Crazy people with guns create problems that sane people with guns cannot cure or prevent.
Posted by pupuguru on May 31, 2012 at 8:58 AM
Kinison 27
McGinn, you're doing a heck of a job.

At this point, Diaz doesnt need to be demoted, he needs to be fired.
Posted by Kinison http://www.holgatehawks.com on May 31, 2012 at 9:01 AM
28
Since it is completely insane to deny that a) swamping the nation with instruments made for killing and b) leaving mentally ill people on the street without psychiatric care both correlate with levels of senseless violence in our communities, I humbly suggest that we get Republicans and their allies committed to mental institutions. I already hear your objections that it'd be extremely difficult to act on my insight but wouldn't it be more difficult to convince conservatives they have lost the plot. Think about it.
Posted by anon1256 on May 31, 2012 at 9:27 AM
29
Even with the uptick in the homicide rate so far this year, and even if that higher rate continues through the rest of the year (though there's no clear reason to expect that it will), we'll still end up well below the average homicide rate in the 80s and 90s (especially the early 90s, when it reached an all-time high).

Seattle is still a very safe place to live, statistically.
Posted by Zeusifer on May 31, 2012 at 9:54 AM
Keister Button 30
Is gang-afflicted Seattle's murder rate per capita lower than gang-afflicted Vancouver BC's murder rate per capita?
Posted by Keister Button on May 31, 2012 at 10:18 AM
Will in Seattle 31
@30 six people died in White on White gun deaths and you want to talk about gang murders?

Seriously?

Are you kidding me?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 31, 2012 at 11:06 AM
Will in Seattle 32
@27 for the win.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 31, 2012 at 11:06 AM
jenniferjane 33
Thanks Gomez- it's true though. Focus on providing a solution to the ROOT of the problem first, not the tools involved. The more you make something illegal the more dangerous it'll become. The more help and love and care you provide to someone in need the less dangerous they'll become. Easier said than done, but it's the only way to solve this issue.
Posted by jenniferjane http://morningbikeporn.blogspot.com/ on May 31, 2012 at 8:36 PM

Add a comment

In an effort to keep the discourse respectful and on topic, commenting on this item is now available only to registered commenters.
Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy