Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, May 21, 2012

Even More on the Spectrum/Storefronts Thing

Posted by on Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:49 PM

How did a piece of public dance-art become such a big goddamned deal? It went a little something like this.

I just got off the phone with Susie Purves, the executive director of Spectrum, who says she's had to talk the city of Seattle down about people at Survival Research Labs covering the viaduct with fire, but is deeply surprised at the way this Spectrum/Storefronts thing has gone down, saying Spectrum did its due diligence with Storefronts and the local development organizations and The Miraculous Mandarin was exactly what Spectrum said it would be. (Don't you wish you'd stood in the rain with me to see it the other night? Probably 50 people saw it, and probably eight times that many people are now talking about it.)

Van Diep of Spectrum sent an email clarifying the dance company's position. Shorter version: Spectrum says it did everything it was supposed to do, informed all the people they were supposed to inform, and they don't understand why people are flipping out. The full press release is below the jump.

Corollary: Purves told me a Spectrum staff member was dedicated, during the show, to finding people with children and let them know what was going on so they could take their kids elsewhere if they wanted to. She also said that Mandarin had consumed around one quarter of Spectrum's resources for this year, that they had expected to make no real money from it (free performance, funded by grants, and all that), and are sorely disappointed that they went to all that trouble and expense only to get shut down after the first performance.

And so you don't get the wrong idea: The show involved some sexual grinding (which is what people are exercised about) and a suffocation-murder (which, oddly enough, people aren't exercised about). There was implied nudity but no actual nudity that I could see. And the press release, for your edification and entertainment:

* * *

Spectrum response to Storefronts Seattle official statement on cancellation of Miraculous Mandarin


Spectrum Dance Theater must respond to some inaccuracies in Storefront Seattle’s official statement, posted on its website, about the cancellation of The Miraculous Mandarin performances at Hing Hay Park.

From Storefronts' statement: “And so we asked Spectrum’s leadership specifically about nudity and simulated sex acts, and warned them generally that the rules of the Storefronts Seattle program mandated that presentations be appropriate for a general audience. They assured us that the show would be within the bounds of appropriateness.”

Spectrum Response: Spectrum Dance Theater warned Storefronts Seattle and its stakeholders in the neighborhood that the content was not appropriate for children 13 and under. In fact, this is stated explicitly by the landlord of the Bush Hotel in an editorial published in the International Examiner newspaper, another community stakeholder in the neighborhood.

Storefronts Seattle is managed by Matthew Richter. Mr. Richter was a member of Spectrum’s 2011-2012 season design team as Scenic Designer from September 2011 until April 2012. The concept of presenting the Miraculous Mandarin in a space that evoked a voyeuristic audience experience was conceived before Mr. Richter became Scenic Designer. In fall 2011, he was briefed on all upcoming season performances. In November 2011, he received a DVD of the 2006 version of Miraculous Mandarin performed at the Moore Theater. He was told that the choreography would not change.

In his position as Storefronts program manager, Mr. Richter facilitated the reservation of the Bush Hotel’s old Hanil Garden Restaurant space overlooking Hing Hay Park in March. He has not heeded the material previously provided.

In the months leading up to the performances of Miraculous Mandarin, Spectrum Dance Theater reached out to many important neighborhood stakeholders in the Chinatown-International District — the Public Development Authority (PDA), the Business Improvement Association, the International Examiner, and the Wing Luke Asian Museum, among others. Spectrum reached out to experts who could speak to issues about the neighborhood and performance in public spaces for our post-performance talkbacks. Spectrum and the Wing Luke Museum, arguably the most public institution in the neighborhood, planned co-programming to explore the history of marginalized people in the neighborhood.

Every step of the way, all partners were cautioned about the content of the performance.

The opening night performance took place at 8:40 pm on a Thursday evening in front of an audience of 30-40 people sitting and standing in the rain. Among this audience were staff from the Wing Luke Museum, the director and deputy director of the PDA, prominent members of the arts community, theater critics, local residents, drug dealers, prostitutes, and homeless people. Most passerbys stopped for a few minutes and moved on. The show unfolded over 45 minutes, and afterwards 20 people sat in IDEA Space, a public gallery run by the PDA, for a half-hour to share their response to the Miraculous Mandarin.

At 9:21pm, before the opening night performance concluded, Spectrum staff received an expletive filled email from Mr. Richter that demanded that we vacate the building the next day. The tone can conservatively be described as inflammatory, and accused Spectrum of intentionally misleading and blindsiding him of the content of the performances. This is untrue.

Mr. Richter made the decision to evict Spectrum without any offer to discuss modifications that could be made to keep the presentation in the Bush Hotel.

Spectrum Dance Theater has in good faith informed all parties with a vested interest of the nature of the Miraculous Mandarin. We felt that the setting at Hing Hay Park specifically created an artistic synergy that was appropriate to the content and the type of audience likely to encounter the work. We were explicit about this with the community stakeholders. Spectrum Dance Theater rehearsed in the Bush Hotel for one week leading up to the opening, and performed run-throughs of the entire show that could be viewed at Hing Hay Park for two days before opening.

Spectrum Dance Theater, a nonprofit organization, has lost thousands of dollars on months of envisioning, designing, rehearsing, and community building on this production.

Storefronts Seattle is an important resource and advocate for artists, and has to date achieved its goal of enlivening vacant commercial space with programs and exhibitions.

Spectrum was very appreciative of Storefronts’ support for our presentation of Miraculous Mandarin. We are surprised, saddened anddisappointed at their actions. But we cannot allow Spectrum’s reputation to be tarnished by inaccurate information.

 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
bedipped 1
Who could've predicted such drama?

European Music in the Twentieth Century
Howard Hartog - 1957 - Page 29
Questions of 'morality' have interfered in the past with the performance of Bartok's one-act pantomime, The Miraculous Mandarin (19 19). On more than one occasion the censors have balked at the fantastic story.

I wish I had seen it.
Posted by bedipped on May 21, 2012 at 8:35 PM
2
That SRL show was something I'll never forget, ever. The railgun shooting plasma at the viaduct where the cops were standing...
Posted by ejamadoodle on May 21, 2012 at 9:00 PM
3
Maybe watch a run-through, Matt?
Posted by Chili on May 21, 2012 at 9:04 PM
Fnarf 4
It's a spectacular piece of music; how were the people in the park supposed to hear it?
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on May 21, 2012 at 9:25 PM
5
@3

While it was Richter's job to review the performance, and there's no excusing a lax vetting process, on a personal level I don't think I could fault a typical human being for maybe not giving full and undivided attention to 45 minutes of modern dance on DVD.

Or for maybe not carefully considering, all the way through, how the context of a public park might give rise to a different response in the observer than the context of a proscenium arch in a darkened theater.

Also: What percentage of families with kids do you figure are reading the notices of upcoming public park modern dance events in your community newspaper?

I'm about 99.all percent sure that this thing was cancelled not because someone was misleading about the nature of the piece, nor because someone else wasn't paying attention to warnings from the producers, but rather because an ordinary community resident or two witnessed the thing without having heard a blessed thing about it beforehand, and then put a humongous bug in the ear of the first community leader within reach.
Posted by robotslave on May 22, 2012 at 12:18 AM
6
In the end, this is just a costly pissing match, pitting Spectrum's financial and programmatic losses against Storefront's financial and reputational losses, because no one's going to accept any responsibility, admit failure and, in public, talk about what went wrong so that it doesn't happen again.

At this point it doesn't matter who falls on their sword, I'd just like to see some dialogue instead of a bunch of finger-pointing.
Posted by jtay on May 22, 2012 at 7:31 AM
7
Oh Seattle.
Posted by tacomagirl on May 22, 2012 at 8:06 AM
8
@ 4. They rigged up some speakers (and figured out some permission to amplify in the park, which I think is normally prohibited).
Posted by Brendan Kiley on May 22, 2012 at 8:44 AM
9
It would seem that “appropriate” has become an ambiguous word and to Spectrum in means dry humping is OK and to Storefronts it means it’s not.
Seems that anyone who takes their children to a modern dance performance after 8pm would run the risk of exposing their child to nudity and overt sexuality.
Posted by olive oyl on May 22, 2012 at 9:00 AM
10
What @7 said.
Posted by jt on May 22, 2012 at 9:03 AM
COMTE 11
@9:

I don't believe the issue has anything to do with the response of people who knew about the piece and actively sought it out, as presumably they would already have seen information regarding the sexual content and been given an opportunity to make an informed decision regarding its appropriateness.

Where all this seems to break down is with regards to the response (or potential response) of people who may have encountered the piece inadvertently, while in the act of simply passing through the neighborhood, and having had no prior advisement at to the content. Spectrum seems to believe these concerns were addressed; Storefronts, apparently does not.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on May 22, 2012 at 9:15 AM
12
So fully clothed fake sex is the worst thing ever but a fake murder is nothing. Wow. Also, get the stick out of your ass Seattle
Posted by yumyum74 on May 22, 2012 at 9:32 AM
13
First, sex is the root of dance, which is why it is so often censored and proscribed, most notably (recently) in places like revolutionary Iran and the Taliban's Afghanistan (but let’s not forget "Footloose"). Second, one of the major roles of art is to provoke ("Art is not a mirror to reflect reality; it is a hammer to shape it" [or something like that] -- somebody or other). Third, the role of the impresario is to know, understand, and defend the artist’s vision, not pander and cave (immediately!) to the lowest common sensibility; otherwise you’re a hack, a ticket-taker, a fucking popcorn salesman. Finally, I didn't see it, but it doesn’t sound like there is anything in Miraculous Mandarin that people couldn’t expose themselves to by watching TV commercials.

If Richter doesn't understand any of this, he has no business in public art (he likely does understand it but probably still has no place in public art). What an asshole.
Posted by letmegetthisstraight on May 22, 2012 at 10:35 AM
Will in Seattle 14
I was most concerned by how it affected my Service Orca.

Those naval tests mean that he still has flashbacks, and he ended up eating about 20 small puppies as a result.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 22, 2012 at 11:45 AM
15
A correction to Spectrum’s statement: The piece in the International Examiner previewing the Miraculous Mandarin performance and showcasing the work of Storefronts Seattle is written by a SCIDPDA staff member, and does not represent the agency.

An addendum to the statement: Spectrum’s goal in issuing the statement was to respond to the implication that we were not honest to Storefronts in our partnership. The personal attacks on Matt Richter are not productive and not called for. Whatever mistake was made does not mean that the public or the arts community should demonize Mr. Richter or the Storefronts Program. They have both done extraordinary things for local artists and the business districts that need revitalization, and should continue to do so. Spectrum’s ultimate goal is to secure a venue for The Miraculous Mandarin that stays true to the original vision for the audience to have a voyeuristic experience from a public space.
Posted by sdt on May 22, 2012 at 1:01 PM
16
Someone of influence probably got mad at Richter during the 11th hour and out of fealty he did the spineless thing: He built up a head of steam, passed the buck and changed/forgot whatever details he needed to in order to make it seem like Spectrum, not he, were the bad guys.
Posted by Gomez http://misterstevengomez.com on May 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy