Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, May 18, 2012

Burner Files First in 1st, Twice

Posted by on Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM

Defying an effort by the state party to dissuade the field of 1st Congressional District Democratic candidates from also filing in the special election to serve out the remaining weeks of Jay Inslee's term in the pre-redistricting 1st CD, Darcy Burner officially filed in both races this morning, on the final day of candidate filing week. I'm guessing Washington Dems chair Dwight Pelz probably isn't too pleased.

On a conference call last week arranged by Pelz, the other Democratic candidates—Laura Ruderman, Suzan DelBene, Steve Hobbs, and Darshan Rauniyar—had all agreed to stay out of the special election if the rest of the field would, but Burner balked, largely due to concerns that it would leave the Democratic nominee at a financial disadvantage in the general should the lone Republican John Koster run in the special, enabling him to essentially double the cap on campaign contributions. Campaign insiders disagree on the dollars at stake, but it's likely somewhere in the $200K to $500K range.

Now that Burner has filed in both races, the rest of the field is likely to follow suit. And what that means is ultimately hard to say.

Both races will appear on the ballot in those precincts that overlap the old and the new 1st CD, confusing enough regardless of who is running. Some election observers fear that this could lead to the doubly-confusing scenario of a different Democrat appearing on the general election ballot in each. Maybe. But I'm not the only one who thinks that the primary election will likely swing hard in one candidate's direction (much like the crowded King County executive primary race ultimately swung to Dow Constantine), sweeping one candidate to victory in both races. We'll see.

In any case, prepare for the recriminations to begin. No doubt Burner will be accused of not being a team player. But tired of party politics, who's to say that may not be exactly what voters are looking for in a candidate?

UPDATE: As expected, DelBene has announced she is filing in the special, and Pelz has issued a statement saying he is "very disappointed" with Burner for "breaking ranks." C'est la vie.

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
This is such a stupid waste of time and money and seriously annoying to the voters in the first district.

Also, please go away Darcy Burner.
Posted by PA Native on May 18, 2012 at 11:57 AM
Geocrackr 2
You mean Darcy isn't going to be a "team player" when her "team" is actively trying to screw her over in favor of the establishment DINO? Quelle surprise!
Posted by Geocrackr on May 18, 2012 at 12:18 PM
Goldy 3
@2: And if elected, she's unlikely going to be a "team player" when other Democrats cave on Social Security and Medicare.
Posted by Goldy on May 18, 2012 at 12:45 PM
4
Great, this two for one deal allows Darcy to lose yet another congressional race. Kind of like a two for one deal. Agree with @1, she needs to go away. If she couldn't win Reichert's district in 06 or 08, arguably the two beat cycles for dems in 40 years, she isn't going to do it this year or in that district. In a lot of ways, close loss in 10 was more impressive given what a shit year that was for dems.
Posted by PoliGeek on May 18, 2012 at 12:58 PM
5
Boy, really mangled that comment. Take out the double "twofer" reference and insert "DelBene's loss in 10..."
Posted by PoliGeek on May 18, 2012 at 1:08 PM
gloomy gus 6
Ms. Kucinich, party of one?
Posted by gloomy gus on May 18, 2012 at 1:18 PM
Daddy Love 7
Democracy, bitches!
Posted by Daddy Love on May 18, 2012 at 2:25 PM
8
And if elected, she's unlikely going to be a "team player" when other Democrats cave on Social Security and Medicare.


And how do you know that when she's never served in politics? She may not cave, but she may be as ineffectual in Congress as Jim McDermott.

As much as we don't need DINOs in office from a liberal district, we don't need more Democrats in office who never push through their own legislation.
Posted by keshmeshi on May 18, 2012 at 2:39 PM
9
@8, As long as we don't select progressive Democrats to run for office there won't be enough of them in congress to push through progressive legislation (Doh!).

If sell outs in congress are a major problem, should you select candidates more likely or less likely to sell out?
Posted by anon1256 on May 18, 2012 at 3:31 PM
10
@9,

I want candidates who can actually get things done. Even if that means pushing through not great, but better-than-the-alternative legislation like Health Care Reform.

But the point is pretty moot anyway, since I regard Darcy Burner as a milquetoast corporate type in the vein of Joe Mallahan, except perhaps slightly more liberal.
Posted by keshmeshi on May 18, 2012 at 3:47 PM
11
@10, It's interesting that your example be Health Care Reform since all progressive Democrats voted for it, which isn't mutually exclusive with having progressive Democrats arguing for putting single payer on the table (in agreement with the majority of the population).

As for Burner being a corporatist in sheep clothes, that would be quite a stunt considering her progression.
Posted by anon1256 on May 18, 2012 at 4:00 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy