Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Nick Hanauer's TED Talk Now on YouTube

Posted by on Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:02 PM

The kerfuffle—over TED allegedly banning Nick Hanauer's talk on income inequality because it was too political—didn't take long to resolve:

TED head Chris Anderson says, more or less, that the talk wasn't banned—it just wasn't good enough to be chosen—and accuses Hanauer off blowing up the controversy. Here's Anderson on his blog:

Here's what actually happened.

At TED this year, an attendee pitched a 3-minute audience talk on inequality. The talk tapped into a really important and timely issue. But it framed the issue in a way that was explicitly partisan. And it included a number of arguments that were unconvincing, even to those of us who supported his overall stance. The audience at TED who heard it live (and who are often accused of being overly enthusiastic about left-leaning ideas) gave it, on average, mediocre ratings. [...]

We discussed internally and ultimately told the speaker we did not plan to post. He did not react well. He had hired a PR firm to promote the talk to MoveOn and others, and the PR firm warned us that unless we posted he would go to the press and accuse us of censoring him. We again declined and this time I wrote him and tried gently to explain in detail why I thought his talk was flawed.

Anderson also explains that he's posted the talk on YouTube (as you see above), but it's not on the TED website. It's a he-said-she-said for right now. Hard to say who is right, but it seems there's some doubt about Anderson's claim that the talk was received as mediocre. "The audience gave the talk a standing ovation; stop bullshitting," says one of the commenters on Anderson's blog. At the end of the video you can see folks stand up... and Hanauer says, "I got a sensational reaction to the talk at the conference itself, including a big standing ovation." Make of it what you will.

 

Comments (32) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Fnarf 1
Um, I think you have some editing left to do on those last two paragraphs....
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on May 17, 2012 at 2:04 PM
pfffter 2
Anderson is releasing the video, not posting it on the TED site.
Posted by pfffter on May 17, 2012 at 2:04 PM
pfffter 3
It is also worth noting that Anderson's claim that the talk was not well-received by the audience is being rebutted by many in attendance that say Hanauer received a standing ovation. Hmmmm ...
Posted by pfffter on May 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM
Dominic Holden 4
1) Done. 2) Noted in the post. Thank you both.

Posted by Dominic Holden on May 17, 2012 at 2:15 PM
5
@4 I think it's just a good old fashioned pissing match, to be honest.
Posted by shaneleopard on May 17, 2012 at 2:23 PM
gloomy gus 6
Thanks for this, I'll watch it later. The text is already up, and unless he does cartwheels it does seem a bit less groundbreaking than the hype might suggest. As for the ovation, remember TED audiences tend to be like Seattle audiences - we'll give a standing O to a ham sandwich, but give us anonymous comment cards too and our claws come right out.
Text: http://roundtable.nationaljournal.com/20…
Posted by gloomy gus on May 17, 2012 at 2:26 PM
7
I just read the text of the talk. I'd give that a standing ovation.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on May 17, 2012 at 2:32 PM
8
The truth is conservatives don't care about creating jobs anymore than they care about protecting unborn babies. What they really want to do is to preserve the established social hierarchy. Hence, they favor public policy that gives men power over women, rich people power over not so rich people, and whites power over non-whites.
Posted by Ken Mehlman on May 17, 2012 at 2:33 PM
Urgutha Forka 9
@8
Pick up that can, citizen!
Posted by Urgutha Forka on May 17, 2012 at 2:43 PM
r.chops 10
Interesting take on it from Digby:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/a…

You can say it at TED (and it has been said before), but just don't be mean to the poor Job Creators!
Posted by r.chops on May 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM
schmacky 11
Is Anderson claiming that the audience in attendance gave it mediocre reviews? Or some batch of internal people/superusers who were shown the video, but weren't actually in attendance, did that?
Posted by schmacky on May 17, 2012 at 2:59 PM
12
It looks like part of the audience stood, but closer to 50% from that camera angle. Thought he was a bit inflammatory instead of letting the facts carry his argument. Hard to win over people when your peeing in their face.
Posted by Large Hardon Colluder on May 17, 2012 at 2:59 PM
BLUE 13
What's the point of TED? Ideas worth spreading? OK. New ideas worth spreading? Fail.
Posted by BLUE on May 17, 2012 at 3:12 PM
gloomy gus 14
@12, "letting the facts carry his argument" is one of my favorite things about a good talk, TED or no. It's not that it's a bad talk at all, and it's certainly not that the concepts aren't sound enough, it's that it doesn't hit that factual-discovery sweet spot, at least for me. As others noted, Hanauer does give this talk a lot, published a version of it here some time ago no less, so maybe he'll use this as inspiration to refresh it a bit.
Posted by gloomy gus on May 17, 2012 at 3:29 PM
Pope Urbane 15
I once gave a power point presentation where folks got up afterwards to leave. I'm now going to refer to that as my "standing ovation".
Posted by Pope Urbane on May 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM
16
Ah the shifting rationale. Always a sign of total honesty. Anderson's currently stated reason for not posting the talk, "it wasn't good enough" sorta flies in the face of his first email assertion that he was eager to put it on the site, then his assertions that he wasn't posting it because it was too political.

Also, most TED talks are self-aggrandizing BS. The only difference with this one is relevance.
Posted by pjmad on May 17, 2012 at 3:36 PM
17
Is the test of a good TED talk whether it gets a standing ovation or not? If that's the case, anyone could get up there and bitch about telemarketers or airport security lines and get a standing O. There is probably some other criteria that is more intellectually rigorous. At least one would hope.
Posted by Popular Sentiment on May 17, 2012 at 3:45 PM
18
@14 Agreed. Would have been that much harder for them not to post, instead of giving them half a reason not to.

@15 Applause when they are happy to see most power point presentations end, count as well.
Posted by Large Hardon Colluder on May 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM
19
Republicans are just crybabies and throw a hissy fit when someone points out that they aren't sharing, or playing nice, making sense, etc.

Sometimes they'll pick up a gun and go on a killing spree...

His logic is undoubtedly axiomatic and I haven't once heard ONE rebuttal. All I hear is "OMG, HE TOTALLY JUST SAID THAT TO OUR FACES, NO SUGAR"

People aren't used to facts, in fact, they are averse to them, usually. Lest they become knowledgeable and thus skeptics of nonsense.
Posted by lblehg!l on May 17, 2012 at 4:06 PM
Graham 20
I JUST READ THE TEXT OF THE TALK, AND IT WASN'T THAT INTERESTING.
Posted by Graham on May 17, 2012 at 4:36 PM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 21
@20 That says more about you than anything else.
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on May 17, 2012 at 7:28 PM
Westlake, son! 22
I have attempted to thumbs up the good responses on Youtube.
Posted by Westlake, son! on May 17, 2012 at 9:06 PM
23
Uh.....I read all of these slog comments
Posted by Foonken2 http://www.whatnonotnow.tumblr.com on May 17, 2012 at 10:23 PM
Keekee 24
So, canna anybody figure out the real reason why the video wasn't posted?
Posted by Keekee on May 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM
25
Demand creates jobs. Didn't Keynes come up with that one first? Still, good talk. It's kind of scary that Rush Limbaugh shouting about job creators can drown out the reasoning of the greatest economist of the last century, one whose work is still the basis of every introductory macroeconomics course in the country. Maybe Hanauer can get us steered back in the right direction.

Say it again: "demand creates jobs".
Posted by Can We All be Keynesians Again? on May 17, 2012 at 11:13 PM
Matt the Engineer 26
For those that haven't read Robert Reich's book Aftershock, it's this times a hundred and rich on facts. Great topic, but the presentation was a bit weak. That doesn't mean TED isn't screwing him.
Posted by Matt the Engineer on May 17, 2012 at 11:54 PM
27
Partisian is what we experience everyday in the main stream media. It is strange that the minute we start looking at things from the view point of "what would be best for everybody" one is accused of being partisian or too political or communist. This is a cultural problem that we need to get over if we are to survivie as a species.

I think it was Noam Chomsky who said that when you bring up ideas that are outside of the standard belief system it requires a lot more proof and justification. I thank Nick for taking a shot at it. May we all continue to do so.
http://igg.me/p/105519?a=496207

Posted by Kore22 on May 18, 2012 at 6:08 AM
28
@15: I saw people standing and applauding, not standing and leaving.
@18: I heard applause a few times during the talk, not just at the end.

I didn't think this was so "radical"; pretty much common sense.
Posted by Gregwashere on May 19, 2012 at 4:17 AM
29
" wasn't interesting" translates to not entertaining. I guess if I were an individual raised in an environment of hyper-entertainment, I might find this simple, yet informative talk "not interesting".
"Interesting" does not address the assertions made, nor the facts. It seems some folks cannot understand basic reality unless it is wrapped in a big, 3D surround-sound holographic, multi-media bow. But then it ain't so real then, is it?

Posted by Al B Tross on May 19, 2012 at 8:45 AM
30
What's important is relevance, not novelty. It's boring if you've heard it, but he/we wouldn't have to keep saying it it if weren't so damn true and if we would ACT on it and change things. Instead we putz around looking for novel stuff on TED.
Posted by Timbabwe1 on May 19, 2012 at 2:12 PM
31
We are running a petition calling for TED to post Nick Hanauer's speech on their website. If we get enough signatures TED will have a really difficult time to ignore the will of the web communities call for publishing.

You can contribute via:
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/post….

Lets get TED to post the talk, it has a right to be officially recognised!
Posted by ucasiii on June 19, 2012 at 8:14 AM
32
My Name is Sandra John , I wish to share my testimonies with the`general public about what this man called Dr Cafai, has just done for me , this man has just brought back my lost family to me, i was married to this man called Tony we were together for 4yrs and we loved our self’s but when i was unable to give him a child, he left me and told me he can’t continue anymore. Ever since then I`av been looking for ways to get him back until a friend of mine told me about this man and gave his contact email { cafaispiritualtemple@gmail.com) then you wont believe this when i contacted this man and tell him my problems he prepared this spell and bring my lost husband back and after a month i miss my menses and go for a test and the result stated am pregnant am happy today because am a mother of a baby girl, thank you once again the great DR cafai for what you have done for me, if you are out there passing through this same kind of problems you can contact him today on his mail (cafaispiritualtemple@gmail.com ) and he will also help you as well with his great spell,
Posted by Cynthia3 on May 20, 2013 at 8:17 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy