Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Sage Study Claims Light Rail is Pushing Minorities Out of Rainier Valley

Posted by on Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:49 PM

This post has been updated.

The addition of light rail is driving up rents and hastening gentrification in one of Puget Sound's most racially diverse neighborhoods—Rainier Valley—and without aggressive new jobs and housing policies that favor working class families, the fabric of the neighborhood will be destroyed, argues a report released yesterday by Puget Sound Sage (formerly known as the Seattle Alliance for Good Jobs and Housing for Everyone, or SAGE).

"Since construction of the light rail land values around the stations have increased dramatically," says the Sage report. Already, minority populations are dwindling, the report continues, and "The presence of light rail stations in Rainier Valley is likely to cause more gentrification."

While the minority population grew by 47 percent over the last decade in King County (and the white population shrank by two percent), in Rainier Valley, the trend is reversed: Communities of color only increased by 5 percent over that same period—and the white population increased by 17 percent.

The study notes that 23 percent of low-income Rainier Valley residents depend on public transit to get to work (versus only 14 percent of their more affluent neighbors)—and thus would benefit the most from transit-oriented development.

"The report highlights, and we hear it over and over again, that the success of light rail threatens to destroy what we find beautiful in the neighborhood," explains Seattle City Council member Mike O'Brien, a staunch advocate for more light rail who expressed concern not only for low-income residents but for local businesses in the area. "The mix of cultural businesses is critical and they might not exist if real estate triples in the next few years. We're pretty good about housing in the city, but when it comes to affordable retail space, it's definitely a new field for us."

City officials have already recognized the importance of preserving south Seattle neighborhoods—most recently around the Othello light rail station, with a newly-launched city initiative that seeks to stabilize small businesses in the area and build a multicultural center for residents (here's a .pdf of the initiative). But Sage's new report, "Transit Oriented Development that’s Healthy, Green and Just," suggests it's not enough:

"Existing efforts are likely to fall short of stemming the tide of displacement or realizing a vision that puts racial justice at the center of Transit Oriented Development (TOD) planning," the study states. The goal of transit-oriented development is, of course, to encourage the growth of dense, walkable communities with healthy public transit options to reduce our reliance on cars.

Although it's short on details, the 50-page study lists 16 recommendations for curbing displacement along southeast Seattle's light rail corridor, including:

· Create "local, high quality jobs in TOD projects in Rainier Valley—including both short-term construction jobs and long-term, on-site jobs."

· Along those lines, the report also recommends pushing for higher wages at service-sector jobs along the light rail corridor—like at SeaTac airport, where current wages rival those of McDonald's employees.

· Ensure affordable childcare near light rail stations for working parents.

· Support "community-controlled development" to help "stabilize Rainier Valley residents"—in other words, promote nonprofit development projects, like El Centro de la Raza's mixed-use affordable housing and performance center space, in lieu of for-profit development projects.

· Turn surplus Sound Transit property into affordable housing and affordable commercial development projects through "joint development projects."

· Include communities of color in TOD decision-making, not just stakeholder meetings to achieve racial equity outcomes.

But the report neglects to explain how many of the recommendations could, or should, be implemented. What role does the city have in dictating working wages, for example?

"One of the tricks is figuring out how to do that," O'Brien says. Over the coming months, O'Brien is organizing meetings with his fellow council members and Sage representatives to figure out how the recommendations can be absorbed by various city entities and projects.

 

Comments (42) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Hernandez 1
That's funny because I know a number of people - all white - who have bought houses in that area over the last year. Maybe not "funny" so much as "glaringly obvious."
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on May 15, 2012 at 3:56 PM
Matt the Engineer 2
This just in: Adding Ammenities Raises Land Values.

Next up: SAGE Recommendes Lowering Rents in RV by Removing Electric and Sewer Services.

Adding transit, like any ammenity, will raise prices because people will want to live there. The logical solution is to add more housing. The less logical solution is to force fast food restaurants to pay white collar wages. (Breaking News: RV Loses Fast Food Restaurants, Remaining Few Automate Production and Sales)
Posted by Matt the Engineer on May 15, 2012 at 4:10 PM
3
When it comes to reaching for solutions to this problem, maybe an early step is calling out the NIMBYs who oppose TOD. They have their stated "reasons" for opposing TOD, they claim to want to maintain the character of the neighborhood, but when they oppose the inclusion of more mixed-use affordable housing and more social service organizations, you have to wonder what their true motives are. Maybe it's time to call them out as pro-gentrification, or maybe even xenophobic. It's also worth noting that the intitiatives and steps proposed by SAGE are frequently opposed by Sharon Tomiko-Santos, when she rails against gentrifiers.
Posted by Gidge on May 15, 2012 at 4:10 PM
Will in Seattle 4
You know, the same thing happens when any formerly less desirable neighborhood - due to distance and rundown housing stock - suddenly gets revitalized due to improved transit that makes it faster to get to with new housing stock.

It's called gentrification.

Besides, all the smart people of color have been migrating to Ballard for the last few decades. I don't recall any articles about Scandinavian Communities Under Assault ... people move. Race is such a 20th Century concept here in the West ... admittedly a big deal in the South and the racially separate communities in the East.

I wish Mike well in this, and I encourage affordable childcare near light rail stations, and the return of living wage jobs to SeaTac airport, but I'm not sure how this will really help. What would help more is PEOPLE ON THE EASTSIDE HIRING PEOPLE OF COLOR FOR MIDDLE CLASS WAGES. And by people of color I mean American Citizens, not H1-B visa holders.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 15, 2012 at 4:10 PM
Will in Seattle 5
by the way, the day the SLOG actually mentions an event for communities of color in Rainier Valley is the day I fall down in shock. No, I don't mean the odd restaurant review - those are great. I mean promoting some of the big community events. I don't know how many times I've been one of the only white people in a room planning events down there ... if it wasn't for the arts organizations and city programs, it would be like there's a giant gap between the ID and Seward Park from SLOG's perspective.

Seriously, get a little out of your comfort zone sometimes.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM
6
Oh nos! Will it soon be safe for hipsters to pull out their iPhones again?

So we've paid to build it, we have to pay again to let the po' live near it? Should have run the line Dow
99 straight to Seatac. At least then it wouldn't take a for-fucking-ever to make that trip.
Posted by White people are the worst! on May 15, 2012 at 4:22 PM
You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me 7
"Since construction of the light rail land values around the stations have increased dramatically,"
-Rising property values (in the midst of the great recession)… such a problem to have!

“While the minority population grew by 47 percent over the last decade in King County (and the white population shrank by two percent), in Rainier Valley, the trend is reversed: Communities of color only increased by 5 percent over that same period—and the white population increased by 17 percent.”
-No, If the trend were reversed, the minority population would have shrank while the white population grew. More accurately, both populations grew with greater parity.

“The study notes that 23 percent of low-income Rainier Valley residents depend on public transit to get to work (versus only 14 percent of their more affluent neighbors)”
-Now we’ve transitioned from race to income… or are we to assume that minorities are poor and whites are rich… that’s pretty racist.

"The report highlights, and we hear it over and over again, that the success of light rail threatens to destroy what we find beautiful in the neighborhood,"
-Yes. Rainier Valley used to be so beautiful. Unbearably beautiful.

Fortunately, steps are being taken to halt all this distressing gentrification: http://seattletransitblog.com/2012/04/01…
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on May 15, 2012 at 4:27 PM
pfffter 8

"One of the tricks is figuring out how to do that," O'Brien says. Over the coming months, O'Brien is organizing meetings with his fellow council members and SAGE representatives to figure out how the recommendations can be absorbed by various city entities and projects.


Yes, with a $30 million + deficit, that's going to be quite a trick.
Posted by pfffter on May 15, 2012 at 4:29 PM
9
Good luck fighting the tide on this one.
Posted by Westside forever on May 15, 2012 at 4:36 PM
10
Black people in Ballard? Pix, or it didn't happen.
Posted by tiktok on May 15, 2012 at 4:47 PM
Rotten666 11
The Rainier Valley was going to become wealthier (and whiter) with or without light rail, simply because it is one of the last places in Seattle where single family housing stock is still affordable. Light rail has hastened this reality, as now people young commuters are also interested in TOD and apartments close to light rail.

As @9 side, good luck fighting the tide on this one.

Also, you do know that this was the whole point to begin with, right?
Posted by Rotten666 on May 15, 2012 at 4:51 PM
Will in Seattle 12
Neighbors. Up at 67th and Jones.

Seriously, you see more and more every day.

I didn't say they lived in The Highlands or on the view properties.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 15, 2012 at 4:52 PM
meanie 13
"social justice" is the biggest boondoggle of the progressive left this decade.

Why do we spend money on this again?
Posted by meanie http://www.spicealley.net on May 15, 2012 at 4:56 PM
T 14
I didn't realize you just get to pick your organization's acronym, SAGJHE.
Posted by T on May 15, 2012 at 5:03 PM
pdp 15
This is just dumb. How does a 5 percent RISE in minority population constitute "driving minorities out"??!!
Posted by pdp on May 15, 2012 at 5:09 PM
Fnarf 16
@12, one black family and you've got an epidemic. I swear, you can't hold this stuff in, can you? You're a zero.

"We're pretty good about housing in the city", that's pretty rich. "Affordable retail space" -- there's almost no retail space in the Rainier Valley, for its size. What there is is in strip malls, which don't have the city seal of approval, but the city's alternative is...nothing. Most of the areas around the stations are in fact wastelands (aside from that one building next to Othello).
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on May 15, 2012 at 5:15 PM
17
I moved to SE Seattle because of Light Rail and because of housing affordability. I remodeled my house, fixed up my yard, and I take the train and bus all the time. I know my neighbors and pick up trash on my street. I shop at local business. I am white, and so is my wife, and our 2 kids. My FilipinoVietBlackAfricanMixedRaceMexican neighbors all do pretty much the same things I just described. We know each other. We try to make our lives nice.

But apparently, I am a HUGE PROBLEM for my neighborhood.

Fuck you, SAGE. My block says fuck you and your statistics-driven reality. Down here on the block, it's cool, we're all just getting along, doing what we can/want, and we like each other.
Posted by nullbull on May 15, 2012 at 5:24 PM
McGee 18
@5 "I've been one of the only white people in a room planning events down there [Rainier Valley]..."

And I bet they hated you just as much as we do.

@7 You should double check the date on that article you linked to, shit-for-brains.
Posted by McGee on May 15, 2012 at 5:27 PM
Will in Seattle 19
I didn't say one black family.

Heck, there are 20 black families within three blocks of me in Fremont. But in Ballard, it's been changing over time, as the older Scandiwhovians died off. You'd know that if you paid attention.

Just look at the census data - although that will mask African-Americans since most check multiple boxes on the census form so a standard search by zip in 98117 won't show it, you have to do a multi-racial with at least one African-American answer search.

Seriously, we're becoming multi-ethnic faster than you all realize.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 15, 2012 at 5:28 PM
20
White people leave an area? Racist. White people return to an area? Racist. Pick a lane and stay in it
Posted by Reader01 on May 15, 2012 at 5:30 PM
21
Nothing funnier than liberal white guilt.

Carry on.
Posted by Shits and giggles on May 15, 2012 at 5:32 PM
You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me 22
@18
I keep forgetting that liberals are unable to discern sarcasm. Thanks for reminding me.
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on May 15, 2012 at 5:33 PM
23
@20 Lmao. Thanks for that.
Posted by Shits and giggles on May 15, 2012 at 5:36 PM
24
WiS, it only takes one black family in Ballard to make Fnarf's whitopia on Phinney blush with white guilt. Up there all they can do is adopt Haitian kids.
Posted by Shits and giggles on May 15, 2012 at 5:54 PM
25
I was bemused when the John Fox et al.s fought and defeated the city's proposal to require developers around transit stations to provide low income housing. Their gounds were that it would wipe out the existing low income rentals around stations. The trouble is, owners of existing low income rental housing have no problem selling to developers who will not replace low income housing. This is a surprise?
Posted by crone on May 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM
Will in Seattle 26
@24 you may be right. Which is strange, since BF Day is one of the most multi-cultural multi-ethnic schools in the North End. And Ballard High School is also much more mixed than people think. As is Roosevelt.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 15, 2012 at 6:14 PM
McGee 27
@22 And I keep forgetting that whatever-the-fuck-you-ares always try to hide behind "humor" when called out on their dumb-shittery.
Posted by McGee on May 15, 2012 at 6:48 PM
Rotten666 28
@27 You missed the point two times now.
Posted by Rotten666 on May 15, 2012 at 7:03 PM
29
"Ballard High School is also much more mixed than people think."

The new school boundaries should fix that problem soon with all the Queen Anne and Magnolia kids now assigned there.
Posted by Shits and giggles on May 15, 2012 at 7:22 PM
Fnarf 30
@5, why are you, a fly white guy from Fremont, the only white person in the room planning events in Rainier Valley? Do "those people" need your white expertise or something? Or have you been permanently barred from attending any kind of meetings in your own neighborhood?

You wouldn't recognize census data if it dropped on your house from an airplane.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on May 15, 2012 at 8:10 PM
BLUE 31
"...light rail threatens to destroy what we find beautiful in the neighborhood."

Poverty?
Posted by BLUE on May 15, 2012 at 8:30 PM
ChadK 32
Looks like period troll is on his period again.
It's pretty predictable actually, any post regarding
Socio-economics, crime, or Dan Savage and his
cowardly, anonymous, basement dwelling ass is here
spewing the same Stormfront approved vitriol.
Get a life dude. Find some friends, get a REAL hobby.
I'm sure you're a swell guy in person, but when empowered
by anonymity and an impunitive mouthpiece, you
really let your freak, er, judgmental er, sanctimonious er,
bigot flag fly.
Posted by ChadK on May 15, 2012 at 9:15 PM
33
I think everyone should get worried when a group starts advocating the preservation of a neighborhood for a particular class of people. It sounds scary and impractical, no matter what the status of that group is.
Posted by shotsix on May 15, 2012 at 9:31 PM
34
Can we at least all agree to use the more accurate term "development-oriented transit", rather than the gasbaggery of "transit-oriented development"? Thank you.
Posted by Charlie C on May 15, 2012 at 9:46 PM
Sargon Bighorn 35
It's very clear to me that White people are evil. Gentrification (fixing things up) is evil, and transit is evil. Every child deserves a ghetto to grow up in and the right to walk to every where for lack of transit, which is evil.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on May 15, 2012 at 10:47 PM
seandr 36
How is a 5% increase in the minority population a "tide of displacement."

Some people just don't like white folk. Those people should not be driving city policy.
Posted by seandr on May 15, 2012 at 11:05 PM
ChadK 37
Looks like period troll is on his period again.
It's pretty predictable actually, any post regarding
Socio-economics, crime, or Dan Savage and his
cowardly, anonymous, basement dwelling ass is here
spewing the same Stormfront approved vitriol.
Get a life dude. Find some friends, get a REAL hobby.
I'm sure you're a swell guy in person, but when empowered
by anonymity and an impunitive mouthpiece, you
really let your freak, er, judgmental er, sanctimonious er,
bigot flag fly.
Posted by ChadK on May 16, 2012 at 12:34 AM
onion 38
yeah the statistician in me squirmed at the assertion that a 5% increase was uh....a decrease.
just be honest when writing about the issue. the rate of increase is slowing down. sure, that is indicative of change. but not quite a "tide" yet.
Posted by onion on May 16, 2012 at 5:23 AM
39
lots of properties in RV owned by minorities, including both SFH and multifamily ....the whites buying are often buying from minorities selling....the gentrification also means that for ONCE, minorities who own property got to see its value go up, they got a piece of the ROI on social investment like light rail, so they sold and garnered capital gains and moved somewhere else. This is a good thing. And, btw, if minorities are priced out, or if white folks are priced out, or if anyone is priced out ans has to move to renton....so....what? they're still minorities, they're still white, we still have them, they're participating in the community and they're diversifying the suburbs.

big cities in the middle of big regions over time develop real estate values based on proximity to dowontown; the RC being a 20 minute ride away is valuable; this is normal. the folks who moved INTO RV 50 years ago also displaced someone else. the native americans who lived there displaced someone else. the zulus displaced someone else in southern africa, the vikings displaced someone else when they went to iceland or normandy, there's displacement happening all over. I am glad that north seattle is displacing older homeowner who never go out, the youngsters moving in support more bars and restaurants and it's nice. Let the oldsters move to sequim or the nursing hom or arizona. thehy get to displace people too. the minorities selling out of the RV moving to renton or south county are also displacing ....white people.....why is one displacement bad while other displacement is not bad? certain groups just monger grievances to get handouts from government and overly guilty liberals. of course if you build a $4 billion rail system, SFHs near the close to downtown stations will be more expensive. For ejveryone, poorer whites and poorer minorities. Where are the poor whites in this story, how come their inability to buy in RV now doesn't even merit a mention?
More...
Posted by things change for everyone on May 16, 2012 at 8:08 AM
40
SAGE is right, and the comments here provide ample proof that "New Urbanists" don't give two shits about poor people.
Posted by Mr. X on May 16, 2012 at 8:44 AM
You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me 41
@18
Wow... You really are kind of a dumb ass.
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on May 16, 2012 at 9:11 AM
undead ayn rand 42
@37: I really wish they'd give the Slog admins better tools to deal with that guy.
Posted by undead ayn rand on May 16, 2012 at 10:28 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy