Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

The Erotic Frisson Between Genre and Art

Posted by on Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM

Why is it that comic books—even the artsiest, most prestigious comics—veer so easily, so often into genre? Is it the fact that the special effects budget on a blank sheet of paper is basically limitless? Is it that comics have been steeped in genre for so long that it's more difficult for them to shake off that tradition? Whereas "literary" prose fiction generally avoids genre—with a few, comics-addled big names like Chabon and Lethem as the exceptions that prove the rule—even literary comics are heavy with genre.

kramersergot_8-final-small.jpeg
Not that I'm complaining, mind you. Without genre-fied comics, we wouldn't have Norwegian cartoonist Jason, or his new collection, Athos in America. Jason's stories play with genre the way some poets toy with themes or recurring imagery. The title story puts Athos from the Three Musketeers in the middle of 1920s New York, lamenting the death of his short-lived Hollywood career. A scientist accidentally recreates the dilemma from The Fly, with tragic circumstances, in "Tom Waits on the Moon." A man hunts for a young attractive body to attach to his wife's living severed head in "The Brain That Wouldn't Virginia Woolf." A drunken, misbehaving version of Jason tries to have an affair in the meta-story "A Cat from Heaven." These little stories are moody windows into a very familiar world, but Jason strips the ideas of time-travel and weird science of their wonder and sentimentality, using them instead the way, say, John Updike used extramarital affairs as a shorthand for the complexity of freedom. These are terrific stories using a very familiar language in a fascinating new way.

The new issue of the stellar comics anthology Krames Ergot is packed with genre riffs. The opening story is a short Jimbo yarn by Gary Panter that references Mickey Mouse, Bugs Bunny, Pokemon, and the Hulk. Kevin Huizenga redraws a creepy boy's adventure comic gone wrong that was originally written by an unknown author. Johnny Ryan contributes a (relatively subdued, for him) sci-fi horror story. Not all of the stories here are recognizable takes on genre—this issue is packed with full-color plates of tone poem-like paintings that tell stories completely using geometric shapes and warm, pulsing colors—but more than half of the book calls back to the stories from the early days of comics. And the end of the anthology lovingly reprints a series of full-color painted erotic Oh, Wicked Wanda comics that were originally published in Penthouse in the late seventies and early eighties. These comics are obviously more straightforward examples of genre than the more contemporary stories, but they're also sly, self-aware satires of sexual mores. The juxtaposition of these more classic examples of concrete comics narrative, when placed against some of the spacier, abstract adventures by young cartoonists of today, develop a whole new, sassy attitude and artfulness. It's like they suddenly broke into a whole new genre, just by surviving for so long.

 

Comments (4) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Puty 1
I'll have to pick up the new Kramer's Ergot because I like Kevin Huizenga. Jason's set high standards and I thought his new book was underwhelming. Mediocre Jason is still great, though. I loved his "autobiographical" story. What cartoonist carries a knife?
Posted by Puty on March 28, 2012 at 8:14 AM
2
All texts are in "genre." "Literary" fiction is a genre. Do you mean "lowbrow marginal genres" when you say that even "literary" comics veer into "genre"? I'd argue that this is a sampling error: if you looked at the range of all books published (daily, weekly, monthly, annually) the vast majority are in that kind of "genre" (romance, science fiction, horror). Ditto comics. The overlap here ("serious" comics (defined how exactly?) tell stories that share genres with non-serious comics) I would bet is just more prominent because there are fewer comics overall, and even fewer serious ones.
Posted by Chicago Fan on March 28, 2012 at 8:20 AM
Claypatch 3
I have nothing to add except that I really wish to thank Paul for the review. I appreciate being introduced to new comic authors, and having the form being taken seriously in this manner.

I do want to pose a question about Gilbert Hernandez: do you, or anyone here, feel that his work has contributed to expanding the genre in any way, good or bad. It seems to me that he has, in that his work started out in a fairly "straight" super-hero satire that quickly went into magical realism a la Garcia Marquez, and then ranged over into playing with time by pushing the boundaries of how comics can handle edits in his "Poison River" stories. In any case I'd be curious as to what people think.
Posted by Claypatch on March 28, 2012 at 9:11 AM
4
Interesting theory, but I'm not sure it's correct. If by "genre" you mean "the fantastical genres," comics like Persepolis, Ghost World, Jimmy Corrigan, and the above-mentioned Love and Rockets all come instantly to mind as notable exceptions. Maus is barely genre -- the only fantastical part is the use of cats and mice to tell the story. Strangers in Paradise might be genre, but that genre is romance.

And that's all off the top of my head.
Posted by McJulie on March 28, 2012 at 10:06 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy