...or so says a study, which appears to have actually tried to account for other influencing factors (unlike this study and countless others... Gizmodo can't resist a bit of the usual hyperbole in the headline, however).
In other meat-news, former New York Times restaurant reviewer (and current op-ed columnist) Frank Bruni has gout. It sounds like he's always eaten tons of meat. Moderation, people!
Also, via Eater.com: The pink slime (EW!) story leads a producer to run a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal. I'm no advertising executive, but they might have wanted to lead with something other than this in large-point type:
"After what I personally experienced watching my son suffer and die, I am very skeptical and cynical about for-profit meat companies and their professed commitment to food safety..."

2
3
6
7
All red meat is bad for you, new study says
A long-term study finds that eating any amount and any type increases the risk of premature death.
Eating red meat — any amount and any type — appears to significantly increase the risk of premature death, according to a long-range study that examined the eating habits and health of more than 110,000 adults for more than 20 years.
For instance, adding just one 3-ounce serving of unprocessed red meat — picture a piece of steak no bigger than a deck of cards — to one's daily diet was associated with a 13% greater chance of dying during the course of the study.
Even worse, adding an extra daily serving of processed red meat, such as a hot dog or two slices of bacon, was linked to a 20% higher risk of death during the study.
8
10
11
12
14
15
16
In a widely-studied example, numerous epidemiological studies showed that women who were taking combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) also had a lower-than-average incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD), leading doctors to propose that HRT was protective against CHD. But randomized controlled trials showed that HRT caused a small but statistically significant increase in risk of CHD. Re-analysis of the data from the epidemiological studies showed that women undertaking HRT were more likely to be from higher socio-economic groups (ABC1), with better than average diet and exercise regimens. The use of HRT and decreased incidence of coronary heart disease were coincident effects of a common cause (i.e. the benefits associated with a higher socioeconomic status), rather than cause and effect as had been supposed.
"We found that regularly eating more than the recommended amount of red meat was also related to increased depression and anxiety," Professor Jacka added.
20
24
26
30
Comments (30) RSS