Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Disability Lifeline Saves More Money Than It Costs

Posted by on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM

DLcostsmorethansaves.png
  • Washington State Budget & Policy Center

With whispers of a potential budget deal in the air, Olympia sources tell me that House Democrats are not prepared to budge on the Republicans' proposed elimination of Disability Lifeline, and the Washington State Budget & Policy Center chart above helps explain why: Killing Disability Lifeline would cost more money than it saves.

Republicans propose slicing another $57 million from the state budget by eliminating Disability Lifeline, costing the state $55 million in matching federal funds in the process. But the costs don't end there. Tossing 20,000 disabled low-income Washingtonians—many of them veterans, and most of them with mental disabilities—off the health care rolls and into our streets, prisons, and emergency rooms, would cost the public another $67 million in uncompensated care... an expense that will just be passed on to consumers, businesses, and taxpayers. Then, of course, there's the toll in human suffering, but I've learned long ago that money trumps morals when it comes to politics, so there's not much to be gained by going there.

It's the very definition of penny-wise, pound-foolish. Republicans decry the notion of shifting a payment to public schools by one day, from one biennium to another, but they've got no problem with blithely shifting the costs of caring for our most vulnerable citizens from the state budget onto those of hospitals and clinics.

In defending their austerity budget, Republican after Republican stood on the Senate floor to argue that we just can't afford to fund programs like this any longer. But unless we're willing to just let these people die in emergency room parking lots for lack of coverage, the truth is, we can't afford not to.

 

Comments (7) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
The_Shaved_Bear 1
Same goes for health insurance. We save money by having people insured - for all the same reasons.
Posted by The_Shaved_Bear on March 22, 2012 at 10:52 AM
Phoebe in Wallingford 2
Totally agree Goldy.
Posted by Phoebe in Wallingford on March 22, 2012 at 10:55 AM
thatsnotright 3
My father always called this sort of thing: "Jumping over a dollar to pick up a dime."
Posted by thatsnotright on March 22, 2012 at 10:59 AM
COMTE 4
The first mistake is believing that conservatives care one whit about saving money; they don't. Shifting costs from government agencies onto the shoulders of the private sector achieves two goals: 1.) it reduces the amount on money government needs to bring in, thus shrinking both the overall size of government as well as reducing its ability to control costs in the private sector, and; 2.) cost-shifting creates practically endless opportunities for for-profit companies to upcharge customers and therefore increase their profit margins.

Sure, it costs more - a LOT more - in real dollars to cover these people without the government support, but nobody in their right mind believes for a second health care providers are simply absorbing those additional costs themselves. They pass them along in the form of increased premiums, inflated billing-for-services rates, and a myriad of processing charges and late-payment fees, all of which in the end come directly out of the pockets of their customers. And with each additional amount billed, it's pretty much guaranteed that a healthy profit-margin is factored in, which is really what this is all about.

Anyone who believes any differently is simply deluding themselves..
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on March 22, 2012 at 11:16 AM
5
I remember the day when we did read in the evening newspaper, from time to time, about some poor soul who died on the hospital steps because he was unable to pay the cost of treatment.

I never thought I'd live to see the day when a major political party in this country would advocate policies that would return us to those sad days. But I have.

Posted by Citizen R on March 22, 2012 at 11:37 AM
balderdash 6
You're such a tax-and-spend liberal, Goldy. Hahaha, see what I did there? I said a thing that means absolutely nothing.

Seriously, though, these people do not give one single shit about saving money. It's all an ideological crusade against government itself. They oppose the very concept of mandated collective action, whether it helps people or not.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on March 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM
7
Comte, the people how get medical coverage through DL don't get pay premiums to for-profit insurance companies, nor do they go to private for-profit medical providers. They go to clinics which take Medicaid-like cards, and those clinics are non-profit.
Posted by sarah70 on March 22, 2012 at 2:54 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy