Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Santorum displays intellectual inconsistency

Posted by on Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:32 PM

Surprise, surprise: when he attacks President Obama for not doing enough to fight pornography, Santorum doesn't much like questions about the degree to which the Catholic Church or Penn State (his alma mater) deal with child rapists.

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Posted by venomlash on March 18, 2012 at 8:39 PM
2
And the Catholics don't even like him much: Santorum's base is the fundies.

Santorum didn't make hay in Illinois over the Catholic high school he attended there, but there were protesters from that high school outside his speech.
Posted by judybrowni on March 18, 2012 at 8:58 PM
Zebes 3
Has anybody ever asked Santorum to provide some kind of evidence of the specific problems being caused by these porn peddlers he's convinced are targeting children? You'd think that, if a prominent politician was howling so enthusiastically about some sort of dire threat or another, someone, somewhere, would be at least a little interested in asking him to support his claims. Or does Rick keep himself insulated enough from the media that nobody ever has a chance?
Posted by Zebes http://www.badrap.org/rescue/index.html on March 18, 2012 at 9:14 PM
4
@Zebes: No one took him seriously enough until recently to bother with any questions, but our media don't seem to ask these sort of questions very much to any of the candidates. Romney keeps saying Obama apologizes for America, but no journalists asks him to cite dates, times, places when such apologies took place.
Posted by Chicago Fan on March 18, 2012 at 9:35 PM
mrbarky 5
And about the death penalty. The Catholic Church is OK about child fucking, but is flat out against capital punishment. Santorum supports it (although says it should be limited). Oh, he also lies and says the Catholic church wants it limited. They don't. They want it aboloshed.
Posted by mrbarky on March 18, 2012 at 9:40 PM
6
@3
It isn't a statement that is meant to be considered intellectually.
It is "what about the children?!?" combined with "Obama is not good".

It works at getting the base (who hate Obama) excited.

But, as demonstrated on that radio show, if you bring any kind of intellectual examination to it Santorum gets irritated and refuses to answer any non-softball questions.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on March 18, 2012 at 9:53 PM
rob! 7
He does have intellectual consistency. It's frothy.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on March 18, 2012 at 11:06 PM
8
"OMG! Porn! Think of the children!"

Mind you, we're talking about adult porn, made for adults, starring adults, and Santorum is whining his imaginary mumblesomething about children. But when asked about real adults (priests, assistant coaches) fucking actual little children in their care, and his very own church and school actually covering it up and actively obstructing prosecution, he seems totally disinterested.

At some point it's no longer adequate to call someone like him a hypocrite. The word is far too overused and diluted. "Evil flaming bag of sanctimonious shit," might come a little closer to what he is.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on March 18, 2012 at 11:16 PM
9
One more thought. If porn (made for adults, starring adults, restricted only to be sold to adults, etc.) by its mere existence endangers the lives of children, umm... you know... uh... what about guns?

I don't hear him making the argument that guns (made for adults, sold to adults, proper restrictions, blah, blah, etc.) endanger children. If he was serious about child safety... well, never mind. He's clearly not.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on March 18, 2012 at 11:28 PM
this guy I know in Spokane 10
Wow, that interviewer was really insulting. His question was almost like equating gay marriage with bestiality... or something.
Posted by this guy I know in Spokane on March 19, 2012 at 1:11 AM
11
What a fag.
Posted by Central Scrutinizer on March 19, 2012 at 3:34 AM
12
I am not surprised that Rickie Sanctorum is put off by questions about priest rape. Look at those dead eyes of his and listen to the tortured soul crying out from inside him.

Rickie was "chose" by his parish priest to perform very special services. Now Rickie knows this means he is a special chosen one to God. Sadly, he also knows from training that all sex is dirty and evil and sinful. The conflict has eaten at him ever since.
Posted by frankdawg on March 19, 2012 at 5:18 AM
Theodore Gorath 13
Really sad that we live in a political climate where a presidential candidate can not roundly denounce the rape of children, and the apathy of the adults who were supposed to protect them, because it might hurt his career/campaign donations.

A vote for Rick Santorum is a vote for the vatican, plain and simple. The man can not enforce the seperation of church and state because he does not think they should be seperated.
Posted by Theodore Gorath on March 19, 2012 at 8:01 AM
14
But, but, but…. squirrel!
Posted by Lymis on March 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy