Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

The Wives of Presidential Candidates Lie, Too

Posted by on Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:21 PM

Making her pitch for Mitt Romney's candidacy during stops in conservative corners of Michigan, Ann Romney said Tuesday that her husband was a “little reluctant” about running for president in 2012.

“Mitt was a little reluctant. And when we were making this decision, I thought to myself, you know what? This country is in so much trouble,” Ann said to about 200 Republicans gathered at a GOP luncheon here in Hudsonville.

Come the fuck on, lady. Mitt Romney wasn't going to run for president in 2012? Nobody on earth is dumb enough to believe this particular line of bullshit. Mitt Romney ran a push poll from the inside of his mother's womb. (Unfortunately for Mitt, the placenta won.)

 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Well, consider the audience's average I.Q..
Posted by maddogm13 on February 21, 2012 at 5:57 PM
2
So, if this was a totally new idea... what was he doing running for president in 2008? Did he hit his head and get amnesia in between? Or does he just hope WE all did?
Posted by Pope Buck I on February 21, 2012 at 6:23 PM
Schmapdi 3
Technically it COULD be considered true - since he never really stopped running from 2008. So maybe he hesitated a bit like Nov. 3 2008, for like an hour.
Posted by Schmapdi on February 21, 2012 at 6:33 PM
Max Solomon 4
"i'm reluctant to run because if i do, i'm going to fucking LOSE. and then i'll be a loser".
Posted by Max Solomon on February 21, 2012 at 6:39 PM
5
@#4
You're forgetting that every time the electorate fails to send Mitt to Washington he burnishes his credentials as a Washington Outsider. We can only make him stronger!
Posted by Warren Terra on February 21, 2012 at 6:52 PM
D310 6
What's more offensive to me is the notion that running for President is purely motivated by altruism.

(Re: this country is in so much trouble!")

C'maaaan.
Posted by D310 on February 21, 2012 at 7:40 PM
7
By 2016, he'll really be reluctant because he'll have to use his own billions.
Posted by sarah70 on February 21, 2012 at 7:44 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 8
Gee whiz, you're scraping the bottom of the barrel to say negative things about Republicans no matter the trival nature of the comment.

You know, in polite society, it's generally considered de classe to attack a man's wife like that.

But...well...this is this...
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://yrihf.com on February 21, 2012 at 8:21 PM
9
@8 That's sexist horseshit. Ann Romney is her own woman, not just "a man's wife", and is thus subject to being called out when she's making shit up.
Posted by shabadoo on February 21, 2012 at 8:45 PM
treacle 10
Paul, in all honesty and respect, you're getting a little too deep into their rhetoric. Nothing they say is the truth in any meaningful way. Wait a sec, here, read this. It might help with a broader perspective on the current switch. A little bit of a deeper breath.
Posted by treacle on February 21, 2012 at 8:52 PM
Max Solomon 11
@8: sell it to your fellow conservatives attacking michelle obama for promoting exercise and nutrition.
Posted by Max Solomon on February 21, 2012 at 9:32 PM
12
@4 I about lost it from laughing so hard after reading your post....................too funny and right on.

Posted by ttmix on February 21, 2012 at 9:34 PM
13
@8 I agree with Max Solomon....this President (and his wife) have been more disrespected than any first couple in history.
Posted by ttmix on February 21, 2012 at 9:36 PM
14
@8
Nice work on the "tone troll". But you could do with a few improvements.

"You know, in polite society, it's generally considered de classe to attack a man's wife like that."

No. That's true in cases where the woman is understood to be ONLY the "man's wife".

Fortunately, the "Liberals" have progressed beyond that. Hence the way she was identified as "Ann Romney" rather than "Mrs. Mitt Romney".
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on February 21, 2012 at 11:43 PM
Phoebe in Wallingford 15
Another meaningless post from Paul Constant. Every candidate probably weighs the pros and cons of running over and over again with wives and their advisors.
Posted by Phoebe in Wallingford on February 22, 2012 at 7:32 AM
Asparagus! 16
Oh please, yes Paul is a shitty political journalist, but this is clearly a bald-faced lie on A. Romney's part.
Posted by Asparagus! on February 22, 2012 at 7:47 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy