Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Watching Seattle Crawl Up Its Own Asshole of Public Process and Die There

Posted by on Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:37 AM

4/5 of OPARB, looking totally engaged as the meeting begins.
  • The Stranger
  • 4/5 of OPARB, looking totally engaged as the meeting begins.
Last night's public meeting, hosted by Seattle’s Office of Professional Accountability Review Board (OPARB) at Seattle University, was billed as an "open discussion" to ease tensions between the Seattle Police Department and communities of color, led by Dr. Jay Rothman, a blazer-and-mock-turtleneck-wearing "expert" in conflict resolution.


And clearly, its 100-plus attendees had high hopes: Before the meeting, small groups of people traded war stories about the Seattle Police Department, discussed concerns about what happens next with the Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation and what its findings mean for people of color, and expressed frustrations with OPARB, the civilian office in charge of reviewing the quality and efficacy of the police department's Office of Professional Accountability—which in turn reviews and investigates allegations of police misconduct (in other words, the watchdog's watchdog*).

City council member Bruce Harrell further drummed up people's expectations as the meeting began. "There are no taboo subjects here tonight," Harrell said. "I want you to ask the tough questions. I want to know: Does OPARB have the kind of street cred you’d like them to have? Do they effectively review the OPA or have they gotten off the path of true accountability?"

And the he handed over the microphone to our expert facilitator, Dr. Rothman, and everything promptly went to shit.

*Because Seattle loves its watchdogs smothered in extra process.

Instead of a two-hour "open discussion" on how to overcome the deep-seeded mistrust between minority groups and the Seattle Police Department, Dr. Rothman and his colleagues delivered a seventy minute public lecture on the 2000 Cincinnati race riots and the importance of collaboration, followed up by a condescending video called, A Dynamic Illustration of the Action Evaluation Process.

STAB STAB STAB.

It was literally the most worthless presentation I have ever sat through in my two years of professionally sitting through worthless presentations. If OPARB wanted to publicly flaunt how out of touch and useless it is, it couldn't have found a better mascot than Dr. Rothman. This was not an audience that needed to be lectured on the importance of collaboration; this was an audience packed with civil rights advocates demanding a microphone—a platform to air their concerns, questions, and grievances—as they'd been promised. Members of OPARB should've been listening to them and taking notes instead of trying to sell us a race riot in Cincinnati.

I started reading my email spam for entertainment. Finally, 50 minutes before the meeting was scheduled to end, Dr. Rothman and his colleagues opened the floor to questions. Here are a few worth repeating:

Pamela Masterman-Stearns, leader of the City of Seattle Native Employees group, CANOES: How can our communities get funding coming directly to us to make [the DOJ] process work?

Eric Rachner, victim of police misconduct: The OPA has failed to hold police accountable for misconduct, and clearly OPARB has failed at its job to hold the OPA accountable. How can this process be taken seriously if the people behind this travesty continue to hold their jobs?

Harriet Walden, Mothers for Police Accountability: OPARB doesn’t have the clout or credibility to take this on, they don’t have the system. If OPARB thinks it does, how do they intend to prove it?

None of these questions were answered by members of OPARB, or even handled very professionally by our professional moderator, who seemed flustered at the animosity in the room. More people rose to speak, including members of Occupy Seattle, who predictably called for Seattle to "take to the streets and manifest our own power and get justice for once," followed by Seattle Police Sergeant Jay Shin, who said, "It’s important to the police department to hear your concerns but hopefully, it’s an exchange. Hopefully, you can hear the good and the bad and the ugly on our end."

Before I was a lawyer, I was a black kid walking around. I know what this town is like.
  • The Stranger
  • "Before I was a lawyer, I was a black kid walking around. I know what this town is like."
The "discussion" concluded with moving testimony from a black civil rights lawyer whose name I didn't catch named Ernest Saadiq Morris. "Community action is about change, it’s about concrete change," Morris said, "especially when there’s inequity of power. We are looking at a situation where we are being asked to collaborate with people who have all the power. We’re not being asked to collaborate, we’re being asked to comply."


He continued: "What I want to know is, are you building general consensus by ignoring specific conflict? Because that scares me as a member of an oppressed community."

Once again, OPARB had no response. And with that, the meeting was adjourned with many questions left unanswered and many more unasked.

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
Aaaargh, what a punishing event that must have been for people willing to show up and participate. Thanks for covering it, and so properly acidly.
Posted by gloomy gus on February 8, 2012 at 8:06 AM
Joe Szilagyi 2
Here is what I posted before.

###

McGinn will do nothing, nor will the city council, nor the OPA, nor OPARB, nor Holmes. They're beholden to and terrified of any manner of political or personal retribution from the SPOG leadership. Nothing will change without a citizen initiative of some sort that ties the hands of the city as to the manner of contract agreement that they are allowed to engage with SPOG.

Social justice and civic groups need to do a city initiative that mandates the city is only allowed to enter into SPOG contracts that include the following;

A) Independent civilian leader/commissioner of SPD that answers to and is appointed to fixed terms by the Council. Chief position is now second in command.

B) Civilian oversight/OPA that SPD has no authority, veto, input, or control over. Fair and transparent appeals process, but the ability and authority to discipline police has to come from outside of the police department. The City Council appoints the senior staff and directors of OPA. Police have no control over who is placed in these roles.

C) Mandatory, better than state legal requirement compliance for SPD with public records requests, including those related to OPA actions.

D) Civilian oversight and review of OPA. Let each member of the Council nominate one person for a term, and the Mayor one as well. They city council as a whole signs off on each proposed member by simple majority vote. This 3rd party review board should be stakeholders with legal backgrounds that have full access to review and if needed disclose to the public and media irregularities or problems with the OPA process.

That's how you fix it. That way SPOG has nothing they can do about it, because the city would be unable to legally enter a contract without such terms. SPOG can make all the fuss they want. Those four points aren't there, they get no new deal. The 99.5% of SPD that are good, fine cops will be unaffected by all this. It's the bad cops that would need to be on notice.

Are local groups going to stand up and do something since McGinn and the Council are unwilling to?

Or do we wait for the Federal government to smother SPD to death and cost the city millions with an uncertain end result that may not get minorities what they really need?
More...
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on February 8, 2012 at 8:22 AM
DOUG. 3
The OPA is fucking useless, which makes the OPARB even uselesser. The only accountability facing the SPD is our slow and expensive legal system, and unless you can afford your day in court, the SPD will continue to get away with murder (literally).
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on February 8, 2012 at 8:32 AM
4
@2 Who has the power to fire the chief under the current system?
Posted by Ken Mehlman on February 8, 2012 at 8:45 AM
Joe Szilagyi 5
@4 Given that he is I believe a sworn officer? Probably only God.

This is why the head of SPD can't be a cop.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on February 8, 2012 at 8:52 AM
6
@4: The mayor.

And hell yeah, Joe. SPOG is the problem no one wants to address. There's nothing fundamentally broken with police unions. They function in many other jurisdictions without imposing a stranglehold on management. But the structure of the contract and the current leadership at SPOG -- and that means you, Rich O'Neill -- are the main reasons we'll soon be operating under a consent decree.

Look at the DoJ report -- less than 10% of the officers in SPD are responsible for the majority of use-of-force issues. Who's been protecting them? Take a guess...
Posted by Mr. Happy Sunshine on February 8, 2012 at 8:58 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 7

Look for every hood who has been hassled, there's a bunch of 13 year old kids quietly trying to get to school and get an education so they can move the hell out of the ghetto.

The problem with SPD -- and PDs everwhere in Washington -- is they have been too tepid in dealing with the hard criminals that rule the streets.

Rather than Community Policing, I would have a general Crackdown on all the thugs, psychos and vagrants that have camped permanently on the sidewalks, making it impossible for regular folk to walk the streets at night.

In my estimate the problem is collusion between property owners downtown, who want to keep their values high, and the Mayor's Office starting with Nickles who clearly allowed a whole half of Seattle to decay into criminal anarchy.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://yrihf.com on February 8, 2012 at 9:51 AM
8
"It was literally the most worthless presentation I have ever sat through in my two years of professionally sitting through worthless presentations. "

I am so sorry... So sorry that this shitshow is all you got, at what should have been a pivotal public meeting to begin fixing problems and healing the community.

Most of all, I'm sorry that your line above made me laugh out loud, when the situation is so dire. Seriously, I love that line and its emphatic characterization of the proceedings, not to mention the shittier aspects of your job.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on February 8, 2012 at 10:53 AM
Will in Seattle 9
It's great living in a Dictatorship.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 8, 2012 at 11:02 AM
merry 10
Great article, Cienna - and the Best Headline Ever.

It's true, that's how Seattle likes to do things... or rather, how Seattle likes to pretend that it's doing something when really it's just sitting around taking meetings...
Posted by merry on February 8, 2012 at 11:37 AM
11
deep-SEATED
not deep-seeded
Posted by by the seed of ur pantz on February 8, 2012 at 6:07 PM
Voltairine 12
That sounds truly awful. It also sounds like it wasn't so much a failure of public process, but a complete lack of public process. What did you get? Not what I expected to hear about: the usual interminable meeting filled with thoughts from the bad, the mad, the good, and the brilliant, but a ridiculous irrelevant condescending presentation which took up over half the meeting, followed by a poorly facilitated q lacking any a.
Posted by Voltairine on February 8, 2012 at 10:48 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy