Slog
News & ArtsTuesday, February 7, 2012
Visual Art How Do You Solve A Problem Like Gauguin?
Posted by Jen Graves on Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:00 AM
- By Paul Gauguin/Courtesy the National Gallery of Scotland
- What are you lookin' at?
This morning, Seattle Art Museum is hosting the press preview for Gauguin & Polynesia: An Elusive Paradise. The exhibition opens Thursday. There are virtually no works of art in the Pacific Northwest by the Peruvian-descended French artist Paul Gauguin, according to an essay in the big, fat, hardcover catalog by former SAM director Derrick Cartwright.
This is the first time the museum has ever held a significant display of his works—driven in part by the fact that SAM's Polynesian holdings eclipse its Gauguin non-holdings.
And this show is meant to be different from the rest of the Gauguin shows, which over the years have tended to exacerbate the awfulness of Gauguin's racist, sexist adventures on the "primitive" islands of French Polynesia at the dawn of the 20th century.
"This time," organizers of the show write, "the artworks of Polynesia do not merely serve as a visual background."
How do you solve a problem like Gauguin? We are about to see.
2
This is ridiculous. SAM must already have all the money they need, since they seem dead set against getting any of mine these days.
3
One of my favorite paintings is “Are you jealous?”
(Aha oe feii?)
http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-…
(Aha oe feii?)
http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-…
4
I'll go to the show since I've already paid for my SAM membership for the year. But I'm really dreading this.
5
Gauguin drives me up the wall. The racism, the misogyny, the pedophilia... ugh. And the enduring popularity he receives despite it all. He irks me like no other Primitivist of the late 19th or early 20th centuries.
6
If you find his work emotionally and aesthetically pleasing to you, what the hell else do you need? He was a painter, not a philosopher or a politician.
8
Oh Christ, don't we have anything better to get our undies in a twist about than Gaugin? You find me some 19th century male painters who were not racist and sexist by 21st century definitions. I'll bet that will be a long list.
And he is way more interesting than many of his contemporaries, that 'green grocer' Cezanne for instance (which is what Breton called him). A jerk, sure, but an an interesting nutcase simultaneously.
And he is way more interesting than many of his contemporaries, that 'green grocer' Cezanne for instance (which is what Breton called him). A jerk, sure, but an an interesting nutcase simultaneously.
9
Seriously, sometimes you Seattleites (sp?) surprise we with your willingness to go down any black hole intellectualism throws in front of you. It's something completely distinct from what passes for pretentious bullshit in San Francisco (and the Bay Area is where the publish Bitch!, so we know a thing or two about pretentious, lazy feminist criticism).
How do you solve a problem like Gauguin? You admit that racism in art happened. You place it in its historical context. You appreciate how Gauguin fits into the development of modern painting. You think through it like a fucking person, just like the constitution, the bill or rights, our slave raping founding-fathers, and the rest of fucking history!
That's what studying history involves! Try it.
How do you solve a problem like Gauguin? You admit that racism in art happened. You place it in its historical context. You appreciate how Gauguin fits into the development of modern painting. You think through it like a fucking person, just like the constitution, the bill or rights, our slave raping founding-fathers, and the rest of fucking history!
That's what studying history involves! Try it.
10
IOW:
I would like all my art to conform perfectly to my world view. Including art created before the easy popularity of my modern worldview was formed. I will attempt to create outrage whenever an artist contradicts, even posthumously, my worldview. Because being insecure and inconsistent about my principles drives me to subconsciously feel my worldview is tenuous and weak and therefor requires constant swarm validation and generating outrage makes me feel righteous without having to actually make any real changes myself.
I would like all my art to conform perfectly to my world view. Including art created before the easy popularity of my modern worldview was formed. I will attempt to create outrage whenever an artist contradicts, even posthumously, my worldview. Because being insecure and inconsistent about my principles drives me to subconsciously feel my worldview is tenuous and weak and therefor requires constant swarm validation and generating outrage makes me feel righteous without having to actually make any real changes myself.
11
@9 and @10 - Said better than how I was going to say it.
Can someone post a Gauguin painting that they consider racist and explain why it's racist? I've never gotten that from his paintings, so I'd like to understand what I'm missing. (Is painting half-naked brown people intrinsically racist?)
Can someone post a Gauguin painting that they consider racist and explain why it's racist? I've never gotten that from his paintings, so I'd like to understand what I'm missing. (Is painting half-naked brown people intrinsically racist?)
12
No Gauguin WAS an awful racist by todays standards. Like about 99% of his white European contemporaries. But unlike him they never set about documenting fucking their way across the French colonies. So we tend to remember him for it. He was merely a product of his time and place.
But it's largely irrelevant as to why one should or should not appreciate his art. His art is sublime.
It's certainly worth it to know about the cultural and historical circumstances informing a particular artists work. But self righteous hindsight and moral judgement is rarely going to help with any serious evaluation of his or anyone else's art.
This kind of moral outrage shit would make it nearly impossible to fairly appreciate any historical personage or art. Even the sacred cows of THIS generations hipster artists. William S. Burroughs? Child rapist and Wife Murderer. Gandhi? Horrific sexist who let his wife die. You could go on and on.
But it's largely irrelevant as to why one should or should not appreciate his art. His art is sublime.
It's certainly worth it to know about the cultural and historical circumstances informing a particular artists work. But self righteous hindsight and moral judgement is rarely going to help with any serious evaluation of his or anyone else's art.
This kind of moral outrage shit would make it nearly impossible to fairly appreciate any historical personage or art. Even the sacred cows of THIS generations hipster artists. William S. Burroughs? Child rapist and Wife Murderer. Gandhi? Horrific sexist who let his wife die. You could go on and on.
15
@13 No shit! How do you salve a problem like Picasso, indeed.
Picasso was definitely an asshole. Yet. I never heard anybody talk of protesting or withholding contributions (or any other such drama) to SAM over him.
Picasso was definitely an asshole. Yet. I never heard anybody talk of protesting or withholding contributions (or any other such drama) to SAM over him.
16
BTW Gauguin's mother, Flora Tristan, was (for lack of a better word) feminist and socialist pioneer. In Peru. Where such a thing was hardly fashionable or safe.
17
Jen- puhleez....you embarrass SAM, TheStranger, Seattle, etc. You write like a zealous, narrow visioned, recent convert to anti-racism. Please, stick to what you know, although I don't know what that would be. Not art, not history, not comparative research. And if you must (I wish you wouldn't) back up yr opinions with evidence. That's what good art writers do. Oh my god, this man lusted after beautiful brown women-- the pig
18
I grew up appreciating Gauguin without any thought of his lifestyle or how he treated his wife or women, etc.........while I appreciate the relevance of the mans morals and character, when it comes to viewing his art, I personally am glad that I spent over 50 years just loving the guys creative results without delving into who he offended or injured. I hope to put this other out of my mind and just continue to admire the freshness of his vision and my fascination with his decision to go where no other artist had gone before. I recently viewed the show at the SeattleAM with a dear friend who was very focused on the artists character flaws. It altered my experience. I think it's a bit late to boycott this man. He wasn't a very good husband or father, and it's a shame he probably infected other people with his STD, however, his paintings still intrigue me and they stand out even now. That's the end of the story for me.........I'm not going to boycott him. I just won't encourage my daughter to marry an artist with similar tendencies.
19
I find something dark and disturbing about the way he portrays women just on instinct. As a woman, a half hispanic one with dark skin, it scares me. I avoid his work. No intellectualism needed. I can do that act too-- contextualize his work in terms of cultural norms of the time and art history. But you can also just sense his brutishness in his paintings. The women don't feel like individual people. They are his objects. there is a lack of humanity in the way he sees them. They are something other than people. Perhaps they are metaphors. But using women like this symbolically also given his history is scary. Yes there are other lovely things in the paintings-- the sensualness of the colors and textures, etc. but that vacancy that his female subjects have to me is palpable. I wonder if women (and maybe even more so women of some non-European descent) feel something in the paintings along the lines I'm talking about more than the men (even mores so European descended men) do?
Advertisement
Most Commented on Slog
-
It's Spring! Who's Ready for Street Harassment? by Cienna Madrid
-
New Gun Enthusiast... by Dan Savage
-
SL Letter of the Day: Gonna Boil My Laptop After Answering This One by Dan Savage
-
America Doesn't Care About Black People by Charles Mudede
-
Bigot Florist Files Countersuit by Dominic Holden
-
US Military Grants Itself the Power to Police American Streets and "Quell" "Civil Disturbances" by Brendan Kiley
-
SL Letter of the Day: Living Discomfortably by Dan Savage
-
Slog Super Poll: Who Should Be Mayor? by Dominic Holden
-
Black Market Elimination Fail: Draft Pot Rules Call for Ban on Hash and Hash Oil by Ben Livingston
-
Tim Burgess Quits the Mayor's Race by Dominic Holden
Stranger Personals
The Stranger
RSSSeattle Art & Performance Quarterly
A complete guide to Seattle's current art, film, dance, and theater season.
Facebook
Twitter
Comments (19) RSS