Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Drinking at the Movies

Posted by on Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:22 PM

In thrilling news from Olympia, house bill 2558, which would allow adults to buy and drink alcohol at the movies, is getting some amendments:

1. Multiplexes can apply for a license, but only one room can be booze-friendly.

2. The definition of "theater" has been broadened from cinema to: "A place where motion pictures or live musical, dance, artistic, dramatic, literary, or educational performances are shown."

The bill also requires a "minor control plan" to keep children sober, but doesn't specify what that would look like.

(The background to the bill is here—basically, legislators from the Vancouver area introduced it because a renovated movie place down that way wants to get into the brew 'n' view business.)

In other brew 'n' view news: Central Cinema, the Central District's beloved TV room since 2005, recently realized that it was in an awkward legal situation after the Washington State Liquor Control Board rewrote a rule in 2010. The rule change states that if you're a movie theater selling hooch, "no minors would be allowed on the entire premises at all times." Not just when they're serving alcohol—ever.

Kevin Spitzer, who runs Central Cinema, says that would cut at least a third out of his business: The theater has family sing-along events, cartoon programming, children's films, hosts neighborhood parties, serves as a de facto classroom for the Reel Grrls education nonprofit, and lots of other family- and kid-oriented stuff.

Spitzer didn't realize the rules had even been rewritten until he applied for a liquor license (currently the cinema serves only beer and wine) and was told his business plan and until-now spotless record with the WSLCB had been bureaucratically reclassified into perdition.

Since it serves a full menu, the cinema had been running until recently with a restaurant beer-and-wine license like the Triple Door, Jazz Alley, Teatro ZinZanni, and other places with food, drinks, and entertainment. But the rule change (you can read its thrill-a-minute text here) clumsily dictated that movie screen + alcohol service = no minors shall darken your doors.

There are philosophical issues at play in both situations. The house bill, for example, talks about "minimize minors' exposure to a drinking environment." And Spitzer says some people criticize Central Cinema just because minors can witness adults drinking alcohol.

"There’s this attitude that people only drink in this country to get fucked up," he says. "There's no idea of socialization and learning the right way to do it with your family. Then most people’s first experiences with alcohol are spring break and going too far. Binge drinking is so high in this country because kids grow up in this prohibition atmosphere—people don’t even want kids to see drinking!"

But, Spitzer says, the WSLCB has expressed interest in finding a solution. And his concerned calls to city hall have earned him a letter signed by the city council, the mayor, and the city attorney asking the WSLCB to change or strike the 2010 rule.

The wheels of government turn slowly, but things are looking up for Washingtonians who like to drink at the movies but feel nervous about sneaking in their own liquor.

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
My eloquent point should be reduced to:

(sarcasm)

Central cinema: bad adults drinking at a re-run show house!

(M)TV: Jersey Shore!

Which are these vulnerable children around more I wonder. (/sarcasm)
Posted by barfy cute on February 7, 2012 at 3:33 PM
2
Because I know I only go to the movies so I can listen to drunken idiots give their commentary.
Posted by suddenlyorcas on February 7, 2012 at 3:41 PM
3
That's why you come to Slog, after all!
Posted by Brendan Kiley on February 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM
Matt the Engineer 4
Next up: no more alcohol at restaurants. Think of the children!
Posted by Matt the Engineer on February 7, 2012 at 3:50 PM
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn 5
Washington does not need to have any Liquor Control Board. Let cities like Seattle or Cascade make their own rules.
Posted by Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn on February 7, 2012 at 3:52 PM
scary tyler moore 6
you wanna drink at the movies, go ahead. i reserve the right to tell you to STFU if you can't behave yourselves.
Posted by scary tyler moore http://pushymcshove.blogspot.com/ on February 7, 2012 at 3:55 PM
Fnarf 7
I SAID, I'LL HAVE A CARPA DEENA. I MEAN A CRAP EYE REENDA. NO, I SAID KYPER NEENA. HERE, IT'S RIGHT HERE. OH, CAIPARINHA. SORRY. WHATEVER. FUCK. YOU'RE OUT OF IT? OK, A RUM AND COKE. RUM AND COKE! HEY, YOU GOT ANY NACHOS OR SOMETHING?

No thanks.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 7, 2012 at 4:32 PM
8
Portland has plenty of theaters that sell beer,wine, and food.
If that's not your thing don't go.
Posted by fugatone on February 7, 2012 at 4:59 PM
dlauri 9
As an Ohioan I'm surprised that in this case my state is more progressive than Washington State. We may not be close to having marriage equality, but our cinemas are allowed to sell alcohol (not all choose to do so, but many do), and the ones that do sell alcohol don't even have to keep minors out.

Of course we also have drive through liquor stores. I guess we really embrace alcohol.
Posted by dlauri http://www.davidlauri.com on February 7, 2012 at 5:06 PM
merry 10
Drinking in theatres? Got no problem with that...

However, I still miss the great services of "iBooze"...

How much longer will the good people of WA have to wait for their God-given right to have LIQUOR DELIVERED TO THEIR HOMES??? is what I wanna know... sheesh....
Posted by merry on February 7, 2012 at 5:23 PM
veo_ 11
iBooze also delivered psychedelics. That was nice.
Posted by veo_ on February 7, 2012 at 6:00 PM
DOUG. 12
Washington has a swizzle stick up its ass.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on February 7, 2012 at 6:08 PM
the idiot formerly known as kk 13
This is nothing compared to the Washington of the 1960s, where women could not be served alcohol while sitting at a bar and taverns could not have windows facing onto a sidewalk.

Well into the 1990s, liquor could be served only at an establishment that received a certain percentage of its revenues from food sales (thus, cheap "steak" dinners--and later teriyaki--or the infamous Neighbours buffet, purportedly provided in exchange for the cover charge).

And even today, you can download XXX porn in the library with your kids, but you can't watch a nudie video in a bar.

What a weird place.
Posted by the idiot formerly known as kk on February 7, 2012 at 10:47 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy