Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, February 6, 2012

Conservatives Never Liked Clint Eastwood, Anyway

Posted by on Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:24 PM

As Charles already pointed out, Clint Eastwood's Chrysler Superbowl ad seemed like a commercial for the Obama Administration. And conservatives are already punching back at Eastwood for it. Karl Rove was "offended" by the ad. (Mitt Romney, always ahead of the times, wrote his response to the ad back in 2008.) The backpedaling continues on National Review's The Corner blog, where Christian Schneider breaks out the snark:

It makes sense that Chrysler would want Clint Eastwood to narrate its “Halftime in America” Super Bowl ad; the stoic, gravelly 82-year-old actor exudes old-school charm. His mere presence harkens back to a pre-auto-bailout day when people paid for American cars by actually purchasing them, not by filling out their 1040EZ tax forms. (Although Eastwood represents modern America fairly well, too, as he has fathered seven children with five different women.)

I love when Schneider responds to Eastwood's claims that he's "seen a lot of tough eras, a lot of downturns in my life" with a dismissive "Huh?" Eastwood was born at the very beginning of the Great Depression, which was a pretty big downturn, I think, and he was a boy during World War II, which was kind of a tough era. But the best part, as always, is when the commenters get into the act:

Thanks a lot, Clint, for moving to the dark side. Apparently, at 82, he isn't as aware as he used to be and didn't realize there was an undercurrent of politics in the ad. I can't imagine any other reason why a guy who seems to want the best for this country - a guy who was once a Republican - would appear in a pro-union, pro-Democratic. pro-Obama ad.

Surprising to see Eastwood, a self-described libertarian, as spokesman for welfare queen Chrysler.

No one's going to hear the roar of anything if the auto industry keeps pushing tiny vehicles (the failed Fiat for example), some of which don't even have a combustion engine.

The man is a serial impregnater.

The ad was a hodge-podge of patriotic cliches and made absolutely no sense to me. "Yay us Americans" or...something. I came away vaguely annoyed by the whole thing.

Meanwhile, Chrysler's slogan is "imported from Detroit." What could possibly capture the signature Obama haughtiness any better? Yes, America, Detroit is the advance case of what Obama has in mind for the country. He said he wanted "fundamental transformation," and he meant it. He wants America to become a standard-issue Eurosclerocracy — as Detroit already has to the maximum amount possible short of secession. And, of course, secession is what would be LITERALLY required to make "imported from Detroit" a reality. Sometimes cleverness is not a net plus — especially when it causes a premature tip of the hand.

I was both shocked by Eastwood being part of the ad (I thought he had better principles), and disgusted by the message. How could it be "halftime" for Chrysler when they got bailed out before? And, yes, the entire thing sounded like a friggin' campaign commercial for The Lord of the Autos.

What's so treacherous about these "feel good" ads is that most folks are unaware they're being manipulated because the messenger is someone they trust, someone they don't expect to be a handmaiden of the Democratic Party.

Speaking of the Democratic Party, I think this ad is relevant:

 

Comments (20) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
crivins 1
These people (and I use the term with caution) have never actually been to Detroit, have they? Fuck them. (I'm a GM lady myself, but I'll step up for Chrysler products...)
Posted by crivins on February 6, 2012 at 1:40 PM
bleedingheartlibertarian 2
Clearly, we have a surplus of pundits.

Posted by bleedingheartlibertarian on February 6, 2012 at 1:49 PM
Danger 3
I think Eastwood is saying that America will end in 2248.
Posted by Danger on February 6, 2012 at 1:54 PM
Vince 4
Clint made my day.
Posted by Vince on February 6, 2012 at 1:58 PM
sirkowski 5
Who would make a better dad? Clint Eastwood or Newt Gingrich? 'nuff said.
Posted by sirkowski http://www.missdynamite.com on February 6, 2012 at 2:00 PM
6
Is anyone else tired of this manufactured outrage? Who is it, Rove, who sends out the call to arms and the buzz phrases to use?

@5 Fuck yeah. You nailed it.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on February 6, 2012 at 2:56 PM
dwightmoodyforgetsthings 7
@5- A wire frame monkey would be better than Gingrich.
Posted by dwightmoodyforgetsthings http://www.reddit.com/r/spaceclop on February 6, 2012 at 2:58 PM
8
So Clint Eastwood is a serial impregnater? So what? Isn't one of the candidates for President a serial marriage participant?
Posted by Patricia Kayden on February 6, 2012 at 3:19 PM
9
Why are the parts about his paternal history bolded as if they're particularly offensive in some way? 7 kids by 5 different women is fundamentally irresponsible no matter who you are.
Posted by Reader01 on February 6, 2012 at 3:22 PM
10
@8 What does that make Santorum, I wonder?
Posted by FonsieScheme on February 6, 2012 at 3:23 PM
11
Fiats don't have combustion engines? They run on government hand outs?
Posted by Dave M on February 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM
Peteykins 12
Wow, remember when Republicans used to support American industry?
Posted by Peteykins http://sparklepony.blogspot.com on February 6, 2012 at 3:28 PM
13
This isn't about Eastwood.

It's about how Obama and the stimulus saved Chrysler and tens of thousands of jobs. And how the GOP was AGAINST saving these American companies.

And the GOP doesn't want the facts of that narrative gaining traction. So they will smear any messenger that adopts it.
Posted by tkc on February 6, 2012 at 3:31 PM
14
You have to love these Republicans...now they even turn on their own for suggesting that our country is turning it around or at least can. I wonder what their take would be if the commercial used a large bank or AIG......they would probably interpret it as a pro-Republican ad then.
Posted by k-robert on February 6, 2012 at 3:37 PM
Daddy Love 15
They completely missed the point of Gran Torino. Of course.
Posted by Daddy Love on February 6, 2012 at 3:37 PM
Urgutha Forka 16
It's a fucking advertisement. Not everything on earth is about politics. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on February 6, 2012 at 3:46 PM
Cynic Romantic 17
"The ad was a hodge-podge of patriotic cliches and made absolutely no sense to me. "Yay us Americans" or...something. I came away vaguely annoyed by the whole thing." This mirrors my attitude pretty well.

And the reason people think it's a political ad? Because they are so fond of using "a hodge-podge of patriotic cliches" to sell their product also.
Posted by Cynic Romantic on February 6, 2012 at 4:38 PM
18
When did Tim Pawlenty start wearing pale pink lipstick?
Posted by midwaypete on February 6, 2012 at 6:27 PM
19
If any of those commentors have cable TV in their caves, they can watch Audi running a brace of hybrids in the 24 Hours of Le Mans in June.
Posted by Toe Tag on February 6, 2012 at 8:28 PM
20
Anything that offends Rove is fine by me.
Posted by Bugnroolet on February 7, 2012 at 9:48 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy