Remember those important home foreclosure bills (here, here, and here) that I've been following?
One of them, SB 6070, would shed light on the mysterious world of mortgage securitization by forcing big banks to record, in the county of the property in question, every selling and re-selling and re-packaging of a particular home's mortgage.
This would raise money for cash-strapped counties while also allowing home owners—including those facing foreclosure—to figure out who really owns their mortgage, all without the homeowner having to go to MERS.
You ask: What's MERS?
Take it away, New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman:
NEW YORK, Feb 3 (Reuters) - New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman on Friday accused three major U.S. banks of fraudulently using an electronic mortgage database to avoid the need for recording mortgage transfers...
"The mortgage industry created MERS to allow financial institutions to evade county recording fees, avoid the need to publicly record mortgage transfers and facilitate the rapid sale and securitization of mortgages en masse," Schneiderman said.
But down in Olympia, SB 6070—which addresses exactly the problem that the New York AG is now going to court about—won't be going anywhere except an extended study session that could last until December. Here's what went down when the bill was recently discussed at Sen. Steve Hobbs's Financial Institutions, Housing & Insurance Committee:
1
2
4
5
Comments (9) RSS