Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, February 2, 2012

NOM Will Fund Gay-Marriage Repeal Campaign

Posted by on Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:27 PM

From the National Organization for Marriage's website:

"Washington legislators may think it's politically fashionable to follow Hollywood over the cliff, but they will soon learn there are consequences to their actions," [Brian Brown, the president of the National Organization for Marriage] said. "Maine voters vetoed their gay marriage law and then a year later threw the legislators out of office. In Iowa, voters kicked three judges off their state Supreme court for deciding to impose same-sex marriage. And in New Hampshire, voters also ended the careers of legislators who voted for gay marriage. The same thing will happen in Washington state."

The National Organization will work with allies in Washington to qualify a referendum to overturn the law, just as it did in Maine and California.

This isn't a surprise—in September I wrote about NOM's impending bigot shit storm—but now it's here. Grab your umbrellas, it's gonna be raining bigot shit!

 

Comments (37) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
National Organization FOR Marriage? Yeah, right.
Posted by maddogm13 on February 2, 2012 at 6:30 PM
2
I'm with #1, what the fuck is a organization that is trying to prohibit marriage doing calling themselves "for" marriage.

Well, I know where I'm spending my donations...To the opposition! I hate haters. I hate hate. I love love.

Hey hey, ho ho, if you're a bro and you wanna marry a bro, in my book it's a go!!!

sorry.
Posted by scratchmaster joe on February 2, 2012 at 6:37 PM
3
I say, bring it on. Let's bankrupt the fuckers.
Posted by maddogm13 on February 2, 2012 at 6:40 PM
Simply Me 4
NOM also forgot the rest of the story. In Iowa, when given a choice to pick an anti-gay candidate that would have handed the State Senate to the Republicans who are itching for a constitutional amendment, they chose the progressive, pro equality candidate instead. NOM is all smoke and mirrors. Nothing they say should ever be reported as fact.

That said, they will spend millions spreading their lies in Washington, so we will have to compete in kind. I just donated to Washington United for Marriage. So should you http://www.washingtonunited.org
Posted by Simply Me on February 2, 2012 at 6:51 PM
balderdash 5
Man, if "[B]ut they will soon learn there are consequences to their actions" isn't a thinly-veiled threat, I don't know what is. It's impossible not to read it in a Mafioso voice. Good job inspiring the Jared Loughners of the world, you guys. Very timely and responsible.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on February 2, 2012 at 6:55 PM
6
Ugh. Who ARE these people.
Posted by Prettybetsy on February 2, 2012 at 6:58 PM
7
I really want them to try to get Ed Murray voted out of office. That train wreck would be very entertaining to watch. Ya think Capitol Hill gives a shit about YOUR god? Naw.
Posted by Devin on February 2, 2012 at 6:58 PM
8
I'd be willing to bet that the number of closet cases in NOM exceeds even the Navy.
Posted by also on February 2, 2012 at 7:00 PM
Keister Button 9
Why isn't NOM hammering the heterosexual nonchalant divorcers? Newt Gingrich with all his divorces is a threat to the sanctity of marriage, especially as he claims to be Catholic, not someone who wants and deserves legal recognition and rights of his or her vows for lifelong commitment. The NOM website's bigotry and double-standard are apparent.
Posted by Keister Button on February 2, 2012 at 7:07 PM
Baconcat 10
Repeat after me: "out of state special interest group NOM"
Posted by Baconcat on February 2, 2012 at 7:11 PM
11
A few years ago I would've worried that they might be able to pull it off here. But now?

Bring it on motherfuckers! I'd love to see them not even qualify for the ballot. But I'd really love to see them go down in fucking flames at the ballot box. A huge public trouncing would be so cool.

Maybe I'm overestimating right now because of the joy of yesterday...but I don't think so. I think we've turned a corner in Washington.
Posted by gnossos on February 2, 2012 at 7:12 PM
Cracker Jack 12
Use Prop 8 to beat the bejeebus out of these hate-fuckers. Let everyone who isn't a knee-jerk "no" understand that these are people from out of state who have no interest in the well being of the people of Washington state. That they are dropping money from people from out of state who have no interest in the well being of the people of Washington state.

Expose them. Expose their lies. Use the opportunity to discredit these people even further for the good of the next state that bravely promotes equality!
Posted by Cracker Jack on February 2, 2012 at 7:13 PM
Posted by EFB on February 2, 2012 at 7:18 PM
14
i think the bigots are going to lose this one. washington is much more libertarian on social issues than any other state that they have tried this shit in. and we've already beat their asses on everything BUT marriage. this is going to be a big loser for them & i think another big swing in the tide against anti-gay hate.
Posted by philosophy school dropout on February 2, 2012 at 7:34 PM
15
I deal with some fairly conservative people on a regular basis. Today I was expecting they would be batshit crazy over the approval of gay marriage. I heard nothing. I finally brought it up with one whom I can usually count on for religious justification of everything I can't stand. She shrugged her shoulders and said the idea of gay marriage really didn't bother her that much anymore and she understood that it was for custody of children and for benefits and inheritance. For once, I was the one left with my mouth hanging open in shock. I don't think NOM is going to get as much traction with WA State residents as they might think.
We'll see if the Mormon church decides to pull the same heavy-handed tactics as they did in California. I did not see any mention of the vote in WA in either the Salt Lake Tribune or the church's own tv station and news affiliate yet, but then they are just "breaking" with the Komen/PP story....
Posted by StuckInUtah on February 2, 2012 at 7:39 PM
bstewart23 16
By "NOM" you mean the Cathaholic Church, their major funding source, right?
Posted by bstewart23 on February 2, 2012 at 7:46 PM
Joe Szilagyi 17
Repeat after me: "out of state special interest group NOM"
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://twitter.com/joeszi on February 2, 2012 at 7:54 PM
18
Hmm, as I write 17 posts here and no crazed Biblical quotations about eternal damnation. That tells me something.
Posted by maddogm13 on February 2, 2012 at 8:37 PM
COMTE 19
@18:

Yeah, it tells you this ain't The Seattle Times comment section...
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on February 2, 2012 at 9:31 PM
20
San Fran thought California was safe, too. Then the mormons and the catholics pooled their money from god only knows where (hahah) and all went to shit.

It's going to be a fight and we all need to get armored up.

Don't shrug it off.
Posted by Brad in Seattle on February 2, 2012 at 9:32 PM
21
National Organization for the Allegedly Monogamous Heterosexual Breeding Pair.
Posted by LMcGuff http://holyoutlaw.livejournal.com/ on February 2, 2012 at 9:58 PM
22
Pervert Fag Activist lobby? You're going to have to fight normal folks pretty hard before you ruin marriage for them. Yeah, in New York you could ignore the will of the people, but we're lucky here, we can overturn bad law by referendum. Expect NOM and every other group defending marriage from you fudge packing, rug munching deviants to spend lots of money and time helping us out in Washington.

See you at the end when we overturn this fucked up legislation perverts.
Posted by Real marriage ain't for faggots on February 2, 2012 at 10:12 PM
very bad homo 23
They don't know what they're in for. We're going to win this one.
Posted by very bad homo on February 2, 2012 at 10:19 PM
mackro 24
I'm torn between confidence and putting on my battle armor.

I know in my heart that Washington state won't take shit from NOM. But we *should not take this lightly*.

A prospective Rob McKenna's Voter Guide pamphlet will cost little money and do a lot of damage for marriage equality alone. Jay Inslee likes posting on Facebook, but he's not out there AT ALL. Jay, hey, wake up or something. You only have a governor's race to lose.

Please donate to Washington United For Marriage and any other organization fighting the same fight.

Let your friends and family in this state know that if they sign some person's binder for "some marriage referendum", their name will be PUBLIC, and perhaps for a very wrong reason. Let pro-equality businesses know to watch out for signature gatherers this winter and spring.

Most importantly, please calmly ask any of your closeted friends to come out.. especially to family, if that situation is applicable. If they do so, it could make a big difference.

Only if *all of the above* happens, then we have a chance. I have hope all of the above will happen -- but we'll have to work our asses off to make this bill stick for good. It's completely worth it.

In the immortal words of the Pink Fairies: "DON'T THINK ABOUT IT. DO IT! DO IT!"
Posted by mackro http://mackro.blogspot.com on February 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM
Reverse Polarity 25
@20 is, sadly, correct. We can lose this easily.

Sure, the pro-marriage equality polled ahead by a few points in one recent poll. That does not mean it's a lock.
(1) Older people tend to be more consistent voters, and older people are the one voting block that polls against marriage equality.
(2) NOM is jumping in early, but the Mormons threw millions of dollars to defeat marriage in California, and they'll do it here too.
(3) Voters are fickle and easily manipulated. Negative campaigns work. You can count on this being a very negative campaign from NOM and the mormons.

This can easily go either way. All NOM has to do is throw out enough negative ads to shift the numbers a couple points to the no side, and my marriage does down in flames.

DO NOT BE COMPLACENT.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on February 3, 2012 at 12:12 AM
venomlash 26
@22: You mad, brah?
Posted by venomlash on February 3, 2012 at 1:35 AM
Aurora Erratic 27
I see NOM isn't mentioning that marriage equality will be on the ballot this year in Maine, and is expected to pass. Also, NOM is getting their heads handed to them in court over their involvement in Maine's last marriage equality battle.
Posted by Aurora Erratic http://www.finemesspottery.com on February 3, 2012 at 2:53 AM
Andy Niable 28
People get ready...
Posted by Andy Niable on February 3, 2012 at 3:14 AM
29
I know you guys will see this today, but from yesterday:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/new…
This was completely heartbreaking for me.

Meanwhile, HRC is giving Goldman Sachs an honorary dinner. It's worth signing the petition against that.
Posted by Steve311 on February 3, 2012 at 5:38 AM
30
Well, sorry for the double post. It's the article in rolling stone about gay teens in minnesota committing suicide. I worry about suicide clusters like that occurring, but reading about it is still important.
Posted by Steve311 on February 3, 2012 at 5:40 AM
31
When the hell will they be forced to disclose their donors? They're already in violation of election laws in a whole bunch of states.

Can't someone get a restraining order on them pending the final Supreme Court case?
Posted by Lymis on February 3, 2012 at 5:55 AM
TheRain 32
When you combine the fact that whoever is at the top of the ticket is going to be a disaster with the presence of marijuana legalization and a likely referendum on marriage equality, Rob McKenna has gotten quite a bit weaker based on factors that have nothing to do with him.
Posted by TheRain on February 3, 2012 at 6:33 AM
TLjr 33
Checks can help, but winning will require all supporters to press the flesh statewide. Be ready to talk it up with your parents, your grandparents, and all their friends.

Oh, and all your cool, hipster, pierced, espresso -sipping Seattle friends? Make damn sure they're registered to vote, and make damn sure they vote on election day.
Posted by TLjr on February 3, 2012 at 6:39 AM
Rob in Baltimore 34
22, if your marriage is ruined, that's your own damn fault.
Posted by Rob in Baltimore http://www.wishbookweb.com/ on February 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM
35
@33: You might want to avoid saying "press the flesh" in the context of gay marriage.
Posted by also on February 3, 2012 at 10:01 AM
scary tyler moore 36
bring. it. on, bitches!
Posted by scary tyler moore http://pushymcshove.blogspot.com/ on February 3, 2012 at 1:27 PM
37
They sound like the anti-gay mafia. Little whi- ba ba have a prob prob with peepee on peepee?
Posted by anal smith on March 27, 2012 at 12:55 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy