Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

The Burmese Pythons of Florida

Posted by on Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:05 AM

BBC:

Non-native Burmese pythons are the likely cause of a dramatic mammal decline in Florida's Everglades.

A team studied road surveys of mammals in the Everglades National Park before and after pythons became common.

Researchers found a strong link between the spread of pythons and drops in recorded sightings of racoons, rabbits, bobcats and other species.

The pythons were introduced to this part of the world by way of the pet trade.
Earlier this month, US Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced that the US was poised to approve a ban on importing Burmese pythons. But some observers remarked that the move was about 30 years too late.
The pythons not only eat minor mammals but also go after alligators.

 

Comments (30) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Max Solomon 1
florduh has enough rednecks with guns and boats to make a dent in the python population. organize a statewide hunt.
Posted by Max Solomon on January 31, 2012 at 8:19 AM
lark 2
Good Morning Charles,
I just read that in the morning paper accompanied by a photo of one of the bigger critters. The numbers of mammals consumed by them astonished me. They are definitely a problem. Clearly, they shouldn't have been introduced.
Posted by lark on January 31, 2012 at 8:19 AM
Matt from Denver 3
The pet trade... and the unfortunate way Americans believe that it's alright to discard pets when they're no longer wanted.
Posted by Matt from Denver on January 31, 2012 at 8:30 AM
Vince 4
If snake predation is a problem now it's because there are large numbers of animals to prey on. But in nature, with less prey because of over predation, the snake populations will reduce. Than the prey populations will increase and relative balances can be reached. Because snakes populate areas where there is a balance with prey. Too many rabbits and racoons can be a problem as well. Surely the planet's climate changes, of which there have been many, created similar situations in the past. We see today Snowy Owls in unprecedented numbers flowing down to the states where they normally don't prey. They surely change the numbers of prey animals they normally wouldn't prey on. This is just speculation on my part.
Posted by Vince on January 31, 2012 at 8:36 AM
gttim 5
Salazar, meet horse and barn door! Horse and barn door, meet Salazar!
Posted by gttim on January 31, 2012 at 8:38 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 6
Vince gets it right. This is just a normal part of nature.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on January 31, 2012 at 8:41 AM
Matt from Denver 7
@ 4, @ 6, no, invasive species introduced by irresponsible humans, as the pet owners who release exotic pets into the wild are, isn't part of nature at all.
Posted by Matt from Denver on January 31, 2012 at 9:07 AM
Sargon Bighorn 8
The Everglades is the only National Park that is still under threat of destruction, from an animal other than man.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on January 31, 2012 at 9:28 AM
Vince 9
@7 You're correct. But rats are a species introduced by humans too. And I bet they've settled in quite comfortably in their environment. I would bet there is enough demand for snake skin to bring the numbers under control quickly, as well.
Posted by Vince on January 31, 2012 at 9:35 AM
10
OLN has an entire show about these pythons... in the very first episode they debunk the 'reckless pet owner' myth.
In 2003, a hurricane struck Florida, and a 'breeding facility' lost thousands and thousands of young Burmese pythons. This is believed to be the major cause of the current problem.
One dude getting bored with his albino boa isn't to blame. Some barely-regulated research facility storing snakes in a hut in the Everglades during hurricane season? Now there's your problem...
Posted by jren on January 31, 2012 at 9:36 AM
OuterCow 11
@7 Didn't we go over this one ad nauseum the other day? Since humans are part of nature, anything we do, like add new species to a given environment, is natural. May not be good for the current equilibrium of an ecosystem, but it's still natural. If birds transplanting strange seeds to islands is natural, then so is this.
Posted by OuterCow on January 31, 2012 at 9:44 AM
Geraldo Riviera 12
No, Vince is totally correct @4. If it weren't for the overpopulation of native mammals, these pythons would have had no reason to swim to Florida to help us clean up the mess. If there wasn't a food source, they would't be feeding. It's as simple as that.
Posted by Geraldo Riviera on January 31, 2012 at 10:33 AM
Simone 13
I watched that pbs show about florida pythons and loved the part where the started showing the insides and all. Amazing at how the inner organs work in such a small narrow body.
Posted by Simone on January 31, 2012 at 10:36 AM
Matt from Denver 14
@ 9, depends on what you mean. I'm unaware of rats running off into the unsettled areas surrounding human habitats and multiplying unchecked there. Their environment seems to be "where humans dwell," like that of pigeons. But this is one time when I can embrace the nasty quality some have (killing animals for the hell of it) and hope it's put to good use.

@ 11, do you really believe that the this falls under the same model of birds spreading seeds? Maybe it isn't the bad pet owner syndrome, as @ 10 corrects, but animals from one continent were brought over to another and introduced en masse to an environment where they have no natural predators or competitors.

Perhaps it is natural, under the definitions of the other day's debate, but if so, then efforts to eradicate the pythons and act on the balance of nature is, too.
Posted by Matt from Denver on January 31, 2012 at 10:44 AM
15
If python steaks were marketed as a delicacy ? Oh wait, we're discussing Florida. Python McNuggets 20 pieces with ranch for 5 bucks.
Posted by randomitis on January 31, 2012 at 10:45 AM
Puty 16
Well, I'm concerned that a super-python from Asia has established itself in Florida and could wreak havoc with local ecosystems (including maybe driving local species, both prey and competing predators, to extinction). Also it's sketchy to suggest that an invasive species' dietary needs are a way to measure over-population. Pretty sure biologists would be displeased with Geraldo's #12 comment.
Posted by Puty on January 31, 2012 at 10:51 AM
very bad homo 17
Super Python VS Mega Gator. I think I saw that movie. Wasn't Tiffany in it?
Posted by very bad homo on January 31, 2012 at 11:02 AM
18
I heard a herpetologist just this weekend at a snake class say that a few more freezes in Florida would wipe out the Burmese pythons. This pbs site, which is VERY informative, supports that idea. Fingers are crossed. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/…
Posted by David from Chicago on January 31, 2012 at 11:03 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 19
What @12 says is in line with my way of thinking. The ecosystem had an overabundance of small mammals and was ripe for predation. If it hadn't been pythons, something else would have come along. It doesn't even matter what.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on January 31, 2012 at 11:08 AM
20
@1 put a bounty on them. Worked everywhere else large predators needed killin'.
Posted by Westside forever on January 31, 2012 at 11:16 AM
Matt from Denver 21
@ 19, I think you missed @ 12's irony. I also think you don't understand what happens when an invasive specie has nothing to keep it in check, but one thing it doesn't do is demonstrate that there was an overabundance of prey.
Posted by Matt from Denver on January 31, 2012 at 12:20 PM
OuterCow 22
@14 I do think it falls under the same model, and while they may not have any "natural" predators in Florida, the Earth's history is rife with creatures being introduced into new environments and subsequent extinctions. It's survival of the fittest, not survival of the current equilibrium forever and ever. Though yeah, that would make hunting them down with flamethrowers equally natural.
Posted by OuterCow on January 31, 2012 at 12:21 PM
Matt from Denver 23
@ 22, my understanding is that "survival of the fittest" is a Social Darwinist concept, not one found in actual evolutionary biology. I could be wrong and welcome clarification and correction, but I remember learning this in college.
Posted by Matt from Denver on January 31, 2012 at 12:40 PM
thatsnotright 24
Florida should start developing a market for snakeskin on a large scale. By the time the pythons die down "naturally" they will have created a biological desert. Invasive species never come into balance with local eco-systems. As the pythons die down because they have reduced the number of prey animals, the few remaining predators original to the ecosystem will be wiped out as well because pythons eat them too. Since they climb so easily small pythons consume the eggs and fledglings of already threatened bird species.It is only a matter of time before they spread to Alabama, Louisiana and Georgia.
Posted by thatsnotright on January 31, 2012 at 1:06 PM
Max Solomon 25
@20: but you have to allow hunting in the Natl Park, too. trickier - they used pros in Olympic to kill the goats. Until they got wiley and hung out in inaccessable nooks and crannies of the peaks.
Posted by Max Solomon on January 31, 2012 at 1:25 PM
OuterCow 26
@23 I read up "survival of the fittest" on Wiki, and yeah as the commonly understood social darwinist creed, it's not the guiding principle of evolution and doesn't accurately describe natural selection. Stealing straight from Wiki "Darwin meant it as a metaphor for "better adapted for immediate, local environment", not the common inference of "in the best physical shape".[4] Hence, it is not a scientific description.[5]."

So what I'm trying to say is that the python appears to be better adapted to this new environment however it got there, and its success is natural selection at work.
Posted by OuterCow on January 31, 2012 at 2:15 PM
27
Wasn't Manpythogator a SyFy channel movie?
Posted by NapoleonXIV on January 31, 2012 at 2:17 PM
Matt from Denver 28
@ 26, I think it's safe to say that human interference doesn't fit the classification of "natural" under this construct. It may have been "natural," as discussed the other day, for people to bring pythons from halfway around the world to a research facility from which they escaped, but without the unique human ability to transport animals long distances, "nature" wouldn't have allowed them to come in the first place.
Posted by Matt from Denver on January 31, 2012 at 2:52 PM
OuterCow 29
@28 Major storms, ocean currents carrying dead trees with passengers, ice age land bridges, continents bumping into each other, nature has plenty of ways to get creatures to places they "don't belong."
Posted by OuterCow on January 31, 2012 at 3:38 PM
30
Vince @4 ; Your scenario applies mostly to a normal predator prey balance- like wolves and rabbits in Montana , for example. It doesn't apply to this situation. The pythons aren't native. They are not normally part of that ecosystem. They do not belong in the everglades equation. That's why this is a problem. It is a unique place with unique fauna. Pythons are throwing the balance off by eating everything. predators and prey animals alike. It wont balance out once the mammal population declines because the pythons will eat just about anything. Even pets. Maybe even each other. Those mammals will just be gone forever. It's like the english ivy, blackberries and Scotch broom in the PNW. It just keeps spreading and native stuff is just gone. I hope they figure out a solution.
Posted by randomitis on January 31, 2012 at 5:21 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy