Microsoft VP Brad Smith has an op-ed in the Seattle Times pointing out, as the state supreme court recently ruled, that Washington State is failing its paramount duty to fund basic education. Smith explains: It's hurting companies like Microsoft that require competent local workers. "Washington's employers want to hire Washington students.... But Washington's education system is failing in this regard," Smith laments.
Oh victim of victims! Woe is Microsoft!
Smith conveniently neglects to mention that Microsoft and its executives were the leading funders of a 2010 campaign to stop an income tax on the wealthy—a tax on the upper echelons of companies like Microsoft—that would have dedicated the overwhelming cut of its revenue to funding basic education. Now Smith says we should consider more taxes that disproportionately hit the poor.
"A temporary sales-tax increase, as Gov. Chris Gregoire has proposed, is one important option worth considering," Smith says.
To his credit, Smith also calls for performance reforms. That's well and good, but the primary crisis in Washington is caused by a systemic revenue shortfall. (State general fund revenues as a share of the overall state economy have shrunk from 6.9 percent of personal income in 1995 to 4.7 percent last year, according to the Washington State Economic and Revenue Forecast Council.) And now Smith—and Microsoft—wants more regressive taxes in the state that already has the most anti-poor tax structure in the country.
Sorry, Brad, but these arguments—taxing the rich is bad, taxing the poor is great—would be more credible if they weren't coming from people who make six or seven figures a year. Microsoft wants a well-educated workforce, first and foremost, to provide an affordable labor market and make itself a profitable company. There's nothing wrong with Microsoft profiting and hiring locals—that's what we all want. But we're not quite so stupid (yet) that we forgot Microsoft has contributed to the problem we're into today. If Microsoft wants to be part of the solution—part of truly making this state a good place for workers and business—it would come out for specific progressive tax reforms, not making the current tax structure worse for the poor.
3
6
10
Comments (13) RSS