Slog Music

Music, Nightlife,
and Drinks

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Busting the Myth That Single-Family Housing Dominates Seattle

Posted by on Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:05 PM

Seattle Transit Blog digs into the US Census data showing that multifamily units make up the majority of housing stock in Seattle, while the city's pool of single-family houses has shrunk over the past decade. What's more, that gap is bound to grow:

Just because a majority of the city is zoned for single family housing doesn’t mean that it makes up a majority of housing, which is makes sense when you think about what density actually means, more housing in less area.

The housing trends over the last ten years have seen growth in the medium/large multifamily housing (50+ units) and townhouses, which make up 4.5% and 1.4% more of the housing stock in 2010 than they did in 2000. This growth in their market share came overwhelmingly at the expense of single family housing representing 3.4% less of the housing stock in 2010 as it did in 2000. More importantly, this trend will never reverse, because Seattle essentially has no new buildable land for single family housing. As the city continues to grow, single family housing will continue to represent a smaller and smaller percentage of the city’s housing stock.

The whole post is full of good talking points for when various neighborhood groups squawk about the city shoving density in their pie holes and down their throats.


Comments (3) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
How does this make a talking point to use on anti-density folks? Is "we're already denser than you think" supposed to convince them of something?
Posted by beef rallard on January 25, 2012 at 1:29 PM · Report this
Rotten666 2
Good. I hope the single family housing stocks continues to shrink and my little hole in the wall achieves San Fransisconian value. Then I can convince myself it is worth all of the headaches.
Posted by Rotten666 on January 25, 2012 at 2:15 PM · Report this
As @2 points out, density in the 21st century is a great way of driving up living costs in the city. See SF and NYC as evidence. More density will only account for the people coming into the region, not drive down costs. More money for less space. Though this is perhaps a nation wide problem, it's still important to consider.
Posted by pioneer on January 25, 2012 at 7:05 PM · Report this

Add a comment


Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy