He wants to be the next Washington Secretary of State, but first State Sen. Jim Kastama (D-25) is taking himself off the undecided list and promising to vote for marriage equality.
The new tally: 24 votes for, 20 against, and five senators still undecided (with 25 "yes" votes needed to pass the measure).
UDPATE: Sen. Kastama's speech explaining his decision:
Thank you for being here today.
In my two terms as a State Representative and three as a State Senator, I have defended the institution of marriage and family. The reason I got into politics in the first place was to advocate for upstanding divorced fathers disenfranchised by the state with less than equal child visitation time.
As the economy struggles, deficits rise, and revenues fall, whether we like it or not our federal and state government programs will shrink. Marriage, a source of personal support and financial security for many, will become the true safety net. The state has a responsibility to strengthen marriage to prepare for this economic and societal reality.
As our world has changed, so have our relationships. We are a very different people than we were in the 1950’s or during my childhood. To strengthen marriage as a valued institution it must evolve to meet the demands of today’s couples. In 2012, I believe we have reached the point where society is ready to recognize and support same-sex couples who seek the bonds, benefits and security of marriage. They too, deserve this “safety net.”
My colleagues have informed me that I am one of the last votes needed to pass marriage equality legislation in the Senate.
In the interest of gay and lesbian couples in my district and across our state I will vote “yes” on the marriage equality legislation before us this session.
I believe we need to pass this legislation without a ballot amendment.
This is not my first tough vote. It will not be my last.
This decision is a deeply personal one. Unlike some of my colleagues in liberal districts, I will not return home to cheers and handshakes. I represent the district I was raised in. My wife and I purchased and live in the same house I grew up in and we have raised our family there. My district has known me my whole life and for 16 years has entrusted me to be a fiercely independent legislator. The people of my district are generous and decent, but I also know that there are childhood friends who will never forgive me for this vote.
This is one of the most controversial issues of the past several decades.
However, for many of my colleagues voting for this bill is not controversial at all. There is no risk to them, they are safe to tote the party line from safe seats. To their constituents, this vote will be viewed as a triumph of leadership and a marker of courage. And sadly, some will use this vote to overshadow a record of special interest indebtedness that has failed this state.
When one sponsor of this legislation was asked why he would not support Charter Schools, he said it was because it was too controversial. I’ve heard the same reasons given for why we can’t restructure government or correct a budget that predictably leads to a deficit every single year.
In our toxic political climate, the vulnerable are held hostage to tax increases, students are held hostage to the infighting of adults, and everyone is held hostage to exploding healthcare costs and mounting deficits.
Gays and lesbians are not the only people calling for controversial reforms. Everyone is.
If controversy is the cost of tackling important issues, then I say bring on the controversy. Make controversy the hallmark of this session.
If we can address this difficult issue, then we have no excuse for not addressing other difficult challenges.
Now I’m happy to take any questions and discuss some of those other challenges.