Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Dems Introduce Capital Gains Tax Bill in Olympia

Posted by on Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:12 PM

Representative Laurie Jinkins (D-Tacoma) introduced HB 2563 today, which would impose a 5 percent excise tax on capital gains over $10,000 a year ($5,000 for an individual), a bill that borrows generously from proposals made by the Washington State Budget and Policy Center. The proposed bill would not tax profits from the sale of a primary residence or farmland, or affect retirement savings or inheritances. 97 percent of Washingtonians would see no tax increase at all. In fact, the richest one percent currently enjoy more than three-quarters of all capital gains (mostly the profit on the sale of stocks, bonds, and real estate).

capitalgains.png

One of the downsides to a capital gains tax is that it is extremely volatile, rising and falling with the economic cycle; it is estimated that over past ten years, this tax would have raised between $215 million and $650 million a year, averaging about $480 million a year. On the positive side, it would take an important step toward flattening our sales-tax-heavy most-regressive-in-the-nation tax structure, while generating desperately needed new revenue.

So does it have a snowball's chance in hell of passing? 25 co-sponsors signed on to Jinkins' bill, so it's far from a fringe proposal, and 42 other states already tax capital gains, including Oregon at 11 percent, and Idaho at 7.8 percent. The real hurdle will be in the senate, where road-kill Democrats pretty much give ranking Ways and Means Republican Joe Zarelli effective control of budget issues. Backers are reportedly hopeful, but it will take a lot of discipline and arm-twisting to get the votes even to refer this to ballot.

 

Comments (9) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
only a 5k ceiling?

way too low for individuals
Posted by Swearengen on January 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 2

Capital gains is another form of income tax.

It taxes the productive person, and leaves the entrenched asset holder untouched.

HB2100 taxes assets.

Gains are not assets.

Gains are income.

This is another bad income tax.

HB2100 is the real answer.

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on January 17, 2012 at 3:36 PM
3
The real hurdle will be the electorate, who doesn't want it.
Posted by hrmmm on January 17, 2012 at 3:38 PM
Phoebe in Wallingford 4
A stupid bill. If anything, it should also not tax profits used to buy a primary residence.
Posted by Phoebe in Wallingford on January 17, 2012 at 3:39 PM
5
@SROTU - the electorate doesn't want HB2100, either.
Posted by hrmmm on January 17, 2012 at 3:40 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 6
#5

The electorate wants HB2100

Democrats do not.

Democrats leaders are entrenched wealthy asset holder.

Under the guise of "helping the poor" all their actions are designed to kick down the ladder to the up and coming middle class.

They want a capital gains tax now to prevent someone else from climbing into the billionaire's circle, and hence devaluing their exclusive hold on everything.

The apparatchiks of SLOG, who are clearly under the spell of hypocritical Democrat leadership exhibit this.

Republicans and everyone else should support an Asset tax because it is market driven...those that get the most benefits, pay the most.

Select HB2100.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on January 17, 2012 at 3:47 PM
the idiot formerly known as kk 7
@SROTU. We have a property tax. You do know about it, don't you? Or maybe you don't??

Your contentions that capital gains are the same as income and that a person who receives capital gains is productive are simplistic and wrongheaded.

If your great-uncle Pierpont died and left you a bunch of General Electric stock, you may well be an entrenched asset holder, and you aren't productive just because the stock increases in value.

Your comment @6 makes me think that you're off your meds. You seem more unhinged than usual lately--have you been spending time with WiS? Maybe you need to speak to a counselor?
Posted by the idiot formerly known as kk on January 17, 2012 at 4:26 PM
8
this is a great start in righting our horribly regressive & just plain old wrong tax system. i expect it fail horribly in the legislature.
Posted by philosophy school dropout on January 17, 2012 at 5:28 PM
Timrrr 9
But does it tax short and long-term differently (<1 yr and 1-5 yr respectively) like federal code does?

If we want to encourage long term, more durable investments while penalizing those who profit from speculative, high-risk non-productive paper-trading then our capital gains tax rates need to reflect that.

I suggest the following tax table, based on the length of time the investment is held before gain is realized:

5 or more years: 1%
1 - 5 years: 2%
6 - 12 months: 4%
1 - 6 months: 8%
7 - 30 days: 16%
1 - 7 days: 32%
less than 24 hours: 64%
Posted by Timrrr on January 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy