Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, January 12, 2012

SL Letter of the Day: This One Made My Week

Posted by on Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:52 PM

In the late '90s I was 15 and the only out gay kid in my high-school in Silverdale, WA. I was lucky enough to be apart of a program run by the Kitsap County Health Department to create the first GLBTQ Youth Program in the area. In attendance was usually me, my boyfriend, and a rotating assortment of random lesbian girls. We decided to host a town hall meeting discussing harassment of GLBTQ youth in local schools. To help promote the event I called into your radio show that you had at the time on Sunday nights. The event was to be held at the Silverdale Community Center, on Silvedale Way, in Silverdale, WA. I remember you thinking that was funny. When I called in, you and the others on your show were talking about gay bathhouses and your dislike of them. Without realizing how old I was, you brought me on the air and asked me if i had been to a bathhouse. I told you no, I had never been to one, and you made me promise on the air that I would never go to a bathhouse.

To this day have never been to one.

It's a great story to tell at parties—that at 15 I promised Dan Savage that I would never step foot in a bath house—and everyone gets a kick out of it. I don't know if you remember me or not, Dan, but I just wanted to thank you for being a positive role model and for giving me and others permission to express our true selves. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

Older Wiser Grateful

Thank you, OWG, and... gosh.

I don't usually run letters about how awesome I am—and modesty prompted me to cut an additional paragraph that detailed just how awesomely awesome I am—but I'm making an exception for OWG's letter on account of the bathhouse detail. My detractors accuse me of promoting the worst excesses of gay sex culture. That is has never been the case. So, like, suck on that, detractors.

As for you, OWG, thank you for writing, thank you for staying the hell out of bathhouses, and thank you for coming out in high school back in the '90s and working so hard to make things better for the LGBT kids in your school at the time and the ones who came up after you. You were and remain a role model and an inspiration.

 

Comments (26) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Sandiai 1
Warms the cockles of my heart.

But, Dan, you ARE awesome.
Posted by Sandiai on January 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM
2
you're not fooling anyone, Savage.....
Posted by just kidding- maybe your not a total asshole after all... on January 12, 2012 at 5:01 PM
3
I've never understood how Dan could be so in favour of swingers parties but so against gay bathhouses. I'm not all that keen on bathhouses myself, but at least they provide condoms and forbid drugs (and where fobidding doesn't always work, the rules still inhibit their use). Private sex parties, at least in the gay world, seem to revolve around meth and barebacking. So I don't get what difference it makes to Dan whether people are swinging in private or at a bathhouse.
Posted by Xian-Qi on January 12, 2012 at 5:34 PM
Fred Casely 4
At the risk of this being as lame as the average mention of Stranger editorial/advertising dissonance, may I point out the display ad currently next to this post:

STEAMWORKS CRAM SESSION: Every Tuesday & Wednesday night bring in your student ID & receive a free 90 day membership & $5 off any rental.
Posted by Fred Casely on January 12, 2012 at 5:36 PM
5
Aw! I remember that episode when it came out. Is this what it's like to feel old?
Posted by SpaceGirl on January 12, 2012 at 5:45 PM
DAVIDinKENAI 6
@3; I've always perceived Dan's concerns about bath houses as the rampant annonymous sex with some truly risky dudes. If you wouldn't eat a ham sandwich that had been on the floor, why would you suck a dick that had been in three assholes?

Swinging doesn't have to be annonymous, and it doesn't have to be with risky people (although clearly it is riskier on average than some other venues).

And he's been explicit about gay guys having to have a higher standard of behavior to acheive the lower risk that comes more easily for straights. Of course HIV but a number of STIs are transmitted with greater efficacy anally than vaginally (yeah, yeah, most anal is being done by straights, but per person, gay guys do more), and that there are more screwed up gay guys because of society dumping on them.

I've never heard him recommend going to a swingers event and fucking anything with two legs. But rather to check it out, meet people, negiogate one's scene in advance, etc.

But I suppose you're comparing gay bath houses to gay, private swinger's parties. I haven't noticed the later come up much on SL. Mostly Dan's mentioning swinger's parties in the context of some straight guy or gal who looking to have some obscure kinky itch scratched by a willing partner. It's not fair, but straights and lesbians just don't have as much risk as gay guys.
Posted by DAVIDinKENAI on January 12, 2012 at 5:51 PM
DAVIDinKENAI 7
@4: mostly the ads I see alongside Dan's column nowadays ask if I want to vote for Rick Santorum in 2012.
Posted by DAVIDinKENAI on January 12, 2012 at 5:53 PM
8
If there were straight bathhouses, I would be soooooooooooooooo clean.
Posted by Dr. Gnu on January 12, 2012 at 5:53 PM
DAVIDinKENAI 9
@5, my aging milestones:

Noting that the centerfolds are a decade younger than me when I remember (as a teenager) them being several year older.

Noting that, biologically, the centerfolds could be my children.

Checking out a cute woman and realizing she's half my age.

Still ahead for me:

Centerfolds that ARE the age of my children.

Any interest on my part in anyone 1/3 my age.
Posted by DAVIDinKENAI on January 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM
10
"a rotating assortment of random lesbian girls"
Did this rub anyone else the wrong way? I'm willing to accept I'm reading it wrong, but... it seems rude. I'm sure they didn't think they were random when they were brave enough to come out in the early 90s.
Posted by smoakes on January 12, 2012 at 6:18 PM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 11
@10 Nope, not me. Sexuality is always complicated, for everyone, and I'm not going to judge the actions of GLBT kids as they tried to navigate the very difficult, if not horrific, avenues towards maturity. I doubt OWG was perfect, and maybe the young ladies were looking for something else. Who knows?
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on January 12, 2012 at 6:34 PM
12
Thankm you, Mr Savage, for showing kindness and graciousness to your own.
Posted by vennominon on January 12, 2012 at 6:53 PM
13
@Dan: For you what's the difference between a gay bathhouse and a gay kink fetish party? Why are you down on the first and cook with the second?
You've said you're cool with the latter many times. Sex & shit happens at the latter, organized by a common kink. And the group scene is essential for some kinks. e.g. piss parties, having 10 hot dudes piss on me is something my partner and I can never just by ourselves. Also relatively safe.
Bathhouses: if used as just a place for some JO, not so different from a sex party. Some are clean (Europe, Asia). Some have quite safe sex (just mutual masturbation). Some have 100% safe sex (you JO while watching someone else). Some have let's get to know you first talk in the bright lights (Asia & Europe more than USA).
What's the problem? I agree US bathhouses are kind of gross (at least the couple I've tried before I gave up) but have pretty nice experiences in other countries and have NEVER seen unprotected anal happening. A benefit is that they're great for travelers who might not be around when a party is being held, and you don't have time to waste on Grindr or looking for a hookup in a bar, but you are horny.
You're also cool on using sex workers. Bathhouses are cheaper and sometimes they have hot guys.
Posted by delta35 on January 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM
14
@11 oh, I think you mis-read what I meant. I just didn't like that the LW was referring to them that way.
Posted by smoakes on January 12, 2012 at 7:03 PM
BEG 15
@10 I didn't care for that phrasing either.
Posted by BEG http://twitter.com/#!/browneyedgirl65 on January 12, 2012 at 7:24 PM
TVDinner 16
@10: Yep, me three. Lesbians are all fine and dandy for watching your dog while you jet off to Chicago for the weekend, but, well, they're just not very much fun.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on January 12, 2012 at 7:31 PM
17
@10, 11, et al., I think the LW meant that few to none of the young lesbians stuck with the youth group or showed the commitment to it that he and his boyfriend did.

What do you think he meant?
Posted by clashfan on January 12, 2012 at 8:12 PM
Prairie Dog 18
I agree with @17, clashfan. I read the LW's comment about the lesbian girls as different girls may have attended from session to session, but there were no regular lesbian attendees to that group.
Posted by Prairie Dog on January 12, 2012 at 8:23 PM
seandr 19
@10: Seriously? That kind of over-sensitivity turns everything it touches into shit.

FWIW - my friends and I used the term "randoms" to describe any person who made a brief appearance in our lives while bar-hopping, partying, attending a GLBTQABCFUCKOFF youth program, etc.
Posted by seandr on January 12, 2012 at 9:09 PM
Dingo 20
Men have been having sex with each other in bathhouses for hundreds of years; it's as much a part of gay culture as drag shows, brunch, and the rainbow flag, and arguably has a longer and more global history than any of those things. I've never got why Dan's so down on it, the "ham sandwich" analogy notwithstanding.
Posted by Dingo on January 12, 2012 at 10:56 PM
mtnlion 21
Yep, @10, et al: nitpicking. I'm pretty sure in every Savage Love response/letter, and for that matter, every kickass book and speech and essay, I could find one little thing I don't like. Sometimes those things are even a tad insulting. But what am I going to do? Get annoyed about every little thing and not mention a word about the overwhelming awesomeness of that stuff?

You gotta see the forest through the trees here, and actually in everything if we have a shot at being supportive of those who generally have the same goals and beliefs as us.
Posted by mtnlion on January 12, 2012 at 11:22 PM
Lance Thrustwell 22
For those defending bathhouses: in theory, they could be safe, i.e. if you restrict yourself to just j/o, and you find someone happy to do only that.

In practice, they're not so safe. Reality is, they're open late, often 24 hours. Seems to me that's a deliberate design to lure guys who are lonely and horny after the bars close. They're buzzed and not making the best decisions.

@8 - Much mirth. And me too; as Dan has observed, if there were straight bathhouses filled with naked women ready for sex, the line would be around a city block.
Posted by Lance Thrustwell on January 13, 2012 at 5:37 AM
tehjakers 23
I do believe I said something similar upon our meeting last summer at Trouble with Raja. I again thank you for being a role model when I was a baby gay teen and the tender age of 14 growing up in Eastern Wa/Northern Idaho.
Posted by tehjakers on January 13, 2012 at 9:27 AM
24
Dan has come down against private sex parties in the past. Not categorically, but as they tend to exist in gay culture. As I recall, it's the anonymity and general skeeziness, together with the common lack of safe sex practices, that motivate his dislike. That's not to say group sex and private parties can't be done right; he has lauded the way many swingers clubs go out of their way to insist on condoms and respect for everyone. Also, swingers typically get to know the other people over time. But that's not how Craigslist gay sex parties or bathhouses typically operate.
Posted by dhawk on January 13, 2012 at 9:44 AM
25
It's simple: we should legalize everything Dan enjoys and ban everything he doesn't.
Posted by bobbo on January 13, 2012 at 10:43 AM
BEG 26
Hey, the phrasing just struck me as off. Nothing to start a war over, for fuck's sake. @10 is entitled to their opinion, sheesh.
Posted by BEG http://twitter.com/#!/browneyedgirl65 on January 13, 2012 at 9:30 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy