Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

The State of the State Is Status Quo (Or: "Who Moved My Cheese?" by Governor Chris Gregoire)

Posted by on Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:06 PM

Gregoires State of State: Brought to you by some other persons big ideas.
  • Gregoire's State of State: Brought to you by some other person's big ideas.
You know a State of the State speech is going to be bad when it starts off by borrowing a motivational talking point from Thomas Friedman.

And yet, this is how Governor Chris Gregoire began today's address:

You know, I just read a great new book called “That Used to Be Us,” by Thomas Friedman and Michael Mandelbaum... For generation after generation, they write, America knew how to “win in the turns.”

Can you guess what happened next? Many, many turns of the "win in the turns" phrase, including: "It's our turn to win the turn!"

Lie me down in the turn and run me over now, please.

The governor's uninspired speech was a reminder that a) this is the last time she's going to be doing this thing (hooray!) and b) the state's problems are basically the same as they've been her entire second term. We have a budget hole to fill, we need new revenue, and it's nearly impossible to get new revenue passed because of Eyman's 2/3 requirement. Meanwhile, roads are falling apart, our children is not learning, we're about to close prisons and release inmates early to save money, and just about everything else you can think of is totally, thoroughly fucked.

Oh, but! This time Gregoire (finally) wants to pass a gay marriage bill. Which is great and about time. Also, she wants to levy a $1.50 fee on each barrel of oil produced in Washington state as a way to make oil companies pay for rebuilding transportation infrastructure. Which is a fine idea. Good luck, hope it all passes—along with her proposed half-penny sales tax increase to save basic state services—but man am I glad I never have to listen to her give a State of the State speech again.

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Glad to see that coverage focuses on the very most important aspect of the political message: was the correspondent entertained? This writer will be well prepared when he makes his big-media move to CNN to serve as Wolf Blitzer's understudy.
Posted by maddogm13 on January 10, 2012 at 1:13 PM
2
the oil tax would be good, though i doubt it passes. more sales tax, instead of dealing w/ our horribly broken & regressive state revenue system? i'd rather the kids be in 70 person classes. at least then, we might deal w/ the real problem some day. no more stopgaps that give the 1% exactly what they want... the whole burden on us while they sit back & consolidate their gains. that's what more sales tax is.
Posted by philosophy school dropout on January 10, 2012 at 1:20 PM
3
How about a soda tax? According to the Washington Post, a one cent per ounce soda tax would raise serious revenue while decreasing rates of diabetes and obesity. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra…
Posted by greggreggreg on January 10, 2012 at 1:35 PM
Will in Seattle 4
Gladshe's fired upstairs to her kickback-financed corporate law job back east.

Worst Governator ever.

Sorry I recommended her as our pick for both NOW PAC and NARAL PAC when she first ran for statewide office. My bad.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM
5
Does she mean each barrel of oil refined in Washington state? Because I think almost no barrels of oil are produced from wells in Washington state.
Posted by David Wright on January 10, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Reverse Polarity 6
Gregoire is a fairly good administrator, and a top notch functionary. She has never been an inspiring public speaker, however. I can't imagine why anyone would have expected this year's State of the State speech to be any better than her previous efforts.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on January 10, 2012 at 2:32 PM
knobtheunicorn 7
"our children is not learning"? Pretty funny if that wasn't intentional.
Posted by knobtheunicorn on January 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM
Will in Seattle 8
Produces means it includes bio-diesel.

Think.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 10, 2012 at 2:55 PM
undead ayn rand 9
"I just read a great new book called “That Used to Be Us,” by Thomas Friedman "

There's nothing that'll so quickly indicate the cluelessness of a politician than citing The 'Stache as an inspiration.
Posted by undead ayn rand on January 10, 2012 at 4:25 PM
gloomy gus 10
@6, you put it very nicely.
Posted by gloomy gus on January 10, 2012 at 5:20 PM
11
What this state needs isn't another Teacher Evaluation Form, what this statement desperately requires is a Governor Evaluation Form (which Gregroire, Locke and a bunch of others would soundly flunk!).

This time Gregoire (finally) wants to pass a gay marriage bill.

Duuuuuhhhhh.....more revenues from marriage licenses and hopefully, Greg Noir wishes, taxes from retail dollars from an increase in weddings or wedding-like celebrations.

So what else is new????
Posted by sgt_doom on January 10, 2012 at 6:04 PM
12
The proposed tax would be on every barrel of crude oil refined in the state of Washington. Please everyone that reads this understand that although $1.50 seems like a small fee it actually is a huge number when you realize that typical refineries run over 100,000 barrels per day. Additionally if this tax were in effect this last year nearly every refinery in the state of washington would have lost money. Two things would result from this: 1.) An industry that is actually producing many good paying jobs would start laying people off, or worse plants would start closing further destroying the economy that's already in bad shape. If this happens all that money you were supposed to generate would now be gone.

2.) To make ends meet refineries would start passing the cost onto the consumer. Keep in mind, a LOT comes from one barrel of crude oil including jet fuel, diesel, gasoline, even a primary ingredient in the production of aluminum comes from crude oil. I can imagine hikes in the price of not only gasoline, but diesel and even the price of flights out of SeaTac.

3.) Because it's hard to make a profit refining in Washington it will be easier and easier for refineries in other states and other countries to place their products here. Outsourcing is already a huge issue for our economy, why make it even easier for other countries to steal our jobs??

This is probably more than anyone ever wanted to know, but I just can't stress how incredibly short sighted this idea is. I'd propose re-working the budget for this project, I really think we can accomplish the goal of maintaining our roads without all the high spending projects in this bill. If you feel the need to tax oil to raise money, tax the use of the product not the production of the goods. My reasoning for this is that either way gas prices will rise, but at least if you just tax the use of gasoline it will allow hard working people in the state of Washington to keep their jobs.
More...
Posted by maskaruiki on January 18, 2012 at 6:58 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy