Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Judge Dismisses NIMBY Lawsuit, Allows for Neighborhood Mental Health Center

Posted by on Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:31 AM

Following three months of deliberation, on January 9 King County Superior Court Judge Susan Craighead summarily dismissed a petition brought forth by a group of Jackson Place residents to block the construction of a mental health facility in their neighborhood.

The neighbors had raised various complaints, claiming that the facility violated land-use regulations in a residential neighborhood, including a compliant that it was essentially a prison. But Craighead wrote, "I cannot find that [the city's] application of the law was erroneous."

"While it is true that the police will be called if a resident diverted from the jail leaves, this is not supervision akin to... persons being released from prison," Judge Craighead found.

"The King County Jail is now the state's second-largest mental hospital," wrote Craighead in her eight-page brief (.pdf), highlighting the need for this type of service. "Some two-thirds of the seriously mentally ill inmates in the jail were detained for misdemeanors and nonviolent offenses... the costs—both in dollars and human misery—of a system that does not adequately treat people with mental illness are enormous."

Congrats to the Downtown Emergency Services Center (DESC), which has won yet another battle with NIMBYs intent upon blocking the great work they do. "Today I will formally ask the County for permission to proceed with construction, asap," writes Bill Hobson, Executive Director of the DESC and a Jackson Place resident, in an email today.

The quick back story: Last spring, the City of Seattle issued a building permit to the DESC to operate a Crisis Solutions Center in a former warehouse in the Jackson Place neighborhood—essentially, a 16-bed, around-the-clock mental health hospital where police and medical responders could bring people suffering from mental illness or drug-related problems for treatment, instead of booking them in jail. The crisis center was roundly supported by county and city officials. However, a group of Jackson Place residents, calling themselves the Jackson Place Alliance for Equity, flipped their shit and filed a petition to block the crisis center from their neighborhood, citing three specific complaints:

1) That the crisis center would function more like a prison or "work release facility" than a hospital—which is how the city chose to designate it for zoning purposes—because it diverts individuals from jail. (City zoning regulations wouldn't allow for a jail to be built in the neighborhood).

While Craighead admitted that there were similarities between work release and the crisis center, she found that the city's definition of "hospital... is supported by substantial evidence. [The term 'hospital'] does not require a broad range of medical services be provided, and it says nothing about how patients get to the institution or whether they can leave... Ultimately, the residents of the Center are there to receive psychiatric and substance abuse treatment on a 24-hour basis."

2) JPAE also challenged the city's approval to wall off 15 feet of the proposed crisis center. The details are super wonky, but basically, the proposed building straddles both residential and commercial zones. Hospitals are permitted outright in commercial zones but not in residential. So, the city agreed to allow the DESC to wall off the residential section of the building for use as an emergency exit.

However, Judge Craighead noted that the "'wall off' idea is novel and unprecedented. But it is a practical solution... Nothing in the [zoning] code prohibits such an arrangement."

3) Finally, the JPAE said the whole project was subject to an environmental review (though the city found that it was not). This is a time-wasting tactic beloved by NIMBYs.

Judge Craighead found that they were full of shit on that front, too (in kinder terms, of course). Now the only question is, will the JPAE appeal Judge Craighead's decision in Appellate Court or whether they'll gracefully swallow their loss and roll out the ol' neighborhood welcome mat?

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
seandr 1
Glad to see the cops will be dropping of the criminally insane in someone else's neighborhood.
Posted by seandr on January 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM
Will in Seattle 2
@1 nah, seem to be dumping them in Fremont.

I've noticed another doubling of them in recent weeks.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM
Fnarf 3
They should put it in Laurelhurst or Magnolia.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on January 10, 2012 at 11:45 AM
seandr 4
@3: Rent in Magnolia and Laurelhurst is way too expensive.

No, it's much better to concentrate all of the city's halfway houses for criminals and mentally ill in the Central District. If the CD residents object to the city taking yet another a shit in their backyard, they should move to a whiter neighborhood.
Posted by seandr on January 10, 2012 at 11:58 AM
south downtown 5
to be clear, some residents have "welcomed" them into the neighborhood, albeit cautiously. A Good Neighbor Agreement was struck with the facility to help ensure that it operates safely and transparently.
Posted by south downtown on January 10, 2012 at 12:00 PM
Cienna Madrid 6
@5, you're absolutely right. Thanks for bringing that up.
Posted by Cienna Madrid on January 10, 2012 at 12:17 PM
7
Cienna Madrid=DESC's SuperPAC
Posted by CD resident on January 10, 2012 at 1:06 PM
8
I think Cienna Madrid is full of shit
Posted by wicked88 on January 10, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Geraldo Riviera 9
@8 She is full of salt.

@4 is full-on right.
Posted by Geraldo Riviera on January 10, 2012 at 2:44 PM
10
Since when does a "whiter neighborhood" mean it's a better neighborhood?
Posted by Gabriel I on January 11, 2012 at 2:37 PM
11
This article is obviously biased and attempts to reduce the neighbors genuine reasons for concern to NIMBYism. The important issues that were presented by neighbors are not presented clearly nor with any true journalistic non-bias.

Cienna Madrid and the Stranger should be ashamed to publish such a ridulously biased article.
Posted by Seattlereader on January 17, 2012 at 9:34 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy