Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

UW Investigated for Violating State Labor Laws

Posted by on Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:14 PM

Updated with comments from Norm Arkans, a spokesman for the UW.

The University of Washington may be guilty of repeatedly violating Washington State labor law, according to a preliminary ruling issued by the Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC.pdf). The PERC's ruling responds to six complaints filed in November by 30 unionized campus police officers, represented by Teamsters Local 117.

This fight comes down to issues brought up at the bargaining table. Specifically, the campus officers accuse the UW Police Department management team of "interfering with employee rights, discriminating against employees for engaging in protected Union activities, and refusing to bargain in good faith," according to a Local 117 press release.

“They have created a Big Brother environment at work where officers are intimidated, which makes it difficult for us to focus on protecting the public,” stated Officer Raymond Wilson, a five-year campus employee and Local 117 shop steward in the release.

"We believe the allegations are completely without merit," counters Norm Arkans, a spokesman for the UW, "and we will be at the hearing to try and convince people of that."

School officials (or rather, their lawyers) have until January 10 to respond to each of the union's allegations, at which point a PERC examiner will set up a hearing for the case. If the school fails to respond, it "will be deemed as an admission that the [allegations are] true," states a December 20th PERC letter. However, if UW was found at fault, it would simply mean that the campus's police department management team would have to void out all of the union contract changes that prompted the unfair labor practices and return to bargaining table with the campus union, where they'd have to once again "bargain for any new contract changes or bargain over what they'd done," explains David Gedrose, an unfair labor practice manager with PERC.

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
UW employs 40,000, so it's good these 30 are working to help keep them on their toes.
Posted by gloomy gus on January 4, 2012 at 12:26 PM
2
Cops complaining about a Big Brother environment? Now that's something.
Posted by unbelievable on January 4, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Will in Seattle 3
They are fine people.

But very jealous of the out of control, unchecked, SPD.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 4, 2012 at 12:41 PM
Cienna Madrid 4
@1 and 2, thank you for commenting on this incredibly boring post.
Posted by Cienna Madrid on January 4, 2012 at 12:42 PM
gloomy gus 5
@4, speaking of boring posts, go upstairs to Bartell's. They have valentine's day candy at good prices.
Posted by gloomy gus on January 4, 2012 at 12:57 PM
Cienna Madrid 6
@5, I forgive you for calling my *breaking news* candy cravings boring ONLY BECAUSE you've nicely filled that craving with season-appropriate sugar pellets.

*curtsy*
Posted by Cienna Madrid on January 4, 2012 at 1:24 PM
Simac 7
While they're at it they might want to look into the fact that most TAs are paid for 22 hours or fewer but in most departments are expected/forced to work well more than that.
Posted by Simac on January 4, 2012 at 1:34 PM
8
These wouldn't be the UWPD cops who infiltrated a meeting of the Student Worker Coalition, would they?

http://dailyuw.com/news/2010/apr/22/uw-d…
Posted by seatackled on January 4, 2012 at 1:52 PM
9
Your headline is inaccurate. Look at the document you're linking to. The union has filed a complaint that UW has violated collective bargaining laws. There will be a hearing to determine whether or not the complaint has merit. The preliminary ruling (in PDF) is premised on the assumption that everything in the complaint is accurate, a premise that will be tested at the hearing. Unless UW's doing its own internal investigation, it's not "under investigation" by anybody.
Posted by giantladysquirrels on January 4, 2012 at 2:05 PM
10
@Cienna:

(1) Boring? Not to me. I like a little hard news mixed in with my infotainment. The more posts about labor issues, the better; it's not like the establishment press is doing a bang-up job of covering them.

(2) CANDY!!!

(3) I'm still really, really, really pissed off at George Bartell and Bartell Drugs for their big monetary and PR contributions to the No on I-1098 campaign. (That was the income-tax-on-the-rich initiative that failed last year.) Thanks to the ad blitz funded by George (and Jeff and Steve and Paul and other super-rich Washingtonians), we not only continue to have the most regressive state-and-local tax system in the country, it's going to get even worse (if the proposed sales tax hike goes through). Bartell's has nice stores and decent specials, I've never had an incorrect price scan up at the register, and given the low apparent turnover, they might treat their employees halfway decently. But I'm so pissed off that I've been boycotting them (and their partners in fiscal and social crime) to the extent possible. I'm just sayin'.
Posted by PCM on January 4, 2012 at 3:19 PM
gloomy gus 11
@10, if you want to boycott Bartell Drug for its owner's checkwriting on that, go ahead, but I'd rather continue to support the local company and vow to stick up for tax reform a little stronger next time. Our failure to advocate very forcefully on that is our own shame, and trying to lay it at somebody else's feet is foolish. If we had bothered to get our shit together on that George's lobbying wouldn't have made any difference.
Posted by gloomy gus on January 4, 2012 at 6:06 PM
12
@11, I will continue to boycott Bartell and encourage others to do so as well. I do not willingly put money in the pockets of a person or outfit that actively supports something I am vehemently opposed to, whether they are "local" or not. And I will continue to blame the people who funded the anti I-1098 scare propaganda more than I blame the people who fell for it.

But if you have a plan for "getting our shit together" that does not require raising as much money from poor folk as the other side raises from rich folk, I'm all ears. Grassroots? Door-to-door? Person-to-person? Great, but so long as we allow unlimited, unequal spending in political campaigns, we're going to have to do it *every time*.

Posted by PCM on January 4, 2012 at 11:38 PM
13
CIENNA- that's a great article, there are obviously Chiefs, Managers, etc. at UWPD who are violating employees rights on daily bases, acting like a small town villains- this is NOT admissable in 21st century America! How about reaching out and contacting the PD and it's employess for a comment? You may stumble upon more serious violations and gruesome discoveries...
Atta girl!
Posted by showmetheway1 on January 5, 2012 at 10:44 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy