Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Mitt Romney's 30,000-Something-Vote Ceiling

Posted by on Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:18 AM

While most of the pundits focused on the virtual tie between Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney in the Iowa Republican caucus, I was captivated by the possibility of an even less likely scenario: that Romney might exactly match his 2008 Iowa totals.

In 2008, Romney finished second behind Mike Huckabee, with 30,021 votes, or 25.19 percent. Four years and about $3.4 million later, Romney has apparently finished with 30,015 votes, or 24.55 percent, just 8 votes ahead of second place Santorum, and a mere six votes short of his 2008 totals. Of course these results aren't yet official, and Karl Rove hasn't necessarily finished marking all his ballots, so another 6 vote pickup isn't out of the question.

Kinda amazing.

Remember, Iowa was spun as a big loss for Romney back in 2008—a loss from which he never really recovered. But the only difference for Romney between 2008 and 2012, is that this time around, conservative caucus goers didn't coalesce behind a single candidate. Romney's numbers didn't budge at all. Compare that to Ron Paul, the only other holdover from the 2008 nomination fight: Paul more than doubled his Iowa numbers.

It's damn hard to see how anybody but Romney wins the GOP nomination, but if he does, his Iowa numbers suggest that his victory won't be the result of any surge of popularity within Republican ranks. Rather, it's the general weakness of the rest of the field that's proving to be the secret to Romney's success, a formula that doesn't bode well for November.

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Shouldn't your headline be something like:

SIX ROMNEY SUPPORTERS DIE IN IOWA!

Or maybe they just moved away.
Posted by Smartypants on January 4, 2012 at 12:20 AM
2
Was surprised that Romney won -- thought Paul or Santorum would take Iowa. Can't see how Romney doesn't win the nomination.
Posted by Patricia Kayden on January 4, 2012 at 2:58 AM
3
Listening to Charlie Rose, hearing the word "Santorum" way too much
Posted by Astrella on January 4, 2012 at 4:17 AM
4
Obama, on the other hand-
well- that guy has just soared over the past four years!

Goldy, remind us what Obama's approval rating are now compared to at the beginning of the term.....
Posted by You Got Nothin', Assholes on January 4, 2012 at 5:04 AM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 5
Poor troll. He's distraught. Perhaps mother could make some applesauce cake. That always cheers him up.

Obviously, what we need here is Ron Paul and Donald Trump to run as independents.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on January 4, 2012 at 6:43 AM
6
poor Romney and his ceiling.

of course Newt or Perry would give their nuts for a 30,000 vote ceiling.......
Posted by Butt then, Goldy wouldn't know squat about nuts.... on January 4, 2012 at 7:02 AM
7
5

poor tranny manny.

trolling the anonymous troll?

so early in the morning?
Posted by That ain't good form, you know. Not good form at all... on January 4, 2012 at 7:05 AM
Matt from Denver 8
I also find the fact that Romney got the exact same results fascinating, but I think your analysis is simplistic - how long has it been known that the rank and file have been floundering for their Conservative Chosen One and don't like moderate, flip-flopping Mitt Romney?

What's really more interesting is this: Will Santorum be the one that the hardcore cons rally behind and stick with? Too soon to say - we need to see what happens in New Hampshire and South Carolina. But if the frothy one wins or comes in a close second in those states, we'll be in for a great GOP nomination campaign.
Posted by Matt from Denver on January 4, 2012 at 7:52 AM
nseattlite 9
Best part: Santorum is #2! But we knew that all along ...
Posted by nseattlite on January 4, 2012 at 7:56 AM
Matt from Denver 10
BTW Goldy, this is off topic but ought to be of interest to you - an article about red light cameras in Denver. Just for you to peruse in your free time.

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/c…
Posted by Matt from Denver on January 4, 2012 at 8:11 AM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 11
Admit it, troll darling - you love it when I troll you. It's the closest thing to female flirtation you get.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on January 4, 2012 at 8:17 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy