Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, December 26, 2011

The Big Lie

Posted by on Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:19 PM

In the international edition of Newsweek, and posted to the Daily Beast, author Michael Thomas writes about Wall Street's "Big Lie," and the coming firestorm of retribution:

The Street and its ministries of propaganda have fallen back on a Big Lie as old as capitalism itself: that all that has gone wrong has been government’s fault. This time, however, I don’t think the argument that “Washington ate my homework” is going to work. This time, a firestorm is going to explode about the Street’s head—and about time, too.

[...] Over the next year, I expect the “what” will give way to the “how” in the broad electorate’s comprehension of the financial situation. The 99 percent must learn to differentiate the bloodsuckers and rent-extractors from those in the 1 percent who make the world a better, more just place to live. Once people realize how Wall Street made its pile, understand how financiers get rich, what it is that they actually do, the time will become ripe for someone to gather the spreading ripples of anger and perplexity into a focused tsunami of retribution. To make the bastards pay, properly, for the grief and woe they have caused. Perhaps not to the extent proposed by H. L. Mencken, who wrote that when a bank fails, the first order of business should be to hang its board of directors, but in a manner in which the pain is proportionate to the collateral damage. Possibly an excess-profits tax retroactive to 2007, or some form of “Tobin tax” on transactions, or a wealth tax. The era of money for nothing will be over.

But it won’t just end with taxes. When the great day comes, Wall Street will pray for another Pecora, because compared with the rough beast now beginning to strain at the leash, Pecora will look like Phil Gramm. Humiliation and ridicule, even financial penalties, will be the least of the Street’s tribulations. There will be prosecutions and show trials. There will be violence, mark my words. Houses burnt, property defaced. I just hope that this time the mob targets the right people in Wall Street and in Washington. (How does a right-thinking Christian go about asking Santa for Mitch McConnell’s head under the Christmas tree?) There will be kleptocrats who threaten to take themselves elsewhere if their demands on jurisdictions and tax breaks aren’t met, and I say let ’em go!

And no, Thomas is not some dirty, fucking, hippie commie. He's a former partner at Lehman Brothers. Read the whole damn thing.

 

Comments (29) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
what_now 1
Hey SLOG, somebody come wake me up when it's not The Goldy Show anymore.
Posted by what_now on December 26, 2011 at 9:26 PM
2
@2: I'm done. It's The Paul and Megan Show tomorrow.
Posted by Goldy on December 26, 2011 at 9:36 PM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 3
It has been proven time & again that people will go to great lengths to preserve their delusions.
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on December 26, 2011 at 9:37 PM
Curmudgeon 4
If the people ask "why?" they will be told that the crops have failed because their immorality has angered the gods. And they will believe it. Then they will sacrifice more of their young to appease the gods.
Posted by Curmudgeon on December 26, 2011 at 9:53 PM
5
A backlash against Wall St? I can't really see that happening. Back in 2010 the electorate responded to Obama's moderate agenda by handing control of the House to the Republicans.
Posted by Ken Mehlman on December 26, 2011 at 10:17 PM
gloomy gus 6
What a great find! Thomas has always been a wonderful read, and can be funny as hell. He's gleefully burned more bridges than most of us will ever get to cross. Alan Dershowitz once tried to get him taken off a book review he feared would make his client Milken look bad. He's been hoping for a Wall Street comeuppance for decades - and a career resurgence for his writing, too. We'll see if he gets at least one of his wishes.
Posted by gloomy gus on December 26, 2011 at 10:22 PM
7
Ah, so this is what sells ad space in the international edition of Newsweek.

Let's all have a guess at what the target demographic looks like, shall we? My guess is "upper middle class Europeans killing time in hotel lobbies."
Posted by robotslave on December 26, 2011 at 10:29 PM
8
@5 and @7 are both absolutely right. Not that it wouldn't be delightful if these predictions came true, but come on. Systemic corruption doesn't suddenly get ripped down unless there is a dramatic and sudden shock. Depressions, even great ones, are not that.
Posted by sahara29 on December 26, 2011 at 11:07 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 9
Sounds like someone is trying to save his own skin,,,the 'good' 1% vs those mean bad old ones.

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on December 27, 2011 at 1:12 AM
Vince 10
What's that saying? If it sounds too good to be true...? I'll believe it when I see it. And a new report shows that congress is chock full of multi millionares. They'll protect only themselves.
Posted by Vince on December 27, 2011 at 4:20 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 11
It's absurd to say that there are "good" people among the 1%. How many of them are involved with doing anything other than lining their own pockets? Not many, I'll bet.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on December 27, 2011 at 4:22 AM
Karlheinz Arschbomber 12
The 1% is a VERY heterogeneous group. If somebody starts a company which makes successful products and becomes insanely wealthy, good for them (even people/companies I despise, like Bill Gates/MS). If somebody just inherits billions and shuffles it around, or is some B-school drinking lad who wormed into the right crowd, or some scumball Romney-ish hedge fund douche bag, then they are just high-rolling shitballs.
Posted by Karlheinz Arschbomber http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arschbombe on December 27, 2011 at 5:11 AM
Cato the Younger Younger 13
I found plans on how to build your own guillotine on line!! Oh wait...we're not using those yet are we?
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on December 27, 2011 at 5:16 AM
Karlheinz Arschbomber 14
All of the imagery of Charles Darnay and Madame Defarge is represented in this story. And I think he's correct. The ramp-up period is uncertain, but the repressive measures are definitely well beyond the prototype phase. This will not be an entertaining grab-a-bag-o-popcorn show.
Posted by Karlheinz Arschbomber http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arschbombe on December 27, 2011 at 5:22 AM
15
Arguably, it WAS the government's fault: the repeal of regulations that would have prevented the mortgage apocalypse, and the failure to enforce what little regulation remained, falls square in Congress' lap, and both Clinton and Bush II must take responsibility for signing those laws into effect.
Posted by TechBear on December 27, 2011 at 6:11 AM
16
To clarify what I wrote in #15: History shows, very clearly and very frequently, that investment bankers are little more than spoiled, greedy children. When a child goes on a crime spree, it is legitimate to ask, "Where were the parents when all this was happening? Why didn't they step in to stop this?"
Posted by TechBear on December 27, 2011 at 6:16 AM
17
Because, obviously, the rich are incapable of exploiting something without the government's permission...
Posted by mubhappy on December 27, 2011 at 6:58 AM
Max Solomon 18
it would make sense as a populist campaign strategy for obama, so maybe.

ha. i amuse myself.
Posted by Max Solomon on December 27, 2011 at 7:03 AM
wingedkat 19
I don't have his optimism.
Posted by wingedkat on December 27, 2011 at 7:33 AM
BLUE 20
Well, that's TWO true believers by my count: Thomas and Goldy.

Is there anything, anything, anything, Goldy can post that isn't just someone's daydream? At least give us a daydream propped up by SOME empirical evidence. Fucking ad hominem, argument from authority, ..., there's smoke and more smoke.
Posted by BLUE on December 27, 2011 at 8:51 AM
Marq 21
The 'Money For Nothing' may be over, but I hope the 'Chicks For Free' era continues for many years to come.
Posted by Marq on December 27, 2011 at 9:33 AM
22
" He's a former partner at Lehman Brothers. Read the whole damn thing."

Why do the infantilized types, like Goldy (who probably means well, though) always cite jackholes as if that somehow lends credence to the obvious?????

All people need to fully realize, is the truth and the history behind it.

1913: In that year, the year know as Rockefeller's Year, four pieces of fraud legislation were passed.

(1) The Aldrich Act, latter to be renamed the Federal Reserve Act (Sen. Aldrich had married into the Rockefeller family and was John D. Rockefeller's son-in-law) which set up 12 credit monopolies, the Federal Reserve System -- who created the money, then lent it to the US Treasury, thusly putting the American government and people in debt to the private banksters. The private banks which own the Fed receive a guaranteed 6% dividend.***

(2) The 16th Amendment, creating the federal income tax, which was created to pay the Federal Reserve the interest owed on the money they lent the US government. (Originally, the federal income tax went directly to the Federal Reserve Bank.)

(3) The oil depletion allowance, which subsidized the oil companies, chiefly Rockefeller's Standard Oil. (But also Morgan, Harriman and Mellon's businesses.)

(4) Tax exemptions for foundations and churches. Foundations, although probably used somewhat for this reason previously, were highly structured through this legislation to be the principal source to hide both wealth and ownership, while avoiding taxation, of the senior plutocrats (supposed to have been structured by Rockefeller's law firm which originally created the holding company structure).

***Thusly, the banksters were subsidized, their oil companies were subsidized, they avoided taxation while hiding the true amount of their wealth and vast holdings. William Jennings Bryan, who was against such a move, was fooled into believing the government would print the money (which it does and pays for, via the US Bureau of Engraving and Printing) without being shown the entire legislation. Robert Owens, the coauthor of this legislation, was connected to the plutocrats as his father was president of the Virginia and Tennessee Railroad.
More...
Posted by sgt_doom on December 27, 2011 at 10:17 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 23
Doom, for somebody who thinks he's so smart, you sure are a dumbshit. Nobody gives two craps about what you think. Go fuck yourself and save us the effort of having to skip over your mindless posts.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on December 27, 2011 at 10:28 AM
24
@15, TECHbear,

"Arguably, it WAS the government's fault:.."

Negative, sonny, it was the government, specifically elected officials and those they appointed, who aided and abetted, and were accessories --- it was the Wall Streeters (Goldman Sachs -- whose alumnus makes up the entire managment of the Treasury, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, the PE leveraged buyout thieves, Blackstone Group, Carlyle, Citadel, etc., et al.) who bought and paid for those elected accessories.

This isn't a technicality, but simply how it was and is done.....
Posted by sgt_doom on December 27, 2011 at 10:30 AM
25
@23, troll, you really aren't very familiar with the Web, are you dood???

" Nobody gives two craps about what you think." (The history of responses speaks against you, Discovery Institute stooge.)

And here is what your brethren, the 1% of the job destroyers and job offshorers are up to:

(Latest astroturf firm)

http://jobcreatorsalliance.org/About.asp…

http://jobcreatorsalliance.org/Leaders.a…
Posted by sgt_doom on December 27, 2011 at 10:59 AM
venomlash 26
@25: 5280 is an oldfag by any account. You, sir, are a newfag, regardless of your time on the web.
Posted by venomlash on December 27, 2011 at 12:04 PM
Dougsf 27
It doesn't mean you can't enjoy his writing, but Michael Thomas' character is certainly not something that should be lauded.
Posted by Dougsf on December 27, 2011 at 12:51 PM
28
@22 Wow. So much paranoia, delusion, conspiracy theory, macroeconomic stupidity, anger, and general ignorance in one single post! Well done, lad!

I'd offer you some advice, but I wouldn't know where to begin.
Posted by Brooklyn Reader on December 27, 2011 at 1:34 PM
gloomy gus 29
@26, how I love you.
  ∆
∆ ∆
Posted by gloomy gus on December 27, 2011 at 3:15 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy