Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, December 26, 2011

First They Came for the Cupcakes, and I Didn't Speak Out Because I Wasn't a Cupcake

Posted by on Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:00 AM

Um... these are the people we're supposed to blindly trust to bathe us in radiation?

An airport security officer confiscated a frosted cupcake amid fears its icing could be a security risk, according to reports.

Rebecca Hains said the Transportation Security Administration agent at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas took her cupcake Wednesday. According to Hains, he told her its frosting was enough like a gel to violate TSA restrictions on allowing liquids and gels onto flights to prevent them from being used as explosives.

Hains said the agent didn't seem concerned that the red velvet cupcake, which was packaged in an 8-ounce mason jar, could actually be explosive, just that it fit some bureaucratic definition about what was prohibited.

"Once he had identified it as a security threat it was no longer mine and I couldn't have it back," Hains told NBC station WHDH.

Of course, as Hains points out, "It's not really about the cupcake." It's about our willingness to tolerate ever greater encroachments on our civil liberties, no matter how fucking absurd.

 

Comments (24) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Banna 1
She couldn't have even taken a bite to show it was edible? I've heard that many new moms have had to take a swig of their bottled breast milk for the same purpose.
Posted by Banna http://www.ucp.org on December 26, 2011 at 7:09 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 2
It has nothing to do with security - it's "security theater." But you already knew that.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on December 26, 2011 at 7:26 AM
WFM 3
Come on, everybody knows that exploding confections is al quaeda's next move and the TSA is on top of it like chocolate raspberry frosting on a vanilla espresso cupcake. You watch-- next headline will be about a national guardsman throwing himself on an eclair and winning the medal of honor.
Posted by WFM on December 26, 2011 at 7:35 AM
Packeteer 4
@1 That is not a good test to determine if something is not poison or a bomb. A suicide bomber would happily drink explosives knowing he is going to die soon anyway.
Posted by Packeteer on December 26, 2011 at 8:06 AM
rob! 5
"I'm sorry, ma'am, but rules are rules. Do have a pleasant flight, though, won't you? .....................[psssst, hey, cover for me a minute, okay? I need a bathroom break!]"

Somebody should post a recipe for cupcakes with an invisible dye that colors lips and tongues fluorescent green for a week or so. Harmlessly, of course.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on December 26, 2011 at 8:27 AM
6
Frosting is a foam not a gel.
Posted by kinaidos on December 26, 2011 at 8:32 AM
Luisa 7
mindless mindless mindless very bad mindless security theater
Posted by Luisa on December 26, 2011 at 8:39 AM
Max Solomon 8
all rules must be enforced equally and completely or civilization will collapse.
Posted by Max Solomon on December 26, 2011 at 8:48 AM
9
This type of security theater is imposed because the voters demand it. Can you imagine what would happen to Obama's reelection bid if he relaxed airport security? Next time your waiting in line at a TSA checkpoint say to yourself "This is what democracy looks like."
Posted by Ken Mehlman on December 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM
Joe Szilagyi 10
How do I know the mayonaise on your sandwich isn't gelignite?
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://twitter.com/joeszi on December 26, 2011 at 9:07 AM
11
#9 Nonsense of the first water.

But whatever you do, don't submit to the bodyscan. The FDA warning was ignored, and what were medical devices meant to be used sparingly, became a boondoggle (a corporation buying Congress) -- there's money to made irriadiating you willy nilly.

I insisted on the pat down, instead. Which wasn't particularly invasive, and less likely to cause cancer as well.
http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-12…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_body_s…
Posted by judybrowni on December 26, 2011 at 9:12 AM
Cato the Younger Younger 12
Well...at least I can still bring my fruitcake on my next flight...my fruitcake MADE OF PLASTIC EXPLOSIVES!!!!!!BWHAHAHAHHAHAH!!!!!!
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on December 26, 2011 at 9:13 AM
BLUE 13
All REAL scientific investigations uncover no evidence of radiation risk from the airport machines. That said, I fly often and always opt for the pat down. Not only do I wish for everyone to join me and thereby bring security and flying to an abrupt halt but... it feels real swell too.
Posted by BLUE on December 26, 2011 at 9:20 AM
Goldy 14
@13: I've learned to scout out the security lines at SeaTac, and pick the ones that are not using the body scanners. (Invariably, there's always one or two out of commission.) Presumably, dedicated terrorists are too stupid to do the same, so there's no flaw in our security system here.
Posted by Goldy on December 26, 2011 at 9:30 AM
Will in Seattle 15
Real counter-terrorism professionals Know the TSA is a total farce and waste of time and taxes.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 26, 2011 at 9:30 AM
16
This story reminds me so much of flying (years before the TSA) between SFO and SEA with some handcuffs and other toys in my backpack.

Leaving SFO? "Sorry, sir, you have to check your bag, those are dangerous"

Leaving SEA? Phone number, ten minutes or so of flirting with the baggage scanning person.

Airport security (like 911) is a joke (all glory to the prophet Flava Flav). Has been for the 20 years I've been regularly flying.
Posted by dagard on December 26, 2011 at 9:32 AM
17
@11 "there's money to made irriadiating you willy nilly." Maybe so, but not that much money. As we've discussed before on this blog federal spending on food stamps exceeds the entire homeland security budget. The TSA'S budget simply isn't big enough to buy much in the way of good will from greedy corporations.
Posted by Ken Mehlman on December 26, 2011 at 9:34 AM
lauramae 18
Once when flying out of Chicago Midway, the ticket dispenser jammed. The ticket agent had to open the lid and hand me a temp boarding pass with the instructions to exchange it at the gate. I went through the TSA first line of defense, and then the security area. Showed my pas and my id once, I think, to an indifferent guy who went through the motions of checking it against my id and then checked off the pass. I get to the gate and the agent at the desk is exasperated because I am the 2nd person through that day whose boarding pass did not match her name on her id. The pass I was handed said "Oscar Hernandez." Laura Mae isn't Oscar Hernandez.
Posted by lauramae on December 26, 2011 at 9:34 AM
19
What I want to know is how this woman managed to get this story picked up, since they've been doing this shit for years.

I once got a small jar of homemade peanut butter confiscated as I was traveling with my elderly mother, who was the one who made the peanut butter. I told them what it was and they said they couldn't let me through.

As for the pat downs, I always ask for them, too. Have you noticed that the TSA personnel call this an "opt out," though?
Posted by seatackled on December 26, 2011 at 10:10 AM
Simone 20
“The TSA supervisor, Robert Epps, was using really bad logic – he said it counted as a gel-like substance because it was conforming to the shape of its container.”

Well shit. My toothpaste gel conforms to the shape of its container. Might as well take all the toothpaste and make everyone have bad breath on the plane.
Posted by Simone on December 26, 2011 at 10:16 AM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 21
@17 the difference for me is that the food stamp program, which helps millions of Americans, is precisely the sort of thing the terrorists don't want. The TSA program, which doesn't help anyone, is also precisely the sort of thing the terrorists *do* want. Which leaves me with the question, Why do you hate America? Why do you support the terrorists?
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on December 26, 2011 at 12:01 PM
22
The "why" is obvious: the TSA agent wanted the cupcake, and he had a threat of dire consequences that allowed him to steal it. After all, what was the alternative? To be locked up in a tiny room, with her kid and husband who knows where, while she missed her flight?
Posted by TechBear on December 26, 2011 at 3:03 PM
Goldy 23
@19: Because it was a "cupcake." There's just something inherently absurd about confiscating a cupcake. The media are funny that way.
Posted by Goldy on December 27, 2011 at 12:08 AM
24
Sometimes frosting does taste like it's chock full of nitro-cellulose.
Posted by Westside forever on December 27, 2011 at 11:19 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy